Skip to main content

Market Orientation and Performance: The Australian Public Sector Experience

  • Conference paper
Proceedings of the 1997 World Marketing Congress

Abstract

Marketing academics and practitioners assume a direct link between market orientation and performance. This paper discusses the concepts of market orientation and performance and identifies suitable instruments to investigate this relationship in the Australian public sector. The findings confirm a positive relationship between these two constructs. Implications are drawn and directions for future research are discussed.

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Armstrong J. S., Overton T. S., (1977), Estimating non response bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research. XIV. August, 396-42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourn J., (1992), Evaluating the performance of central government, in Plooitt C, Harrison S., Handbook of Public Service Management. Blackwell: Massachusetts, 25

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill G. A. Jr., (1979), A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs, Journal of Marketing Research. XVI, February, 64-73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill G.A. Jr., Peter J. P., (1984), “Research design effects on the reliability of rating scales: A meta analysis”, Journal of Marketing Research. XXI, November, 360-375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly T., Conlon E. J., Deutsch S J., (198), Organizational effectiveness: A multiple consistency Approach. Academy of Management Review. 5, May, 223-236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J., (1951), Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests. Psychometrika. 16, 3, September, 297-333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deshpandé R., Farley J. U., Webster F. E. Jr., (1993), Corporate culture, customer orientation and innovativeness in Japanese firms: A quadrad analysis. Journal of Marketing. 57, January, 23-37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dess G. G., Robinson R. B., (1984), Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit, Strategic Management Journal. 5, Jul-Sep, 265-273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni A., (1964), Modern organizations. Prentice - Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisk, R.P., Brown, S.W. and Bitner, M.J., (1994), “Tracking the evolution of the services marketing literature”. Journal of Retailing. Vol. 69, No. 1, Spring, 61-103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgopolous B. S. Tannenbaum A. S. (1957), The study of organizational effectiveness, American Sociological Review, 22, October, 534-54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham P., (1995), Are public sector organizations becoming customer oriented?. Marketing Intelligence and Planning. 13,1, 35-47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grönroos C, (1991) The marketing Strategy Continuum: Towards a marketing concept for the 199’s. Management Decisions. 29. 1, 7-13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes R. A, Abernathy N. J, (1980), Managing our way to economic decline, Harvard Business Review. Jul-Aug, 67-77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hensher D. A., Waters W. G., (1993), Using Total Factor productivity and Data envelopment Analysis for performance comparisons among government enterprises: Concepts and Issues, Institute of Transport Studies Working paper 1, Graduate School of Business, University of Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofer C. W., Sandberg W. R., (1987), Improving new venture performance: some guidelines for success, American Journal of Small Business. 12, (Summer), pp 11-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston F. S, (1986), The marketing concept: What it is and what it is not. Journal of Marketing. 5, April, 81-87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski B. J., Kohli A. K., (1993), Marketing orientation: Antecedents and consequences, Journal of Marketing. 57, July, 53-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor A. G., (1971), Imbricative marketing. Journal of Marketing. 35, April, 19-25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan R. S., (1983), Measuring manufacturing performance: A new challenge for managerial accounting research, The Accounting Review. 58, October 686-75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohli A. K., Jaworski B. J., (1990), Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications, Journal of Marketing. Vol. 54, April, 1-18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohli A. K., Jaworski B. J., Kumar A., (1993), MARKOR: A measure of market orientation, Journal of Market Research. XXX, November, 467-477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler P., (1972), A generic concept of Marketing. Journal of Marketing. 35, April, 46-54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler P., (1991), Marketing Management -Analysis. Planning. Implementation and Contro/. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 7ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee L. W., Spiro R. L., (1988), The marketing concept in perspective, Business Horizons, 31, May-Jun,. 3, 4-45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg H., (1996), Managing Government Governing Management, Harvard Business Review. May/June, 75-83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narver J. C, Park S. Y., Slater S. F., (1992), Relative Emphasis in a market orientation and its effect on business profitability, AMA Summer Educators Conference proceedings. Chicago: American Marketing Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narver J. C., Slater S. F., (1990), The effect of a market orientation on business philosophy, Journal of Marketing. 54, October, 2-35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally J. C, (1978), Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw Hill, 2 ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce J. A., Robbins D. K., Robinson R. B., (1987), The impact of grand strategy and planning formality on Financial performance. Strategic Management Journal. 8, Mar-Apr, 125-134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennings J. M., Goodman P. S., (1977), Toward a workable framework, in Goodman P. S. and Pennings J. M. (eds). New perspectives on organizational effectiveness. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, 146-184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pefers T. J., Waterman R. H., (1982). In search of Excellence. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer J., Salancik G., (1978). The external control of organizations. Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitt L., Caruana A, Berthon P. R, (1996), Market orientation and business performance: some European evidence,. International Marketing Review. 13, 1,5-18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberto E., (1992), Applying a Marketing Model in the Public Sector in O’Faircheallaigh C, Graham P, and Warburton J, Service Delivery and Public Sector Marketing. Australia: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruekert R. W., (1992), Developing a market orientation: An organisational strategy perspective, International Journal of Research in Marketing. 9, No. 3, 225-245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runyon K. E., (1980), Consumer Behaviour. 2ed., Ohio: Bell & Howell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro B. P, (1988), What the hell is ‘Market oriented’, Harvard Business Review. 6, Nov-Dec, 119-125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steers R. M., (1975), Problems in the measurement of organizational effectiveness Administrative Science Quarterly, 2, (December), 546-558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson J. D., (1967), Organizations in Action, McGraw Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatraman N., Ramanujam V., (1986), Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches, Academy of Management Review, 11, October, 81-814.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh K. (1994) Marketing and Public Sector Management, European Journal of Marketing. 28,3,63-71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster F. E. Jr., (1988), The rediscovery of the marketing concept. Business Horizons. 31, May-Jun, 3,29-39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster F. E. Jr., (1992), The changing role of marketing in the corporation, Journal of Marketing. 56, October, 1-17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuchtman E., Seashore S. E., (1967), A system resource approach to organizational effectiveness, American Sociological Review. 32, December, 891-93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Academy of Marketing Science

About this paper

Cite this paper

Caruana, A., Ramaseshan, B., Ewing, M.T. (2015). Market Orientation and Performance: The Australian Public Sector Experience. In: Sidin, S., Manrai, A. (eds) Proceedings of the 1997 World Marketing Congress. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17320-7_153

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics