Skip to main content

War Roboethics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Roboethics

Part of the book series: Intelligent Systems, Control and Automation: Science and Engineering ((ISCA,volume 79))

  • 2124 Accesses

Abstract

Military robots are receiving increasing use in modern conflicts of arms, and naturally give rise to severe war robot ethical questions concerning the firing decision, discrimination, responsibility, and proportionality. This chapter starts with background material on the war concept and the ethical issues/laws of war. Then, it discusses the ethics of autonomous or semiautonomous robots in war, and presents the principal arguments against autonomous war robots (inability to program war laws, human out of the firing loop, lower barriers to war), also including some positive arguments about war robots.

In war, truth is the first casualty.

Aeschylus

Never think that war, no matter how necessary, nor how justified, is not a crime.

Ernest Heningway

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Most countries accept nowadays the position that international peace and security require the United Nations Security Council approval prior to an armed response to aggression, unless there is an imminent threat.

  2. 2.

    The use of nuclear weapons is not prohibited by the war laws, but is a “taboo” and never used after World War II.

  3. 3.

    It is noted that the two other categories on the amount of human involvement in selecting targets and firing are: human-on-the loop (robots can select targets and fire under the oversight of a human who can override the robot’s actions) and human-out-of-the loop (robots that are capable of selecting targets and firing without any human input or interaction).

References

  1. Coates AJ (1997) The ethics of war. University of Manchester Press, Manchester

    Google Scholar 

  2. Holmes R (1989) On war and morality. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, war, 28 July 2005. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/war

  4. BBC, Ethics of war. http://www.bbc.co.uk/ethics/war/overview/introduction.shtm (Now archived)

  5. Singer P (2009) Wired for war: the robotics revolution and conflict in the 21st century. Penguin Press, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Asaro P (2008) How just could a robot war be?. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 50–64

    Google Scholar 

  7. Arkin RC (2000) Governing lethal behavior in autonomous robots. CRC Press, Bocan Raton

    Google Scholar 

  8. http://www.defence.gov/Transcripts/Transcripts.apsx?TranscriptID=1108

  9. Lin P, Bekey G, Abney K (2009) Robots in war: issues of risk and ethics. In: Capuro R, Nagenborg M (eds) Ethics and robotics. AKA Verlag Heidelberg, Heidelberg, pp 49–67

    Google Scholar 

  10. Walzer M (2000) Just and unjust wars: a moral argument with historical illustrations. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schmidt MN (1999) The principle of discrimination in 21st century warfare. Yale Hum Rights Dev Law J 2(1):143–164

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sharkey N (2008) The ethical frontiers of robotics. Science 322:1800–1801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sharkey N (2008) Cassandra or false prophet of doom: AI robots and war. IEEE Intell Syst 23(24):14–17

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Anderson K, Waxman M Law and ethics for autonomous weapon systems: why a ban won’t work and how the laws of war can, laws and ethics for autonomous weapon systems. Hoover Institution, Stanford University. www.hoover.org/taskforces/national-security

  15. Asaro A (2007) Robots and responsibility from a legal perspective. In: Proceedings of 2007 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation: workshop on roboethics, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sparrow R (2007) Killer robots. J. Appl Philos 24(1):62–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hennigan WH (2012) New drone has no pilot anywhere, so who’s accountable? Los Angeles Time, 26 Jan 2012. http://www.articles.latimes.com/2012/jan26/business/la-fi-auto-drone-20120126

  18. Cummings ML (2006) Automation and accountability in decision support system interface design. J. Technol Stud 32:23–31

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lin P (2012) Robots, ethics and war, the center for internet and society. Stanford Law School, Nov 2012. http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/blog/2010/12/robots-ethics-war

  20. HRW-IHRC (2012) Losing humanity: the case against killer robots, Human Rights Watch. (www.hrw.org)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Spyros G. Tzafestas .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tzafestas, S.G. (2016). War Roboethics. In: Roboethics. Intelligent Systems, Control and Automation: Science and Engineering, vol 79. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21714-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21714-7_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-21713-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-21714-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics