Abstract
In many of our discussions with police officers from around the world, we acknowledge that policing as a public service is stuck in its fire brigade solutions to people’s needs. Pressures and demands—coupled with decreasing public resources—are funnelled through an old style of working. Answering call after call for help, with a mix of experienced people responding to those calls, does not always add up to a formula for sharing best practice. Working to promote a collective understanding of why there needs to be a way of consolidating best practice for common problems enables a shared approach to the logic of problem solving.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Stanko would like to thank Commissioner Sir Bernard Hogan Howe for this insight.
- 2.
Readers are invited to consult the Global Policing Database (appearing on the London Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime from April 1, 2015 https://www.london.gov.uk/media/mayor-pressreleases/2015/07/new-database-brings-together-65-years-of-policing-research-from).
References
Goldstein, H. (1990). Problem-oriented policing. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
Taylor, B., Boba, R., & Egge, J. (2013). The integration of crime analysis into patrol work: A guidebook. Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, U.S. Department of Justice.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stanko, E.A., Dawson, P. (2016). Step Two: Recognising the Usefulness of the Logic of Problem Solving. In: Police Use of Research Evidence. SpringerBriefs in Criminology(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20648-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20648-6_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20647-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20648-6
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)