Abstract
A number of studies have profiled the “typical” entrepreneur as being a first born child (e. g., Greenfield 1989; Neider 1987; Themen et al. 1986). To date, however, little research by marketing academicians has been performed on links between birth order and entrepreneurship. While the literatures of psychology and sociology are comparatively rich with research on birth order and its effects, the topic remains substantially under-explored by marketing researchers. This apparent oversight is doubly unfortunate given marketing’s long-standing appreciation of the usefulness of other demographic factors in the study of major areas such as advertising, consumer behavior, promotion and sales.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adler, Alfred (1920), The Practice and Theory of Individual Psychology, Patterson, New Jersey: Littlefield, Adams, 1963.
Altus, William D. (1966), “Birth Order and Its Sequelae,” Science, 151 (January 7), 44–48.
Begley, Thomas M. and David P. Boyd (1987), “A Comparison of Entrepreneurs and Managers of Small Business Firms,” Journal of Management, 13 , 1 (Spring), 99–108.
Bowen, Donald D. and Robert D. Hisrich (1986), “The Female Entrepreneur: A career Development Perspective,” Academy of Management Review, 11 (2): 399.
Bryant, Bonnie Lee (1987), “Birth Order as a Factor in the Development of Vocational Preferences,” Individual Psychology, 43 (1): 40.
Carlson, Les and Norman Kangun (1988), “Demographic Discontinuity: Another Explanation for Consumerism?", The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 22 (1): 55–73.
Cohen, Diane (1985), “Do First and Later Borns Agree with Psychologists?,” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southeastern Psychological Association (31st, Atlanta, GA March 28–30): 54 pages.
Earley, Christopher P., Gregory B. Northcraft, Cynthia Lee and Terri R. Lituchy, “Impact of Process and Outcome Feedback on the Relation of Goal Setting to Task Performance,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 33, No. 1, 87–105.
Galton, Francis (1874), English Men of Science: The Nature and Nurture, London: Macmillan.
Gartner, William B., James W. Carland, Frank Hoy and Jo Ann C. Carland (1988), “Who is an Entreprenuer?” Is the Wrong Question; “Who Is an Entrepreneur?” Is a Question Worth Asking,” American Journal of Small Business, 12, 4 (Spring), 11–39.
George, Jennifer M. (1990), “Personality, Affect, and Behavior in Groups,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 75 (2), 108.
Greenfield, W. M (1989), Developing New Ventures, New York: Harper & Row, p. 24.
Holland, J. L. (1973), Making Vocational Choices: A Theory of Careers, New York: Prentice Hall.
Kurtz, David L., Louis E. Boone, and C Patrick Fleenor (1989), CEO: Who Gets To The Top In America, East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
Lynch, R. M. and J. Lynch (1980), “Birth Order and Vocational Preference,” Journal of Experimental Education, 49 (1), 15–18.
McClelland, David C. (1961), The Achieving Society, Princeton NJ: D. Van Nostrand Co.
Miley, Charles Harvey (1969), “Birth Order Research 1963–1967: Bibliography and Index,” Journal of Individual Psychology, 25, 64–70.
Moore, Kris K., and Joe A. Cox, “Doctor, Lawyer… or Indian Chief? The Effects of Birth Order,” Baylor Business Review, Winter 1990, pp. 18–21.
Neider, Linda (1987), “A Preliminary Investigation of Female Entrepreneurs in Florida” Journal of Small Business Management, 25 (3), (Jul): 22–29.
Steelman, Lala Carr (1985), “A Tale of Two Variables: A Review of the Intellectual Consequences of Sibship Size and Birth Order, Review of Educational Research, 55, 3 (Fall), 353–386.
Therrien, Lois, Teresa Carson, Joan O’C. Hamilton and Jim Hurlock (1986), “What Do Women Want? A Company to Call Their Own,” Business Week, (December 22): 60–62.
Vockell, Edward L, Donald W. Felker and Charles H. Miley (1973), “Birth Order Research 1967–1971: Bibliography and Index,” Journal of Individual Psychology, 29, 39–53.
Zajonc, R. B. and Gregory B. Markus (1975), “Birth Order and Intellectual Development,” Psychological Review, 82 (1), 74–88.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 The Academy of Marketing Science
About this paper
Cite this paper
Claxton, R.P. (2015). Why Marketing Should Consider Birth Order an Important Factor in the Study of Entrepreneurship. In: Levy, M., Grewal, D. (eds) Proceedings of the 1993 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13159-7_115
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13159-7_115
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13158-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13159-7
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)