Skip to main content

Language and Communication

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Evolutionary Perspectives on Social Psychology

Part of the book series: Evolutionary Psychology ((EVOLPSYCH))

Abstract

Communication, and particularly linguistic communication, is a central component of human social life. There is a great deal of research on the origins and evolution of human communication and language, but less on how an evolutionary perspective can inform research on the social cognition and other proximate mechanisms involved in language and communication. In this chapter, I outline what an evolutionary perspective can tell us about these topics. In particular, I discuss: (1) how human communication is ultimately a matter of mutually assisted mind reading and mental manipulation, (2) what proximate mechanisms can explain why languages are structured in the way they are, (3) evidence that human communicative behavior is adaptive, and (4) both proximate and ultimate explanations of the evolutionary stability of human communication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Berwick, R. C., Pietroski, P., Yankama, B., & Chomsky, N. (2011). Poverty of the stimulus revisited. Cognitive Science, 35, 1207–1242.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carston, R. (2002). Thoughts and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit communication. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chomksy, N. (1980). Rules and representations. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. (2008). Language as shaped by the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 489–558.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, M. H., & Kirby, S. (2003). Language evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Claidière, N., Scott-Phillips, T. C., & Sperber, D. (2014). How Darwinian is cultural evolution? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 369, 20130368.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E. (2012). The evolution of tag-based cooperation in humans: The case for accent. Current Anthropology, 53, 588–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2013). Evolutionary psychology: New perspectives on cognition and motivation. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 201–229. Davies, N. B., Krebs, J. R., & West, S. A. (2012). An introduction to behavioural ecology. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, N., & Levinson, S. C. (2009). The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 429–448.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fitch, W. T. (2010). The evolution of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fitch, W. T., & Reby, D. (2001). The descended larynx is not uniquely human. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, 268, 1669–1675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gambetta, D. (2009). Codes of the underworld: How criminals communicate. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, R. W., & Bryant, G. A. (2008). Striving for optimal relevance when answering questions. Cognition, 106, 345–369.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, A. E. (2006) Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Grose, J. (2011). Modelling and the fall and rise of the handicap principle. Biology & Philosophy, 26(5), 677–696.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurford, J. R. (2007). Origins of meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurford, J. R. (2011). Origins of grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, S., Cornish, H., & Smith, K. (2008). Cumulative cultural evolution in the laboratory: An experimental approach to the origins of structure in human language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 10681–10686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, J. R., & Dawkins, R. (1984). Animal signals: Mind-reading and manipulation. In J. R. Krebs & N. B. Davies (Eds.), Behavioural ecology: An evolutionary approach (2nd ed., pp. 380–402). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachmann, M., Szamado, S., & Bergstrom, C. T. (2001). Cost and conflict in animal signals and human language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98, 13189–13194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyle, H. F., Smith, E. A., & Sullivan, R. J. (2009). Blood donations as costly signals of donor quality. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 7, 263–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J., & Harper, D. G. C. (2003). Animal signals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2011). Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34, 57–111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Milinski, M., Semmann, D., & Krambeck, H. J. (2002). Reputation helps solve the ‘tragedy of the commons’. Nature, 415, 424–426.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Millikan, R. (1984). Language, thought and other biological categories. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson, R. S. (1998) Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomena in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2, 175–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohtsubo, Y., & Watanabe, E. (2009). Do sincere apologies need to be costly? Test of a costly signaling model of apology. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30, 114–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Origgi, G., & Sperber, D. (2000). Evolution, communication and the proper function of language. In P. Carruthers & A. Chamberlain (Eds.), Evolution and the human mind: Language, modularity and social cognition (pp. 140–169). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S., & Bloom, P. (1990). Natural language and natural selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13, 707–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pullum, G. K., & Scholz, B. C. (2002). Empirical assessment of stimulus poverty arguments. Linguistic Review, 18, 9–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott-Phillips, T. C. (2008a). On the correct application of animal signalling theory to human communication. In A. D. M. Smith, K. Smith & R. Ferrer i Cancho (Eds.), The evolution of language: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference (pp. 275–282). Singapore: World Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott-Phillips, T. C. (2008b). Defining biological communication. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 21, 387–395.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scott-Phillips, T. C. (2010). The evolution of relevance. Cognitive Science, 34, 583–601.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scott-Phillips, T. C. (2014). Speaking our minds: Human communication and the evolutionary origins of language. London: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott-Phillips, T. C., Blythe, R. A., Gardner, A., & West, S. A. (2012). How do communication systems emerge? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, 279, 1943–1949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skyrms, B. (2010). Signals: Evolution, learning, and information. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Sperber, D. (1995). How do we communicate? In J. Brockman & K. Matson (Eds.), How things are: A science toolkit for the mind (pp. 191–199). New York: Morrow.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D. (1996). Explaining culture: A naturalistic approach. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (2002). Pragmatics, modularity, and mind-reading. Mind and Language, 17, 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D., Clément, F., Heintz, C., Mascaro, O., Mercier, H., Origgi, G., & Wilson, D. (2010). Epistemic vigilance. Mind and Language, 25, 359–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Számadó, S. (2011). The cost of honesty and the fallacy of the handicap principle. Animal Behaviour, 81, 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Számadó, S. (2012). The rise and fall of handicap principle: A commentary on the ‘Modelling and the fall and rise of the handicap principle’. Biology and Philosophy, 27, 279–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M. (2008). Origins of human communication. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Henst, J.-B., & Sperber, D. (2004). Testing the cognitive and the communicative principles of relevance. In I. Noveck & D. Sperber (Eds.), Experimental pragmatics (pp. 141–171). London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Henst, J.-B., Carles, L., & Sperber, D. (2002). Truthfulness and relevance in telling the time. Mind and Language, 17, 457–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas C. Scott-Phillips Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Scott-Phillips, T. (2015). Language and Communication. In: Zeigler-Hill, V., Welling, L., Shackelford, T. (eds) Evolutionary Perspectives on Social Psychology. Evolutionary Psychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12697-5_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics