Skip to main content

The Faith Development Interview: Methodological Considerations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Semantics and Psychology of Spirituality

Abstract

This chapter presents an introduction to the Faith Development Interview (FDI) and describes its background in Fowler ’s theory and research, explains the FDI questions and the evaluation procedure according to the Manual for Faith Development Research. Then this chapter introduces our more recent methodological modifications of the FDI evaluation procedure, which were applied in the Bielefeld-based Cross-cultural Study of “Spirituality” in which more than one hundred FDIs have been conducted and evaluated. Suggestions for the modification of the evaluation method include: taking into account the differences between the aspects of faith, more decisive attention to the wealth of narrative data and the various dimensions which the FDI questions elicit beyond the structural-developmental information, and finally the triangulation with questionnaire data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We present the version of the FDI questions (follow-up questions are in brackets) as used in our current research. In this version, some questions, as they are presented in the Manual for Faith Development Research (also in the 3rd edition: Fowler, Streib, & Keller, 2004), have been slightly modified in order to be more inclusive in regard to the variety of religious traditions and worldviews; for example, in question 20, the adjectives “spiritual” and “faithful” have been added; or in question 4, “image of God and relation to God” has been exchanged by “world view” in the main question, and the phrase “image of God and the Divine” has been moved to a follow-up question.

  2. 2.

    The interviews are transcribed verbatim and interacts are the single utterances of interviewer and interviewee (see Appendix B).

  3. 3.

    With more than 500 FDIs (277 from the Deconversion Project, 102 from this Spirituality Study, ca. 150 with Muslim participants in Germany and Turkey), the Bielefeld Research Center for Biographical Studies in Contemporary Religion has the privilege of owning a considerable FDI data base (probably the largest in the world) with considerable cross-cultural and cross-religious diversity.

  4. 4.

    A note on terminology: We use in this chapter and many other chapters of this book not only the term ‘style’, but also the term ‘stage.’ This is consistent with the Manual for Faith Development Research which was used for evaluation. But it is important to note that we associate with ‘stage’ not the entire set of structural-developmental assumptions, but rather understand ‘stage’ as synonymous with, or interpreted by, ‘style.’ Therefore, wherever possible and appropriate, we use both terms interchangeably or use both terms with a slash.

References

  • Cantwell Smith, W. (1963). The meaning and end of religion. Minneapolis: Fortress Press 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell Smith, W. (1979). Faith and belief. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity, youth and crisis. New York/London: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, J. W. (1980). Faith and the structuring of meaning. In C. Dykstra & S. Parks (Eds.), Faith development and fowler (pp. 15–42). Birmingham: Religious Education Press 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, J. W. (1981). Stages of faith. The psychology of human development and the quest for meaning. San Francisco: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, J. W. (1996). Pluralism and Oneness in Religious Experience: William James, Faith-Development Theory, and Clinical Practice. In E. P. Shafranske (Ed.), Religion and the clinical practice of psychology (pp. 165–186). Washington: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  •  Fowler, J. W., Streib, H., & Keller, B. (2004). Manual for faith development research. (3rd ed.) Bielefeld; Atlanta: Research Center for Biographical Studies in Contemporary Religion, Bielefeld; Center for Research in Faith and Moral Development, Emory University [available at: http://wwwhomes.uni-bielefeld.de/religionsforschung/]

  • Keller, B., Klein, C., & Streib, H. (2013). Das Interview zur Glaubensentwicklung: Zur Exploration von Spiritualität im psychotherapeutischen Setting [The faith development interview. On the exploration of spirituality in a psychotherapeutic setting]. Spiritual Care, 2, 35–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, B., & Streib, H. (2013). Faith development, religious styles and biographical narratives: Methodological perspectives. Journal of Empirical Theology, 26, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1984). Essays on moral development, Vol. II. The psychology of moral development. San Francisco: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L., Levine, C., & Hewer, A. (1983). The current formulation of the theory. In L. Kohlberg (Ed.), Essays on moral development, Vol. II. The psychology of moral development (pp. 212–319). San Francisco: Harper & Row 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, D. J. (1978). The seasons of a man’s live. New York: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moseley, R. M., Jarvis, D., & Fowler, J. W. (1986). Manual for faith development research. Atlanta: Center for Faith Development, Emory University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niebuhr, H. R. (1943). Radical monotheism and western culture. New York: Harper & Row 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oser, F. K., & Gmünder, P. (1984). Der Mensch—Stufen seiner religiösen Entwicklung. Ein strukturgenetischer Ansatz [The human being—Stages of his religious development. A structural-genetic approach]. Zürich/Köln: Benzinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1926). La représentation du monde chez l’enfant. Paris: F. Alan. [English translation: The child’s conception of the world. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul].

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzuto, A. M. (1979). The birth of the living God. A psychoanalytic study. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streib, H. (1991). Hermeneutics of metaphor, symbol and narrative in faith development theory. Ph.D. dissertation (Emory University) (European University Studies, Ser. 23, Vol. 408). Frankfurt/M.: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streib, H. (2001). Faith development theory revisited: The religious styles perspective. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 11, 143–158. doi:10.1207/S15327582IJPR1103_02

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streib, H. (2003a). Faith development research at twenty years. In R. R. Osmer & F. Schweitzer (eds), Developing a public faith: new directions in practical theology. Essays in honor of James. W. Fowler (pp. 15–42). St. Louis: Chalice Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streib, H. (2003b). Religion as a question of style: Revising the structural differentiation of religion from the perspective of the analysis of the contemporary pluralistic-religious situation. International Journal for Practical Theology, 7, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streib, H. (2003c). Variety and complexity of religious development: Perspectives for the 21st Century. In P. H. M. P. Roelofsma, J. M. T. Corveleyn, & J. W. Van Saane (Eds.), One hundred years of psychology of religion. Issues and trends in a century long quest (pp. 123–138). Amsterdam: Free University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streib, H. (2005). Faith development research revisited: Accounting for diversity in structure, content, and narrativity of faith. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 15, 99–121. doi:10.1207/s15327582ijpr1502_1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streib, H. (2013). Conceptualisation et mesure du développement religieux en termes de schémas et de styles religieux—Résultats et nouvelles considérations [Conceptualization and measurement of religious development in terms of religious schemata and religious styles]. In P.-Y. Brandt & J. M. Day (Eds.), Psychologie du développement religieux: questions classiques et perspectives contemporaines (pp. 39–76). Geneva: Labor et Fides.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streib, H., Hood, R. W., Keller, B., Csöff, R.-M., & Silver, C. (2009). Deconversion. Qualitative and quantitative results from cross-cultural research in Germany and the United States of America. Research in Contemporary Religion; 5, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streib, H., Hood, R. W., & Klein, C. (2010). The Religious Schema Scale: Construction and initial validation of a quantitative measure for religious styles. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 20, 151–172. doi:10.1080/10508619.2010.481223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tillich, P. (1957). Dynamics of faith. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heinz Streib .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Streib, H., Wollert, M., Keller, B. (2016). The Faith Development Interview: Methodological Considerations. In: Streib, H., Hood, Jr., R. (eds) Semantics and Psychology of Spirituality. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21245-6_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics