Abstract
In this paper we investigate the effect of different embodiments on perception of a skill based feedback (a basic open learner model) with a robotic tutor. We describe a study with fifty-one 11-13 year old learners. Each learner carries out a geography based activity on a touch table. A real time model of the learner’s skill levels is built based on the learner’s interaction with the activity. We explore three conditions where the contents of this learner model is fed back to the learner with different levels of embodiment: (1) Full embodiment, where skill levels are presented and explained solely by a robot; (2) Mixed embodiment, where skill levels are presented on a screen with explanation by a robot; and (3) No embodiment, where skill levels and explanation are presented on a screen with no robot. The findings suggest that embodiment can increase enjoyment, understanding, and trust in explanations of an open learner model.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
http://www.education.gov.uk/schools/teachingandlearning/curriculum/secondary/b00199536/geography (May 29, 2013)
Bainbridge, W.A., Hart, J., Kim, E.S., Scassellati, B.: The effect of presence on human-robot interaction. In: RO-MAN 2008 - The 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 701–706 (August 2008)
Bull, S., Kay, J.: Student Models that Invite the Learner In: The SMILI:() Open Learner Modelling Framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 17(2), 89–120 (2007)
Bull, S., Kay, J.: Open Learner Models. In: Advances in Intelligent Tutoring Systems, ch. 15, pp. 301–322 (2010)
Dehn, D.M., Van Mulken, S.: The impact of animated interface agents: a review of empirical research. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 52(1), 1–22 (2000)
Desmarais, M.C., Baker, R.S.J.D.: A review of recent advances in learner and skill modeling in intelligent learning environments. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 22(1-2), 9–38 (2012)
Hancock, P.A., Billings, D.R., Schaefer, K.E., Chen, J.Y.C., de Visser, E.J., Parasuraman, R.: A Meta-Analysis of Factors Affecting Trust in Human-Robot Interaction. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 53(5), 517–527 (2011)
Hoffmann, L., Krämer, N.C.: How should an artificial entity be embodied? Comparing the effects of a physically present robot and its virtual representation. In: HRI 2011 Workshop on Social Robotic Telepresence, pp. 14–20 (2011)
Johnson, W., Rickel, J.W., Lester, J.C.: Animated pedagogical agents: Face-to-face interaction in interactive learning environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 47–78 (2000)
Kidd, C.: Sociable robots: The role of presence and task in human-robot interaction. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2003)
Kidd, C., Breazeal, C.: Effect of a robot on user perceptions. In: 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37566), vol. 4, pp. 3559–3564 (2004)
Lee, K.M., Jung, Y., Kim, J., Kim, S.R.: Are physically embodied social agents better than disembodied social agents?: The effects of physical embodiment, tactile interaction, and people’s loneliness in human–robot interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 64(10), 962–973 (2006)
Lester, J.C., Kahler, S.E., Barlow, T.S., Stone, B.A., Bhogal, R.S.: The persona effect: affective impact of animated pedagogical agents. In: ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 359–366. ACM (1997)
Leyzberg, D., Spaulding, S., Scassellati, B.: Personalizing robot tutors to individuals’ learning differences. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-robot Interaction - HRI 2014, pp. 423–430. ACM Press, New York (2014)
Leyzberg, D., Spaulding, S., Toneva, M., Scassellati, B.: The Physical Presence of a Robot Tutor Increases Cognitive Learning Gains. In: 34th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2012), vol. 1, pp. 1882–1887 (2012)
Mitrovic, A.: Evaluating the effect of open student models on self-assessment. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 17(2), 121–144 (2007)
Mitrovic, A.: Modeling Domains and Students with Constraint-Based Modeling. In: Advances in Intelligent Tutoring Systems, ch. 4, pp. 63–80 (2010)
Moundridou, M., Virvou, M.: Evaluating the persona effect of an interface agent in a tutoring system. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 18(3), 253–261 (2002)
Pereira, A., Martinho, C., Leite, I., Paiva, A.: iCat, the chess player: the influence of embodiment in the enjoyment of a game. In: Proceedings of 7th International Joint Conference on AAMAS, pp. 1253–1256 (2008)
Szafir, D., Mutlu, B.: Pay attention!: designing adaptive agents that monitor and improve user engagement. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 11–20. ACM Press (2012)
VanLehn, K.: The Relative Effectiveness of Human Tutoring, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, and Other Tutoring Systems. Educational Psychologist 46(4), 197–221 (2011)
Wainer, J., Feil-Seifer, D.J., Shell, D.A., Mataric, M.J.: Embodiment and human-robot interaction: A task-based perspective. In: 16th IEEE International Conference on Robot & Human Interactive Communication, pp. 872–877. IEEE (2007)
Woolf, B.P.: Student Knowledge. In: Building Intelligent Interactive Tutors: Student-centered Strategies for Revolutionizing e-learning, ch. 3 (2008)
Woolf, B.P.: Student modeling. In: Advances in Intelligent Tutoring Systems, ch. 13, pp. 267–279 (2010)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Jones, A., Castellano, G., Bull, S. (2014). Investigating the Effect of a Robotic Tutor on Learner Perception of Skill Based Feedback. In: Beetz, M., Johnston, B., Williams, MA. (eds) Social Robotics. ICSR 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8755. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11973-1_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11973-1_19
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11972-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11973-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)