Skip to main content

Which One to Choose: Random Walks or Spreading Activation?

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8849))

Abstract

Modeling data as a graph of objects is increasingly popular, as we move away from the relational DB model and try to introduce explicit semantics in IR. Conceptually, one of the main challenges in this context is how to “intelligently” traverse the graph and exploit the associations between the data objects. Two highly used methods in retrieving information on structured data are: Markov chain random walks, as is the basic method for page rank, and spreading activation, which originates from the artificial intelligence area. In this paper, we compare these two methods from a mathematical point of view. Random walks have been preferred in information retrieval, while spreading activation has been proposed before, but not really adopted. In this study we find that they are very similar fundamentally under certain conditions. However, spreading activation has much more flexibility and customization options, while random walks holds concise mathematics foundation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berkhin, P.: A survey on pagerank computing. Internet Mathematics 2 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berthold, M.R., Brandes, U., Kötter, T., Mader, M., Nagel, U., Thiel, K.: Pure spreading activation is pointless. In: Proc. of CIKM (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chib, S., Greenberg, E.: Understanding the metropolis-hastings algorithm. The American Statistician 49(4) (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Clements, M., De Vries, A.P., Reinders, M.J.T.: The task-dependent effect of tags and ratings on social media access. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 28(4) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Collins-Thompson, K., Callan, J.: Query expansion using random walk models. In: Proc. of CIKM (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Craswell, N., Szummer, M.: Random walks on the click graph. In: Proc. of SIGIR (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Crestani, F.: Application of spreading activation techniques in information retrieval. Artificial Intelligence Review 11 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Golub, G.H., Van Loan, C.F.: Matrix computations, 3rd edn. Johns Hopkins University Press (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hussein, T., Ziegler, J.: Adapting web sites by spreading activation in ontologies. In: Int. Workshop on Recommendation and Collaboration (in Conjunction with IUI 2008) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Richardson, M., Domingos, P.: The Intelligent Surfer: Probabilistic Combination of Link and Content Information in PageRank. In: Proc. of NIPS (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rocha, C., Schwabe, D., Aragao, M.P.: A hybrid approach for searching in the semantic web. In: Proc. of WWW (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sabetghadam, S., Lupu, M., Rauber, A.: Astera - a generic model for multimodal information retrieval. In: Proc. of Integrating IR Technologies for Professional Search Workshop (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sabetghadam, S., Bierig, R., Rauber, A.: A hybrid approach for multi-faceted IR in multimodal domain. In: Kanoulas, E., Lupu, M., Clough, P., Sanderson, M., Hall, M., Hanbury, A., Toms, E. (eds.) CLEF 2014. LNCS, vol. 8685, pp. 86–97. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Salton, G., Buckley, C.: On the use of spreading activation methods in automatic information. In: Proc. of SIGIR (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Szummer, M., Jaakkola, T.: Partially labeled classification with markov random walks. In: NIPS (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sabetghadam, S., Lupu, M., Rauber, A. (2014). Which One to Choose: Random Walks or Spreading Activation?. In: Lamas, D., Buitelaar, P. (eds) Multidisciplinary Information Retrieval. IRFC 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8849. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12979-2_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12979-2_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-12978-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-12979-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics