Definition
An overreliance on experimental methods in psychology comes with its problems of low context sensitivity, ecological invalidity, and limited scope of study. A move towards interdisciplinarity and methodological pluralism, along with an increased attention to the cultural context of behavior, can give greater validity to its findings, making psychology a more robust science.
Introduction
Gordon W. Allport, in his Presidential address at the 47th Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association (1939), discussed the results of a survey they had conducted. It showed an increasingly empirical, mechanistic, quantitative, and analytic focus in the field of psychology. He warned against a “slavish subservience” to such a paradigm, pointing out how as a science, psychology, and...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Allport, G. W. (1940). The psychologist’s frame of reference. Psychological Bulletin, 37(1), 1–28.
Astuti, R. (2015). Implicit and explicit theory of mind. Anthropology of This Century, 13, 636–650.
Baumard, N. (2016). The origins of fairness: How evolution explains our moral nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bender, A., Hutchins, E., & Medin, D. (2010). Anthropology in cognitive science. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(3), 374–385.
Bernard, H. R. (1994). Research methods in anthropology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Bernard, H. R., & Gravlee, C. C. (Eds.). (2014). Handbook of methods in cultural anthropology. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Bloch, M. (1991). Language, anthropology and cognitive science. Man, 26(2), 183–198. JSTOR.
Bock, P. K. (1988). Rethinking psychological anthropology: Continuity and change in the study of human action (pp. xii, 254). New York, NY: W H Freeman/Times Books/Henry Holt & Co.
Boduroglu, A., Shah, P., & Nisbett, R. E. (2009). Cultural differences in allocation of attention in visual information processing. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40(3), 349–360.
Boroditsky, L. (2001). Does language shape thought?: Mandarin and English speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43(1), 1–22.
Brunswik, E. (1956). Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Butterfill, S. A., & Apperly, I. A. (2013). How to construct a minimal theory of mind. Mind & Language, 28(5), 606–637.
Chua, H. F., Boland, J. E., & Nisbett, R. E. (2005). Cultural variation in eye movements during scene perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(35), 12629–12633.
Cole, M. (1967). The new mathematics and an old culture: A study of learning among the Kpelle of Liberia. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Cole, M. (n.d.). The illusion of culture-free intelligence testing. Retrieved from http://lchc.ucsd.edu/MCA/Paper/Cole/iq.html
Cronk, L. (1991). Human behavioral ecology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 20(1), 25–53.
D’Andrade, R. G. (1981). The cultural part of cognition. Cognitive Science, 5(3), 179–195.
Durrant, R., & Ward, T. (2015). Evolutionary criminology: Towards a comprehensive explanation of crime. London: Academic.
Elmes, D. G., Kantowitz, B. H., & Roediger III, H. L. (2011). Research methods in psychology. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
Fish, J. M. (2000). What anthropology can do for psychology: Facing physics Envy, ethnocentrism, and a belief in “Race”. American Anthropologist, 102(3), 552–563. JSTOR.
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., McElreath, R., Alvard, M., Barr, A., Ensminger, J., Henrich, N. S., Hill, K., Gil-White, F., Gurven, M., Marlowe, F. W., Patton, J. Q., & Tracer, D. (2005). “Economic man” in cross-cultural perspective: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(6), 795–815.
Howitt, D., & Cramer, D. (2007). Introduction to research methods in psychology. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Huemer, M., Perner, J., & Leahy, B. (2018). Mental files theory of mind: When do children consider agents acquainted with different object identities? Cognition, 171, 122–129.
Kim, H., & Markus, H. R. (1999). Deviance or uniqueness, harmony or conformity? A cultural analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(4), 785–800.
Krull, D. S., Loy, M. H. M., Lin, J., Wang, C. F., Chen, S., & Zhao, X. (1999). The fundamental fundamental attribution error: Correspondence bias in individualist and collectivist cultures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(10), 1208–1219.
List, J. A. (2006). The Behavioralist meets the market: Measuring social preferences and reputation effects in actual transactions. Journal of Political Economy, 114(1), 1–37.
Mattingly, C., Lutkehaus, N. C., & Throop, C. J. (2008). Bruner’s search for meaning: A conversation between psychology and anthropology. Ethos, 36(1), 1–28.
Mayer, A., & Träuble, B. (2015). The weird world of cross-cultural false-belief research: A true- and false-belief study among Samoan children based on commands. Journal of Cognition and Development, 16(4), 650–665.
Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality: Principles and implications of cognitive psychology. San Francisco: Freeman.
Nettle, D. (2012). Behavior of parents and children in two contrasting urban neighborhoods: An observational study. Journal of Ethology, 30(1), 109–116.
Nettle, D., Gibson, M. A., Lawson, D. W., & Sear, R. (2013). Human behavioral ecology: Current research and future prospects. Behavioral Ecology, 24(5), 1031–1040.
Nisbett, R. E., & Masuda, T. (2003). Culture and point of view. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(19), 11163–11170.
Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108(2), 291–310.
Robbins, J., & Rumsey, A. (2008). Introduction: Cultural and linguistic anthropology and the opacity of other minds. Anthropological Quarterly, 81(2), 407–420. JSTOR.
Roe, B. E., & Just, D. R. (2009). Internal and external validity in economics research: Tradeoffs between experiments, field experiments, natural experiments, and field data. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 91(5), 1266–1271.
Rozin, P. (2001). Social psychology and science: Some lessons from Solomon Asch. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(1), 2–14.
Schmuckler, M. A. (2001). What is ecological validity? A dimensional analysis. Infancy, 2(4), 419–436.
Smith, J. A., Harre, R., & Langenhove, L. V. (1995). Rethinking methods in psychology. London: Sage.
Winterhalder, B., & Smith, E. A. (2000). Analyzing adaptive strategies: Human behavioral ecology at twenty-five. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews: Issues, News, and Reviews, 9(2), 51–72.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Deb, A., Knezevic, A. (2020). Towards Methodological Pluralism in Psychological Sciences. In: Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3868-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3868-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences