Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Consumers’ Behaviour Towards Food Safety: A Literature Review

  • Chapter
Food Safety, Market Organization, Trade and Development

Abstract

This paper deals with the actual expectations of consumers on food safety and their predictable behaviour in case of foodborne outbreaks. We present an overview of the purchase process for risky products and the reason why the consumer has a specific behaviour with respect to the sanitary risk. Moreover, by taking the results of different works that focused these effects in the meat and fruit and vegetables sectors, we show how the real quality signals on the European market (organic production, designation of origin, private retail labels, etc.) could promote consumer confidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/eurostat/home/

  2. 2.

    Brix degrees are roughly equivalent to the percentage of sugar present in the pear.

References

  • Aguiar Fontes M, Lemos JPC, Banovic M, Monteiro ACG, Lúcio C, Duarte F, Fraústo da Silva M, Barreira MM (2008) Is beef differentiation a real source of competitiveness? A combination of procedures to achieve an answer. In: Fanfani R, Ball E, Gutierrez L, Ricci Maccarini E (eds) Competitiveness in agriculture and food industry: US and EU perspectives. Bologna University Press, Bologna

    Google Scholar 

  • Alfnes F, Rickertsen K (2003) European consumers’ willingness to pay for US beef in experimental auction markets. Am J Agric Econ 85(2):396–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson MD, Hollingsworth CS, Zee VV, Coli WM, Rhodes M (1996) Consumer response to integrated pest management and certification. Agric Ecosyst Environ 60(2–3):97–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angulo AM, Gil JM (2007) Risk perception and consumer willingness to pay for certified beef in Spain. Food Qual Prefer 18(8):1106–1117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antle JM (2001) Economic analysis of food safety. In: Gardner B, Rausser G (eds) Handbook of agricultural economics, vol 1. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnade C, Calvin L, Kuchler F (2009) Consumer response to a food safety shock: the 2006 food-borne illness outbreak of E. coli O157:H7 linked to spinach. Rev Agric Econ 31(4):734–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barreira MM, Banovic M, Aguiar Fontes M (2005) As preferências dos consumidores portugueses face às crises. Livro do XV Congresso de Zootecnia, pp 187–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazoche P, Combris P, Giraud-Héraud E, Seabra Pinto A, Bunte F, Tsakiridou E (2014) Willingness to pay for pesticides’ reduction in EU: nothing but organic? Eur Rev Agric Econ 41(1):87–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker G, DeGroot M, Marschak J (1964) Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behav Sci 9(3):226–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard JC, Bernard DJ (2010) Comparing parts with the whole: willingness to pay for pesticide-free, non-GM, and organic potatoes and sweet corn. J Agric Resour Econ 35(3):457–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernués A, Olaizola A, Corcoran K (2003) Labelling information demanded by European consumers and relationships with purchasing motives, quality and safety of meat. Meat Sci 65(3):1095–1106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blend JR, Van Ravenswaay EO (1999) Measuring consumer demand for ecolabeled apples. Am J Agric Econ 81(5):1072–1077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boccaletti S, Nardella M (2000) Consumer willingness to pay for pesticide-free fresh fruit and vegetables in Italy. Int Food Agribus Manag Rev 3(3):297–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunte FHJ, van Galen MA, Kuiper WE, Tacken G (2010) Limits to growth in organic sales. De Economist 158(4):387–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton M, Young T, Cromb R (1999) Meat consumers’ long-term response to perceived risks associated with BSE in Great Britain. Cah Écon Sociol Rural 50:7–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzby JC, Skees JR (1994) Consumers want reduced exposure to pesticides on food. Food Rev 17(2):19–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzby JC, Richard C, Ready RC, Skees JR (1995) Contingent valuation in food policy analysis: a case study of a pesticide- residue risk reduction. J Agric Appl Econ 27 (2):613–625

    Google Scholar 

  • Caswell JA, Joseph S (2006) Consumers’ food safety, environmental and animal welfare concerns: major determinants for agricultural and food trade in the future. Paper presented at the summer symposium of the international agricultural trade research consortium (IATRC): food regulation and trade: institutional framework, concepts of analysis and empirical evidence, Bonn, 28–30 May 2006

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinnici G, D’Amico M, Pecorino B (2002) A multivariate statistical analysis on the consumers of organic products. Br Food J 104(3/4/5):187–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Combris P, Seabra Pinto A, Fragata A, Giraud-Héraud E (2010) Does taste beat food safety? Evidence from the “Pera Rocha” case in Portugal. J Food Prod Mark 16(1):60–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cranfield JAL, Magnusson E (2003) Canadian consumer’s willingness-to-pay for pesticide free food products: an ordered probit analysis. Int Food Agribus Manag Rev 6(4):13–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgran RA, Fairchild DG (1987) The demand impacts of chicken contamination publicity – a case study. Agribusiness 18(4):459–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson DL, Bailey D (2002) Meat traceability: are US consumers willing to pay for it? J Agric Resour Econ 27(2):348–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Enneking U (2004) Willingness-to-pay for safety improvements in the German meat sector: the case of the Q&S label. Eur Rev Agric Econ 31(2):205–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eom Y (1994) Pesticide residue risk and food safety valuation: a random utility approach. Am J Agric Econ 76(4):760–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox J, Hayes D, Shogren J (2002) Consumer preferences for food irradiation: how favourable and unfavourable descriptions affect preferences for irradiated pork in experimental auctions. J Risk Uncertain 24(1):75–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu T-T, Liu J-T, Hammitt JK (1999) Consumer willingness to pay for low-pesticide fresh produce in Taiwan. J Agric Econ 50(2):220–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gil JM, Soler F (2006) Knowledge and willingness to pay for organic food in Spain: evidence from experimental auctions. Food Econ Acta Agric Scand Sect C 3(3–4):109–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Gil JM, Gracia A, Sánchez M (2000) Market segmentation and willingness to pay for organic products in Spain. Int Food Agribus Manag Rev 3(2):207–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govindsamy R, Italia J, Adelaja A (2001) Predicting willingness-to-pay a premium for integrated pest management produce: a logistic approach. Agric Resour Econ Rev 30(2):151–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindsamy R, Italia J (1998) A willingness-to-purchase comparison of integrated pest management and conventional produce. Agribusiness 14(5):403–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govindsamy R, Italia J (1999) Predicting willingness-to-pay a premium for organically grown fresh produce. J Food Distrib Res 30(2):44–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunert KG (2005) Food quality and safety: consumer perception and demand. Eur Rev Agric Econ 32(3):369–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grunert KG, Bredhal L, Brunsø K (2004) Consumer perception of meat quality and implications for product development in the meat sector – a review. Meat Sci 66(2):259–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammitt JK (1993) Consumer willingness-to-pay to avoid pesticide residues. Stat Sin 3(2):351–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Henneberry SR, Mutondo JE (2007) Food labels: implications for U.S. agricultural imports. J Agribus 25(2):197–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Henson S (1996) Consumer willingness to pay for reductions in the risk of food poisoning in the UK. J Agric Econ 47(1–4):403–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henson S, Northen J (2000) Consumer assessment of the safety of beef at the point of purchase: a pan-European study. J Agric Econ 51(1):90–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollingsworth CS, Paschall MJ, Cohen NL, Coli WM (1993) Support in New England for certification and labeling of produce grown using integrated pest management. Am J Altern Agric 8(2):78–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooker NH, Caswell JA (1996) Trends in food quality regulation: implications processed food trade and foreign direct investment. Agribusiness 12(5):411–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang CL (1993) Simultaneous equation model for estimating consumer risk perceptions, attitudes and willingness to pay for residue-free produce. J Consum Aff 27(2):377–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang C (1996) Consumer preferences and attitudes towards organically grown produce. Eur Rev Agric Econ 23(3):331–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolly DA (1991) Differences between buyers and non-buyers of organic produce and willingness to pay organic price premiums. J Agribus 9(1):97–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles T, Moody R, McEachern MG (2007) European food scares and their impact on EU food policy. Br Food J 109(1):43–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krystallis A, Fotopoulos C, Zotos Y (2006) Organic consumers’ profile and their willingness to pay (WTP) for selected organic food products in Greece. J Int Consum Mark 19(1):81–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latouche K, Rainelli P, Vermersch D (1998) Food safety issues and the BSE scare: some lessons from the French case. Food Policy 23(5):347–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loureiro ML, Umberger WJ (2007) A choice experiment model for beef: what US consumer responses tell us about relative preferences for food safety, country-of-origin labeling and traceability. Food Policy 32(4):496–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loureiro ML, McCluskey JJ, Mittelhammer RC (2001) Assessing consumer preferences for organic, eco-labeled, and regular apples. J Agric Resour Econ 26(2):404–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Loureiro ML, McCluskey J, Mittelhammer R (2002) Will consumers pay a premium for eco-labeled apples? J Consum Aff 36(2):203–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luijk R, Schalk S, Muilerman H (2000) Have we lost our minds? Neurotoxin residues harmful to the developing brains of our children. Consumentenbond ans Sticting Natuur en Milieu, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Lusk JL, Schroeder TC (2000) Effects of meat recalls on futures market prices. Paper presented at the NCR-134 conference on applied commodity price analysis, forecasting, and market risk management, Chicago, IL, April 2000

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson E, Cranfield JAL (2005) Consumer demand for pesticide free food products in Canada: a probit analysis. Can J Agric Econ 53(1):67–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangen MJ, Burrell AM (2001) Decomposing preference shifts for meat and fish in The Netherlands. J Agric Econ 52(2):16–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzocchi M (2004) Food scares and demand recovery patterns: an econometric investigation. Paper prepared for presentation at the 84th EAAE seminar on food safety in a dynamic world, Zeist, 8–11 February 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • McCluskey JJ, Grimsrud KM, Ouchi H, Wahl TI (2005) Bovine spongiform encephalopathy in Japan: consumers’ food safety perceptions and willingness to pay for tested beef. Aust J Agric Resour Econ 49(2):197–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie AM, Thomsen MR (2001) The effect of E. Coli 0157:H7 on beef prices. J Agric Resour Econ 26(2):431–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles S, Brennan M, Kuznesof S, Ness M, Ritson C, Frewer LJ (2004) Public worry about specific food safety issues. Br Food J 106(1):9–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misra SM, Huang CL, Ott SL (1991) Consumer willingness to pay for pesticide-free fresh produce. West J Agric Econ 16(2):218–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Monier S, Hassan D, Nichèle V, Simioni M (2009) Organic food consumption patterns. J Agric Food Ind Organ 7, Article 12. Available at: http://bepress.com/jafio/vol7/iss2/art12

  • Mullen JD, Norton GW, Reaves DW (1997) Economic analysis of environmental benefits of integrated pest management. J Agric Appl Econ 29(2):243–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayga R, Aiew W, Nichols J (2005) Information effects on consumers’ willingness to purchase irradiated food products. Rev Agric Econ 27(1):37–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nayga RM, Woodward R, Aiew W (2006) Willingness to pay for reduced risk of foodborne illness: a nonhypothetical field experiment. Can J Agric Econ 54(4):461–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ott SL (1990) Supermarket shoppers’ pesticide concerns and willingness to purchase certified pesticide residue-free fresh produce. Agribusiness 6(6):593–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penner K, Kramer C, Frantz G (1985) Consumer food safety perceptions. MF774. Kansas State Univ. Ext. Service, Manhattan, KS

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennings JME, Wansink B, Meulenberg MTG (2002) A note on modeling consumer reactions to a crisis: the case of the mad cow disease. Int J Res Mark 19(1):91–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peretti-Watel P (2001) La crise de la vache folle: une épidémie fantôme? Sci Social Santé 19(1):5–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piggott NE, Marsh TL (2004) Does food safety information impact U.S. meat demand? Am J Agric Econ 86(1):154–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posri W, Shankar B, Chadbunchachai S (2006) Consumer attitudes towards and willingness to pay for pesticide residue limit compliant “safe” vegetables in Northeast Thailand. J Int Food Agribus Mark 19(1):81–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Project Agro 422 (2004–2007) Project AGRO 422 – Uma política de qualidade para a carne de bovino em Portugal: modos de produção, gostos e preferências dos consumidores. FMV-ULisboa

    Google Scholar 

  • Robenstein RG, Thurman WN (1996) Health risk and the demand for red meat: evidence from futures markets. Rev Agric Econ 18(4):629–641

    Google Scholar 

  • Roosen J, Fox JA, Hennessy DA, Schreiber A (1998) Consumers’ valuation of insecticide use restrictions: an application to apples. J Agric Resour Econ 23(2):367–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Roosen J, Lusk JL, Fox JA (2003) Consumer demand for and attitudes toward alternative beef labeling strategies in France, Germany, and the UK. Agribusiness 19(1):77–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shogren J, Fox J, Hayes D, Roosen J (1999) Observed choices for food safety, in retail, survey, and auction markets. Am J Agric Econ 81(5):1192–1199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smallwood DM, Blaylock JR (1991) Consumer demand for food and food safety: models and applications. In: Caswell JA (ed) Economics of food safety. Elsevier, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Tagbata D, Sirieix L (2008) Measuring consumer’s willingness to pay for organic and fair trade products. Int J Consum Stud 32(5):479–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson GD (1998) Consumer demand for organic foods: what we know and what we need to know. Am J Agric Econ 80(5):1113–1118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonsor GT, Shupp R (2009) Valuations of “sustainably produced” labels on beef, tomato, and apple products. Agric Resour Econ Rev 38(3):371–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsakiridou E, Zotos Y, Mattas K (2006) Employing a dichotomous choice model to assess willingness to pay (WTP) for organically produced products. J Food Prod Mark 12(3):59–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umberger WJ, Feuz DM, Calkins CR, Sitz BM (2003) Country-of-origin labeling of beef products: US consumers’ perceptions. J Food Distrib Res 34(3):103–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbeke W, Ward RW (2001) A fresh meat almost ideal demand system incorporating negative TV press and advertising impact. Agric Econ 25(2–3):359–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viegas I (2013) Consumers’ willingness to pay for safer, cleaner and animal friendlier beef. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Lisbon, Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  • Viegas I, Santos JM, Aguiar Fontes M (2013) Consumers’ perceptions towards beef safety, animal welfare and environment: getting insights and choice scenarios from focus groups. University of Lisbon, Lisbon (Unpublished paper)

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver RD, Evans DJ, Luloff AE (1992) Pesticide use in tomato production: consumer concerns and willingness-to-pay. Agribusiness 8(2):131–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wezemael LV, Verbeke W, Kügler JO, de Barcellos MD, Grunert KG (2010) European consumers and beef safety: perceptions, expectations and uncertainty reduction strategies. Food Control 21(6):835–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yiridoe E, Bonti-Ankomah S, Martin R (2005) Comparison of consumer perceptions and preference toward organic versus conventionally produced foods: a review and update of the literature. Renew Agr Food Syst 20(4):193–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CIISA – Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade de Lisboa (Ulisboa), Lisbon, Portugal

    Magda Aguiar Fontes

  2. INRA-ALISS and Ecole Polytechnique, 91128, Palaiseau CEDEX, France

    Eric Giraud-Héraud

  3. UEIS – SAFSV, National Institute for Agrarian and Veterinarian Research I.P. (INIAV), Oeiras, Portugal

    Alexandra Seabra Pinto

Authors
  1. Magda Aguiar Fontes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eric Giraud-Héraud
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alexandra Seabra Pinto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Magda Aguiar Fontes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Recherche Scientifique, INRA Institut National de la, Ivry sur Seine, France

    Abdelhakim Hammoudi

  2. Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Agro-Alimentari, Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy

    Cristina Grazia

  3. Department of Economics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden

    Yves Surry

  4. Recherche Scientifique, INRA Institut National de la, Ivry sur Seine, France

    Jean-Baptiste Traversac

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fontes, M.A., Giraud-Héraud, E., Pinto, A.S. (2015). Consumers’ Behaviour Towards Food Safety: A Literature Review. In: Hammoudi, A., Grazia, C., Surry, Y., Traversac, JB. (eds) Food Safety, Market Organization, Trade and Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15227-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation