Skip to main content

Bonds Between \(L\)-Fuzzy Contexts Over Different Structures of Truth-Degrees

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Formal Concept Analysis (ICFCA 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9113))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 891 Accesses

Abstract

We consider the problem of bonds between \(L\)-fuzzy contexts over different complete residuated lattices. For this purpose we define \((l,k)\)-connection and dual \((l,k)\)-connection – pairs of mappings between the residuated lattices based on Krupka’s results on factorizations of complete residuated lattices. We show that the bonds defined using the dual \((l,k)\)-connection have very natural properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See [12] for motivations of the present research.

  2. 2.

    The notion of L-bond was introduced in [11]; however we adapt its definition the same way as in [8, 9].

  3. 3.

    In this section, we consistently denote dual \((l,k)\)-connections by prime, as \(\langle {\lambda ',\kappa '}\rangle \), to distinguish them from the non-dual \((l,k)\)-connections introduced in the previous section.

  4. 4.

    In this section \(\langle {\lambda ,\kappa }\rangle \) always denotes a dual \((l,k)\)-connection.

  5. 5.

    By \({\mathrm {proj}}_1\) and \({\mathrm {proj}}_2\) we denote projection of first and second entry of a pair, respectively; i.e. \({\mathrm {proj}}_1(\langle {a_1,a_2}\rangle ) \mapsto a_1, {\mathrm {proj}}_2(\langle {a_1,a_2}\rangle ) \mapsto a_2\).

References

  1. Bartl, E., Belohlavek, R.: Reducing sup-t-norm and inf-residuum to a single type of fuzzy relational equations. In: 2011 Annual Meeting of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society (NAFIPS), pp. 1–5 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Belohlavek, R.: Fuzzy Galois connections. Math. Log. Q. 45(4), 497–504 (1999)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Belohlavek, R.: Optimal decompositions of matrices with entries from residuated lattices. J. Log. Comput. (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Belohlavek, R.: Sup-t-norm and inf-residuum are one type of relational product: unifying framework and consequences. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 197, 45–58 (2012)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Belohlavek, R., Vychodil, V.: What is a fuzzy concept lattice? In: Proceedings of CLA 2005, 3rd International Conference on Concept Lattices and Their Applications, pp. 34–45 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Belohlavek, R., Vychodil, V.: Residuated lattices of size\(\,\leqslant \,\)12. Order 27(2), 147–161 (2010)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Kohout, L.J., Bandler, W.: Relational-product architectures for information processing. Inf. Sci. 37(1–3), 25–37 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Konecny, J.: Antitone L-bonds. In: IPMU, pp. 71–80 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Konecny, J., Ojeda-Aciego, M.: Isotone L-bonds. In: Ojeda-Aciego, M., Outrata, J., (eds.) CLA. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 1062, pp. 153–162 (2013). CEUR-WS.org

  10. Krajči, S.: A generalized concept lattice. Log. J. IGPL 13(5), 543–550 (2005)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Krídlo, O., Krajči, S., Ojeda-Aciego, M.: The category of L-chu correspondences and the structure of L-bonds. Fundam. Inform. 115(4), 297–325 (2012)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Kridlo, O., Ojeda-Aciego, M.: CRL-chu correspondences. In: Ojeda-Aciego, M., Outrata, J., (eds.) CLA. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 1062, pp. 105–116 (2013). CEUR-WS.org

  13. Krupka, M.: Factorization of residuated lattices. Log. J. IGPL 17(2), 205–223 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Medina, J., Ojeda-Aciego, M., Ruiz-Calviño, J.: Formal concept analysis via multi-adjoint concept lattices. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 160(2), 130–144 (2009)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Pollandt, S.: Fuzzy Begriffe: Formale Begriffsanalyse von unscharfen Daten. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author thanks to Ondrej Kridlo for valuable consultations.

Supported by grant No. 15-17899S, “Decompositions of Matrices with Boolean and Ordinal Data: Theory and Algorithms", of the Czech Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Konecny .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Konecny, J. (2015). Bonds Between \(L\)-Fuzzy Contexts Over Different Structures of Truth-Degrees. In: Baixeries, J., Sacarea, C., Ojeda-Aciego, M. (eds) Formal Concept Analysis. ICFCA 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9113. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19545-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19545-2_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19544-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19545-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics