Skip to main content

Investigating the Effect of a Robotic Tutor on Learner Perception of Skill Based Feedback

  • Conference paper
Social Robotics (ICSR 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8755))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper we investigate the effect of different embodiments on perception of a skill based feedback (a basic open learner model) with a robotic tutor. We describe a study with fifty-one 11-13 year old learners. Each learner carries out a geography based activity on a touch table. A real time model of the learner’s skill levels is built based on the learner’s interaction with the activity. We explore three conditions where the contents of this learner model is fed back to the learner with different levels of embodiment: (1) Full embodiment, where skill levels are presented and explained solely by a robot; (2) Mixed embodiment, where skill levels are presented on a screen with explanation by a robot; and (3) No embodiment, where skill levels and explanation are presented on a screen with no robot. The findings suggest that embodiment can increase enjoyment, understanding, and trust in explanations of an open learner model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. http://www.education.gov.uk/schools/teachingandlearning/curriculum/secondary/b00199536/geography (May 29, 2013)

  2. Bainbridge, W.A., Hart, J., Kim, E.S., Scassellati, B.: The effect of presence on human-robot interaction. In: RO-MAN 2008 - The 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 701–706 (August 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bull, S., Kay, J.: Student Models that Invite the Learner In: The SMILI:() Open Learner Modelling Framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 17(2), 89–120 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bull, S., Kay, J.: Open Learner Models. In: Advances in Intelligent Tutoring Systems, ch. 15, pp. 301–322 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dehn, D.M., Van Mulken, S.: The impact of animated interface agents: a review of empirical research. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 52(1), 1–22 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Desmarais, M.C., Baker, R.S.J.D.: A review of recent advances in learner and skill modeling in intelligent learning environments. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 22(1-2), 9–38 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hancock, P.A., Billings, D.R., Schaefer, K.E., Chen, J.Y.C., de Visser, E.J., Parasuraman, R.: A Meta-Analysis of Factors Affecting Trust in Human-Robot Interaction. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 53(5), 517–527 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hoffmann, L., Krämer, N.C.: How should an artificial entity be embodied? Comparing the effects of a physically present robot and its virtual representation. In: HRI 2011 Workshop on Social Robotic Telepresence, pp. 14–20 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Johnson, W., Rickel, J.W., Lester, J.C.: Animated pedagogical agents: Face-to-face interaction in interactive learning environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 47–78 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kidd, C.: Sociable robots: The role of presence and task in human-robot interaction. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kidd, C., Breazeal, C.: Effect of a robot on user perceptions. In: 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37566), vol. 4, pp. 3559–3564 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lee, K.M., Jung, Y., Kim, J., Kim, S.R.: Are physically embodied social agents better than disembodied social agents?: The effects of physical embodiment, tactile interaction, and people’s loneliness in human–robot interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 64(10), 962–973 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lester, J.C., Kahler, S.E., Barlow, T.S., Stone, B.A., Bhogal, R.S.: The persona effect: affective impact of animated pedagogical agents. In: ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 359–366. ACM (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Leyzberg, D., Spaulding, S., Scassellati, B.: Personalizing robot tutors to individuals’ learning differences. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-robot Interaction - HRI 2014, pp. 423–430. ACM Press, New York (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Leyzberg, D., Spaulding, S., Toneva, M., Scassellati, B.: The Physical Presence of a Robot Tutor Increases Cognitive Learning Gains. In: 34th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2012), vol. 1, pp. 1882–1887 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mitrovic, A.: Evaluating the effect of open student models on self-assessment. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 17(2), 121–144 (2007)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Mitrovic, A.: Modeling Domains and Students with Constraint-Based Modeling. In: Advances in Intelligent Tutoring Systems, ch. 4, pp. 63–80 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Moundridou, M., Virvou, M.: Evaluating the persona effect of an interface agent in a tutoring system. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 18(3), 253–261 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pereira, A., Martinho, C., Leite, I., Paiva, A.: iCat, the chess player: the influence of embodiment in the enjoyment of a game. In: Proceedings of 7th International Joint Conference on AAMAS, pp. 1253–1256 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Szafir, D., Mutlu, B.: Pay attention!: designing adaptive agents that monitor and improve user engagement. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 11–20. ACM Press (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  21. VanLehn, K.: The Relative Effectiveness of Human Tutoring, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, and Other Tutoring Systems. Educational Psychologist 46(4), 197–221 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wainer, J., Feil-Seifer, D.J., Shell, D.A., Mataric, M.J.: Embodiment and human-robot interaction: A task-based perspective. In: 16th IEEE International Conference on Robot & Human Interactive Communication, pp. 872–877. IEEE (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Woolf, B.P.: Student Knowledge. In: Building Intelligent Interactive Tutors: Student-centered Strategies for Revolutionizing e-learning, ch. 3 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Woolf, B.P.: Student modeling. In: Advances in Intelligent Tutoring Systems, ch. 13, pp. 267–279 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jones, A., Castellano, G., Bull, S. (2014). Investigating the Effect of a Robotic Tutor on Learner Perception of Skill Based Feedback. In: Beetz, M., Johnston, B., Williams, MA. (eds) Social Robotics. ICSR 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8755. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11973-1_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11973-1_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11972-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11973-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics