Skip to main content

Self-Efficacy, Animal Phobias and Evolutionary Mismatch

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science
  • 951 Accesses

Synonyms

Interpretation about one’s competence and aversions of certain living organisms; Perception of one’s capability and extreme fears of some creatures

Definition

The judgment one has about his/her own competence to cope with certain feared animals is believed to have been an adaptive psychological mechanism that has assisted humans in their attempts to avoid serious harm (and therefore enhancing their survival chances) throughout evolutionary history. Nevertheless, such an evolved psychological mechanism is conceivably less relevant in the modern, largely urbanized and medically progressive environment whereby the risk of being severely injured by the dreaded creatures is relatively more modest.

Introduction

Self-efficacy, the perception of one’s proficiency in accomplishing tasks that are related to the achievement of a specific goal (Bandura 1977), is a concept that has garnered considerable empirical endorsement and has been successfully utilized in elucidating an extensive...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dart, R. C., Seifert, S. A., Boyer, L. V., Clark, R. F., Hall, E., McKinney, P., … & Ward, S. B. (2001). A randomized multicenter trial of crotalinae polyvalent immune Fab (ovine) antivenom for the treatment for crotaline snakebite in the United States. Archives of Internal Medicine, 161, 2030–2036.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davey, G. C., McDonald, A. S., Hirisave, U., Prabhu, G. G., Iwawaki, S., Im Jim, C., … & Reimann, B. C. (1998). A cross-cultural study of animal fears. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36, 735–750.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, K. A., & Page, A. C. (2004). Attention to phobic stimuli during exposure: The effect of distraction on anxiety reduction, self-efficacy and perceived control. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42, 249–275.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. K., & Menzies, R. G. (2000). Danger expectancies, self-efficacy and insight in spider phobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 38, 585–600.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nesse, R. M. (1994). Fear and fitness: An evolutionary analysis of anxiety disorders. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15, 247–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F. (1997). Current directions in self-efficacy research. In M. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 10, pp. 1–49). Greenwich: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, U., Doña, B. G., Sud, S., & Schwarzer, R. (2002). Is general self-efficacy a universal construct? Psychometric findings from 25 countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18, 242–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2014). World urbanization prospects: The 2014 revision, highlights. Retrieved from https://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/publications/files/wup2014-highlights.Pdf.

  • Williams, S. L. (1992). Perceived self-efficacy and phobic disability. In R. Schwarzer (Ed.), Self-efficacy: Thought control of action (pp. 149–176). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiaqing O .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

O, J. (2018). Self-Efficacy, Animal Phobias and Evolutionary Mismatch. In: Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1057-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1057-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics