Skip to main content

Heroic Rescue in Humans

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science

Synonyms

Courageous rescue; Dangerous rescue; Daring rescue; Heroism; High-risk rescue

Definition

“Heroic rescue” occurs when an individual places himself/herself at risk to save another person in a life-threatening emergency situation.

Introduction

When defining altruism, social scientists usually focus on the intentions of the altruist, and their research has traditionally attempted to isolate the situational factors that determine when people will behave altruistically. Five decades of research have identified the importance of such factors as empathy, rewards, emotional states, social norms, and the number of bystanders in influencing helping behavior. Social science models of altruism do not address the question of why basic motives such as empathy and various situational factors came to be so important. In fact, even most social psychologists continue to study altruism and other social behaviors with little reference to the origins and ultimate functions of altruism, which have...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bereczkei, T., Birkas, B., & Kerekes, Z. (2010). Altruism toward strangers in need: Costly signaling in an industrial society. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 95–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bliege Bird, R. B., & Smith, E. A. (2005). Signaling theory, strategic interaction, and symbolic capital. Current Anthropology, 46, 221–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boone, J. L. (1998). The evolution of magnanimity: When is it better to give than to receive? Human Nature, 9, 1–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. M., & Moore, C. (2000). Is prospective altruist-detection an evolved solution to the adaptive problem of subtle cheating in cooperative ventures? Supportive evidence using the Wason Selection Task. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21, 25–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chagnon, N. A. (2013). The Yanomamo (6th ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrelly, D., Lazarus, J., & Roberts, G. (2007). Altruists attract. Evolutionary Psychology, 5, 313–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farthing, G. W. (2005). Attitudes toward heroic and nonheroic physical risk takers as mates and as friends. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 171–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grafen, A. (1990). Biological signals as handicaps. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 144, 517–546.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Sundie, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Miller, G. F., & Kenrick, D. T. (2007). Blatant benevolence and conspicuous consumption. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 85–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical theory of social behavior. I and II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, C., & van Vugt, M. (2006). Nice guys finish first: The competitive altruism hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1402–1413.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Iredale, W., & van Vugt, M. (2009). The peacock’s tail of altruism. The Psychologist, 22, 938–941.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iredale, W., Van Vugt, M., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2008). Showing off in humans: Male generosity as a mating signal. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 386–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, S., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2001). Who dares, wins. Heroism versus altruism in women’s mate choice. Human Nature, 12, 89–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, M. (2005). Who are the heroes? Characteristics of people who rescue others. Journal of Cultural and Evolutionary Psychology, 3, 239–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAndrew, F. T. (2002). New evolutionary perspectives on altruism: Multilevel-selection and costly-signaling theories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 79–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAndrew, F. T., & Perilloux, C. (2012a). Is self-sacrificial competitive altruism primarily a male activity? Evolutionary Psychology, 10, 50–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McAndrew, F. T., & Perilloux, C. (2012b). The selfish hero: A study of the individual benefits of self-sacrificial prosocial behavior. Psychological Reports, 111, 27–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mealey, L., Daood, C., & Krage, M. (1996). Enhanced memory for faces of cheaters. Evolution and Human Behavior, 17, 119–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, M. A., & Sigmund, K. (2005). Evolution of indirect reciprocity. Nature, 437, 1291–1298.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Philbrick, N. (2010). The last stand: Custer, sitting bull, and the battle of the little bighorn. New York: Viking Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, G. (1998). Competitive altruism: From reciprocity to the handicap principle. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 265, 427–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rusch, H., Leunissen, J. M., & van Vugt, M. (2015). Historical and experimental evidence of sexual selection for war heroism. Evolution and Human Behavior, 36, 367–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sylwester, K., & Pawlowski, B. (2011). Daring to be darling: Attractiveness of risk takers as partners in long- and short-term sexual relationships. Sex Roles, 64, 695–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sylwester, K., & Roberts, G. (2010). Cooperators benefit through reputation-based partner choice in economic games. Biology Letters, 6, 659–662.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2010). Groups in mind: The coalitional roots of war and morality. In H. Høgh-Olson (Ed.), Human morality and sociality: Evolutionary & comparative perspectives (pp. 191–234). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology, 46, 35–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Vugt, M., & Hardy, C. L. (2010). Cooperation for reputation: Wasteful contributions as costly signals in public goods. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 13, 101–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Vugt, M., David De Cremer, D., & Janssen, D. P. (2007). Gender differences in cooperation and competition: The male-warrior hypothesis. Psychological Science, 18, 19–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Willer, R. (2009). Groups reward individual sacrifice: The status solution to the collective action problem. American Sociological Review, 74, 23–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wingfield, J. C., Hegner, R. E., Dufty, A. M., Jr., & Ball, G. F. (1990). The “challenge hypothesis”: Theoretical implications for patterns of testosterone secretion, mating systems, and breeding strategies. American Naturalist, 136, 829–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi, A. (1977). Reliability in communication systems and the evolution of altruism. In B. Stonehouse & C. M. Perrins (Eds.), Evolutionary ecology (pp. 253–259). London: MacMillan Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francis T McAndrew .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

McAndrew, F.T. (2021). Heroic Rescue in Humans. In: Shackelford, T.K., Weekes-Shackelford, V.A. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19650-3_1558

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics