Skip to main content

Management of Early-Stage and Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Gynecology
  • 1916 Accesses

Abstract

Carcinoma of the cervix remains a significant health problem for women worldwide. However, the use of a multidisciplinary approach to the treatment of cervical cancer has led to a marked improvement in patient outcomes. It has been demonstrated that early-stage cervical cancer can be effectively treated with radical surgery or definitive radiotherapy, which achieve similar survival outcomes. To reduce the frequency of postoperative complications, less invasive surgical procedures involving laparoscopic or robotic approaches have been introduced. Moreover, for patients who wish to preserve their fertility, fertility-preserving surgery has been developed. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with a platinum-based agent is the recommended treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer. The standard concurrent chemotherapy regimen involves the administration of single-agent cisplatin at a weekly dose of 40 mg/m2 during external beam radiotherapy. Overall, when added to radiotherapy, cisplatin was demonstrated to reduce the risk of death from cervical cancer; i.e., it resulted in an absolute overall survival benefit of 10%. In this chapter, we summarize the current management strategies for early and locally advanced cervical carcinoma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 699.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baek MH, Park JY, Kim D, Suh DS, Kim JH, Kim YM, Kim YT, Nam JH. Comparison of adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma in patients with early-stage cervical cancer after radical surgery. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;135(3):462–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Benedet JL, Anderson GH. Stage IA carcinoma of the cervix revisited. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;87(6):1052–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley SL, Tritz DM, Van Le L, Higgins R, Sevin BU, Ueland FR, DePriest PD, Gallion HH, Bailey CL, Kryscio RJ, Fowler W, Averette H, van Nagell JR. Lymph node metastases and prognosis in patients with stage IA2 cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 1996;63(1):4–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ceballos KM, Shaw D, Daya D. Microinvasive cervical adenocarcinoma (FIGO stage 1A tumors): results of surgical staging and outcome analysis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2006;30(3):370–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado G, Bundy B, Zaino R, Sevin BU, Creasman WT, Major F. Prospective surgical-pathological study of disease-free interval in patients with stage IB squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 1990;38(3):352–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eifel PJ, Winter K, Morris M, Levenback C, Grigsby PW, Cooper J, Rotman M, Gershenson D, Mutch DG. Pelvic irradiation with concurrent chemotherapy versus pelvic and para-aortic irradiation for high-risk cervical cancer: an update of radiation therapy oncology group trial (RTOG) 90–01. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(5):872–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott P, Coppleson M, Russell P, Liouros P, Carter J, MacLeod C, Jones M. Early invasive (FIGO stage IA) carcinoma of the cervix: a clinico-pathologic study of 476 cases. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2000;10(1):42–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller AF, Elliott N, Kosloff C, Hoskins WJ, Lewis JL. Determinants of increased risk for recurrence in patients undergoing radical hysterectomy for stage IB and IIA carcinoma of the cervix. Gynecol Oncol. 1989;33(1):34–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geetha P, Nair MK. Laparoscopic, robotic and open method of radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a systematic review. J Minim Access Surg. 2012;8(3):67–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Grigiene R, Valuckas KP, Aleknavicius E, Kurtinaitis J, Letautiene SR. The value of prognostic factors for uterine cervical cancer patients treated with irradiation alone. BMC Cancer. 2007;7(1):234.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hirai Y, Takeshima N, Tate S, Akiyama F, Furuta R, Hasumi K. Early invasive cervical adenocarcinoma: its potential for nodal metastasis or recurrence. BJOG. 2003;110(3):241–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kadkhodayan S, Hasanzadeh M, Treglia G, Azad A, Yousefi Z, Zarifmahmoudi L, Sadeghi R. Sentinel node biopsy for lymph nodal staging of uterine cervix cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the pertinent literature. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015;41(1):1–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kamura T, Tsukamoto N, Tsuruchi N, Saito T, Matsuyama T, Akazawa K, Nakano H. Multivariate analysis of the histopathologic prognostic factors of cervical cancer in patients undergoing radical hysterectomy. Cancer. 1992;69(1):181–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kasamatsu T, Okada S, Tsuda H, Shiromizu K, Yamada T, Tsunematsu R, Ohmi K. Early invasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: criteria for nonradical surgical treatment. Gynecol Oncol. 2002;85(2):327–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kasamatsu T, Onda T, Sawada M, Kato T, Ikeda S, Sasajima Y, Tsuda H. Radical hysterectomy for FIGO stage I-IIB adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. Br J Cancer. 2009;100(9):1400–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kato T, Takashima A, Kasamatsu T, Nakamura K, Mizusawa J, Nakanishi T, Takeshima N, Kamiura S, Onda T, Sumi T, Takano M, Nakai H, Saito T, Fujiwara K, Yokoyama M, Itamochi H, Takehara K, Yokota H, Mizunoe T, Takeda S, Sonoda K, Shiozawa T, Kawabata T, Honma S, Fukuda H, Yaegashi N, Yoshikawa H, Konishi I, Kamura T, Group GOSGotJCO. Clinical tumor diameter and prognosis of patients with FIGO stage IB1 cervical cancer (JCOG0806-A). Gynecol Oncol. 2015;137(1):34–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keys HM, Bundy BN, Stehman FB, Muderspach LI, Chafe WE, Suggs CL, Walker JL, Gersell D. Cisplatin, radiation, and adjuvant hysterectomy compared with radiation and adjuvant hysterectomy for bulky stage IB cervical carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(15):1154–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim K, Kang SB, Chung HH, Kim JW, Park NH, Song YS. Comparison of chemoradiation with radiation as postoperative adjuvant therapy in cervical cancer patients with intermediate-risk factors. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009;35(2):192–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuji S, Hirashima Y, Nakayama H, Nishio S, Otsuki T, Nagamitsu Y, Tanaka N, Ito K, Teramoto N, Yamada T. Diagnosis, clinicopathologic features, treatment, and prognosis of small cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix; Kansai Clinical Oncology Group/Intergroup study in Japan. Gynecol Oncol. 2013;129(3):522–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Landoni F, Maneo A, Colombo A, Placa F, Milani R, Perego P, Favini G, Ferri L, Mangioni C. Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib-IIa cervical cancer. Lancet. 1997;350(9077):535–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Landoni F, Maneo A, Cormio G, Perego P, Milani R, Caruso O, Mangioni C. Class II versus class III radical hysterectomy in stage IB-IIA cervical cancer: a prospective randomized study. Gynecol Oncol. 2001;80(1):3–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Landoni F, Maneo A, Zapardiel I, Zanagnolo V, Mangioni C. Class I versus class III radical hysterectomy in stage IB1-IIA cervical cancer. A prospective randomized study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012;38(3):203–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lécuru F, Mathevet P, Querleu D, Leblanc E, Morice P, Daraï E, Marret H, Magaud L, Gillaizeau F, Chatellier G, Dargent D. Bilateral negative sentinel nodes accurately predict absence of lymph node metastasis in early cervical cancer: results of the SENTICOL study. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(13):1686–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee KB, Lee JM, Park CY, Cho HY, Ha SY. Lymph node metastasis and lymph vascular space invasion in microinvasive squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006;16(3):1184–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mabuchi S, Okazawa M, Isohashi F, Matsuo K, Ohta Y, Suzuki O, Yoshioka Y, Enomoto T, Kamiura S, Kimura T. Radical hysterectomy with adjuvant radiotherapy versus definitive radiotherapy alone for FIGO stage IIB cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;123(2):241–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mabuchi S, Okazawa M, Matsuo K, Kawano M, Suzuki O, Miyatake T, Enomoto T, Kamiura S, Ogawa K, Kimura T. Impact of histological subtype on survival of patients with surgically-treated stage IA2-IIB cervical cancer: adenocarcinoma versus squamous cell carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2012a;127(2):114–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mabuchi S, Okazawa M, Kinose Y, Matsuo K, Fujiwara M, Suzuki O, Morii E, Kamiura S, Ogawa K, Kimura T. Comparison of the prognoses of FIGO stage I to stage II adenosquamous carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix treated with radical hysterectomy. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2012b;22(8):1389–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mabuchi S, Matsumoto Y, Kawano M, Minami K, Seo Y, Sasano T, Takahashi R, Kuroda H, Hisamatsu T, Kakigano A, Hayashi M, Sawada K, Hamasaki T, Morii E, Kurachi H, Matsuura N, Kimura T. Uterine cervical cancer displaying tumor-related leukocytosis: a distinct clinical entity with radioresistant feature. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106(7):dju147.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morris M, Eifel PJ, Lu J, Grigsby PW, Levenback C, Stevens RE, Rotman M, Gershenson DM, Mutch DG. Pelvic radiation with concurrent chemotherapy compared with pelvic and para-aortic radiation for high-risk cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(15):1137–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nam JH, Park JY, Kim DY, Kim JH, Kim YM, Kim YT. Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: long-term survival outcomes in a matched cohort study. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(4):903–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Obermair A, Gebski V, Frumovitz M, Soliman PT, Schmeler KM, Levenback C, Ramirez PT. A phase III randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic or robotic radical hysterectomy with abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15(5):584–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Okazawa M, Mabuchi S, Isohashi F, Suzuki O, Ohta Y, Fujita M, Yoshino K, Enomoto T, Kamiura S, Kimura T. The prognostic significance of multiple pelvic node metastases in cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy plus adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2012;22(3):490–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Okazawa M, Mabuchi S, Isohashi F, Suzuki O, Yoshioka Y, Sasano T, Ohta Y, Kamiura S, Ogawa K, Kimura T. Impact of the addition of concurrent chemotherapy to pelvic radiotherapy in surgically treated stage IB1-IIB cervical cancer patients with intermediate-risk or high-risk factors: a 13-year experience. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2013;23(3):567–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Park JY, Kim DY, Kim JH, Kim YM, Kim YT, Nam JH. Outcomes after radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage adenocarcinoma of uterine cervix. Br J Cancer. 2010;102(12):1692–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Perez CA, Camel HM, Kao MS, Hederman MA. Randomized study of preoperative radiation and surgery or irradiation alone in the treatment of stage IB and IIA carcinoma of the uterine cervix: final report. Gynecol Oncol. 1987;27(2):129–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perez CA, Grigsby PW, Castro-Vita H, Lockett MA. Carcinoma of the uterine cervix. I. Impact of prolongation of overall treatment time and timing of brachytherapy on outcome of radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;32(5):1275–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peters WA, Liu PY, Barrett RJ, Stock RJ, Monk BJ, Berek JS, Souhami L, Grigsby P, Gordon W, Alberts DS. Concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy compared with pelvic radiation therapy alone as adjuvant therapy after radical surgery in high-risk early-stage cancer of the cervix. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(8):1606–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Poynor EA, Marshall D, Sonoda Y, Slomovitz BM, Barakat RR, Soslow RA. Clinicopathologic features of early adenocarcinoma of the cervix initially managed with cervical conization. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;103(3):960–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds EA, Tierney K, Keeney GL, Felix JC, Weaver AL, Roman LD, Cliby WA. Analysis of outcomes of microinvasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix by treatment type. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(5):1150–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rose PG, Bundy BN, Watkins EB, Thigpen JT, Deppe G, Maiman MA, Clarke-Pearson DL, Insalaco S. Concurrent cisplatin-based radiotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(15):1144–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rose PG, Java JJ, Whitney CW, Stehman FB, Lanciano R, Thomas GM. Locally advanced adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinomas of the cervix compared to squamous cell carcinomas of the cervix in gynecologic oncology group trials of cisplatin-based chemoradiation. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;135(2):208–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rotman M, Pajak TF, Choi K, Clery M, Marcial V, Grigsby PW, Cooper J, John M. Prophylactic extended-field irradiation of para-aortic lymph nodes in stages IIB and bulky IB and IIA cervical carcinomas. Ten-year treatment results of RTOG 79–20. JAMA. 1995;274(5):387–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rotman M, Sedlis A, Piedmonte MR, Bundy B, Lentz SS, Muderspach LI, Zaino RJ. A phase III randomized trial of postoperative pelvic irradiation in stage IB cervical carcinoma with poor prognostic features: follow-up of a gynecologic oncology group study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;65(1):169–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rydzewska L, Tierney J, Vale CL, Symonds PR.Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery versus surgery for cervical cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;12:CD007406. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD007406.pub3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selman TJ, Mann C, Zamora J, Appleyard TL, Khan K. Diagnostic accuracy of tests for lymph node status in primary cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2008;178(7):855–62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Serkies K, Badzio A, Jassem J. Clinical relevance of hemoglobin level in cervical cancer patients administered definitive radiotherapy. Acta Oncol. 2006;45(6):695–701.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Meurs H, Visser O, Buist MR, Ten Kate FJ, van der Velden J. Frequency of pelvic lymph node metastases and parametrial involvement in stage IA2 cervical cancer: a population-based study and literature review. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009;19(1):21–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Nagell JR, Powell DE, Gallion HH, Elliott DG, Donaldson ES, Carpenter AE, Higgins RV, Kryscio R, Pavlik EJ. Small cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Cancer. 1988;62(8):1586–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whitney CW, Sause W, Bundy BN, Malfetano JH, Hannigan EV, Fowler WC, Clarke-Pearson DL, Liao SY. Randomized comparison of fluorouracil plus cisplatin versus hydroxyurea as an adjunct to radiation therapy in stage IIB-IVA carcinoma of the cervix with negative para-aortic lymph nodes: a Gynecologic Oncology Group and Southwest Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17(5):1339–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wright JD, NathavithArana R, Nathavithrana R, Lewin SN, Sun X, Deutsch I, Burke WM, Herzog TJ. Fertility-conserving surgery for young women with stage IA1 cervical cancer: safety and access. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115(3):585–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seiji Mabuchi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Mabuchi, S., Kawano, M., Sasano, T., Kuroda, H. (2017). Management of Early-Stage and Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer. In: Shoupe, D. (eds) Handbook of Gynecology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17798-4_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17798-4_34

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17797-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17798-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics