Skip to main content

Planning for Sustainability: Between Risks and Lifeworlds

  • Chapter
Higher Education in a Sustainable Society

Part of the book series: CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance ((CSEG))

  • 921 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, Planning for sustainability: Between risks and lifeworlds, Mikaela Vasstrøm and Hans Kjetil Lysgård present ideas of a planning study that takes a critical perspective on planning. What are the alternative planning ideas? Planning is a field where different paradigms meet. How can one approach that? Their suggestion is a combination of participatory and critical planning. There is a strong account of planning and sustainability with better links between planning and Higher Education. Empowerment may provide a connection. For both planning and education, we need an understanding of context. The discussion of universities is thought-provoking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Berkes, F., & Folke, C. (1998). Linking social and ecological systems for resilience and sustainbility. In F. Berkes & C. Folke (Eds.), Linking social and ecological systems—Management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Björkell, S. (2008). Resistance to top-down conservation policy and the search for new participatory models. In J. Keulartz & G. Leistra (Eds.), Legitimacy in European nature conservation policy: Case studies in multilevel governance. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, S. (2011). Negotiating a ‘democratic ethos’: Moving beyond the agonistic-communicative divide. Planning Theory, 10(2), 161–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, R. D., & Steelman, T. A. (2005). Beyond scientific management. In R. D. Brunner (Ed.), Adaptive governance: Integrating science, policy, and decision making. New York, NY: Colombia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, L. (2008). Omstridd natur i teori og praktik. In C. Sandström, S. Hovik, & E. I. Falleth (Eds.), Omstridd Natur. Umeå: Borea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, V. P., & Janke, R. R. (2013). Sustainable universities: Rhetoric versus facts. In I. Wallimann (Ed.), Environmental policy is social policy—Social policy is environmental—Towards sustainability policy. New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausen, L. T. (2011). At gripe muligheten for forandring: En analyse af ikke-deltagelse i naturbeskyttelsen med Møn som eksempel (To seize the opportunity of change: Analysis of non-participation in nature protection with Moen as example). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Roskilde University, Institut for miljø, samfund og rumlig forandring.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deetz, S. (1992). Democracy in an age of corporate colonization – developments in communication and the politics of everyday life. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausen, L. T., Hansen, H. P., & Tind, E. (2010). Democracy and sustainability—A lesson learned from modern nature conservation. In M. Figueroa (Ed.), A new agenda for sustainability. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, J., & Kothari, U. (2001). Participation: The new tyranny. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowell, R., & Owens, S. (2011). Land and limits: Interpreting sustainability in the planning process (2nd ed.). Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daugstad, K. (2011). The participatory dimension in nature conservation processes: Examples of ideology and practice from Norway. In M. Jones & M. Steneke (Eds.), The European landscape convention: The challenge of participation. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daugstad, K., Svarstad, H., & Vistad, O. I. (2006). A case of conflicts in conservation: Two trenches or a three-dimensional complexity? Landscape Research, 31(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. C. (2003). The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302(5652), 1907–1912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elling, B. (2008). Rationality and the environment: Decision-making in environmental politics and assessment. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elling, B. (2010). A record on modernity, rationality, and sustainability. In K. A. Nielsen et al. (Eds.), A new agenda for sustainability. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flyvbjerg, B. (1998). Habermas and Foucault: Thinkers for civil society? The British Journal of Sociology, 49(2), 210–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C. (2006a). Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions, 16(3), 253–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C. (2006b). The economic perspective: Conservation against development versus conservation for development. Conservation Biology, 20(3), 686–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, D. J., & Levin, M. (1998). Introduction to action research: Social research for social change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grönholm, S. (2009). Governing national parks in Finland: The illusion of public involvement. Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability, 14(3), 233–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajer, M. A. (2003). A frame in the fields: Policymaking and the reinvention of politics. In M. A. Hajer & H. Wagenaar (Eds.), Deliberative policy analysis understanding governance in the network society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, H. P. (2007). Demokrati og Naturforvaltning - en kritisk sociologisk-historisk analyse af nationalparkudviklingen i Danmark. Ph.D. Dissertation, Roskilde University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M. N. (2010). Utdanningspolitikk og ulikhet. Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning, 51(1), 101–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harste, G. (2000). Risikosamfunnets tidsbindinger. In J. Holten-Andersen et al. (Eds.), Dansk naturpolitik i et bæredygtigt perpektiv. Copenhagen: Naturrådet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey, P. (2006). Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey, P. (2009). The pragmatic tradition in planning thought. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 28(3), 277–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillier, J. (2003). Agon’izing over consensus: Why Habermasian ideals cannot be ‘real’. Planning Theory, 2(1), 37–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hironaka, A. (2003). Science and the environment. In G. S. Drori et al. (Eds.), Science in the modern world polity—Institutionalization and globalization. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2010). Planning with complexity: An introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • In ’t Veld, R. J. (2009). Willingly and Knowingly – The roles of knowledge about nature and the environment in policy processes. In R. J. In ’t Veld (Ed.), RMNO-Series preliminary studies and background studies. Den haag: RMNO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lysgård, H. K., & Cruickshank, J. (2013). Creating attractive places for whom? A discourse theoretical approach to knowledge and planning. Environment and Planning A, 45(12), 2868–2883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meadowcroft, J. (1999). Planning for sustainable development: What can be learned from the critics. In M. Kenny & J. Meadowcroft (Eds.), Planning sustainability. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadowcroft, J. (2007). Who is in charge here? Governance for sustainable development in a complex world. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 9(3–4), 299–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Environment. (2007). Fylkesdelplaner for bruk og vern av prioriterte fjellområder—fastsetting av nasjonale villrein områder (County plans for use and protection of prioritized mountain regions—The establishment of national wildreindeer areas). Oslo: Ministry of Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mossing, A., & Heggenes, J. (2010). Kartlegging av Villreinens Arealbruk i Setesdal Vesthei-Ryfylkeheiene og Setesdal Austhei (The wild reindeer area use in the Ryfylke mountains and Setesdal Western and Eastern Mountain Ranges), Norsk Villreinsenter, NVS 06/2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C. (1999). Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism? Social Research, 66(3), 745–758.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C. (2005). On the political. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, K. A., Elling, B., & Jelsoe, E. (2010). A new agenda for sustainability. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, B. S., & Nielsen, K. A. (2006a). En Menneskelig Natur—Aktionsforskning for bæredygtighed og politisk kultur (A human nature—Action research for sustainability and political culture). København: Frydenlund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, K. A., & Nielsen, B. S. (2006b). Methodologies in action research—Action research and critical theory. In K. A. Nielsen & L. Svensson (Eds.), Action research and interactive research—Beyond practice and theory. Maastricht: Shaker Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, K. A., & Nielsen, B. S. (2007). Demokrati og naturbeskyttelse—Dannelse af borgerfællesskaber gennem social læring—med Møn som ekempel. København: Frydenlund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (2008). The challenge of common-pool resources. Environment, 50(4), 8–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellizzoni, L. (2010). Environmental knowledge and deliberative democracy. In M. Gross & H. Heinrichs (Eds.), Environmental sociology—European perspectives and interdiciplinary challenges. Dordrecht: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pløger, J. (2013). Planlegging, kunnskap og makt. In N. Aarsæther et al. (Eds.), Utfordringer for Norsk planlegging - Kunnskap - Bærekraft - Demokrati (pp. 255–272). Kristiansand, Norway: Cappelen Damm Høyskoleforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2001). Introduction: Inquiry and participation in search of a world worthy of human aspiration. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S., Lambin, E. F., et al. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461(7263), 472–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, W. (1999). Planet dialectics: Explorations in environment and development. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, W. (2010). Environment. In W. Sachs (Ed.), The development dictionary—A guide to knowledge as power (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Zed books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandström, C., Hovik, S., & Falleth, E. I. (2008). Omstridd natur—trender & utmaninger i Nordisk naturforvaltning. Umeå: Borea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiva, V. (2006). Earth democracy: Justice, sustainability and peace. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, L., & Nielsen, K. A. (2006). Action research and interactive research. In K. A. Nielsen & L. Svensson (Eds.), Action research and interactive research beyond practice and theory. Maarstricht: Shaker Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szerszynski, B., Lash, S., & Wynne, B. (1996). Introduction: Ecology, realism, and the social sciences. In S. Lash, B. Szerszynski, & B. Wynne (Eds.), Risk, environment and modernity: Towards a new ecology. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasstrøm, M. (2013). Openings and closures in the environmental planning horizon - An analysis of the participatory potential in a nature protection process in Norway. Ph.D. Dissertation, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasstrøm, M. (2014). Rediscovering nature as commons in environmental planning: New understandings through dialogue. International Journal of the Commons, 8(2), 493–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallimann, I. (2013). Environmental policy is social policy—Social policy is environmental. In I. Wallimann (Ed.), Environmental policy is social policy—Social policy is environmental—Towards sustainbility policy. New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Woodhill, J., & Röling, N. G. (1998). The second wing of the eagle: The human dimension in learning our way to more sustainable futures. In N. G. Röling & M. A. E. Wagemakers (Eds.), Facilitating sustainable agriculture: Participatory learning and adaptive management in times of environmental uncertainty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Report of the world commission on environment and development: Our common future. Chaired by Gro Harlem Brundtland. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427—Development and International Co-operation: Environment. New York, NY: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne, B. (1996). May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide. In S. Lash, B. Szerszynski, & B. Wynne (Eds.), Risk, environment and modernity: Towards a new ecology. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mikaela Vasstrøm .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vasstrøm, M., Lysgård, H.K. (2015). Planning for Sustainability: Between Risks and Lifeworlds. In: Johnsen, H., Torjesen, S., Ennals, R. (eds) Higher Education in a Sustainable Society. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15919-5_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics