Skip to main content

A Model for Reflection in the Pedagogic Field of Higher Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Teaching Reflective Learning in Higher Education

Abstract

This chapter draws on current literature to theorise a new, transferable and customisable model for teaching and assessing reflective learning across higher education, which foregrounds and explains the pedagogic field of higher education as a multi-dimensional space. Reflection is commonly embedded into assessment requirements in higher education subjects, often without clear expectations or the necessary scaffolding provided to students. Given that professional or academic reflection is not intuitive, and requires specific pedagogic intervention to do well, a program/course-wide approach is essential. We argue that explicit and strategic pedagogic intervention, supported by dynamic resources, is necessary for successful, broad-scale approaches to reflection in higher education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ackoff, R. (1989). From data to wisdom. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 16, 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, L., & Krathwohl, D. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2010). National Teaching Standards.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Nursing and Midwifery Council. (2005). ANMC National Competency standards for the registered nurse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bain, J. D., Ballantyne, R., Mills, C., & Lester, N. C. (2002). Reflecting on practice: Student teachers’ perspectives. Flaxton: Post Pressed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, K., & Mackinlay, E. (2010). Creating rainbows from words and transforming understandings: Enhancing student learning through reflective writing in an aboriginal music course. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(2), 161–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennedsen, J., & Eriksen, O. (2006). Categorizing pedagogical patterns by teaching activities and pedagogical values. Computer Science Education, 16(2), 157–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook 1: The cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Co. Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrington, S., & Selva, G. (2010). Critical social theory and transformative learning: Evidence in pre-service teachers’ service-learning reflection logs. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(1), 45–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). Teacher education and the American future. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 35–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, C. (2009). Language and community: Using service learning to reconfigure the multicultural classroom. Language and Education, 23(3), 217–231. doi: 10.1080/09500780802510159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freebody, P., Maton, C., & Martin, J. R. (2008). Talk, text, and knowledge in cumulative, integrated learning: A response to ‘intellectual challenge’. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 31(2), 188–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. (1988). Teachers as intellectuals. Westport: Bergin & Harvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, R. (2008). Structures for facilitating student reflection. College Teaching, 57(1), 15–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haigh, N. (2000). Teaching teachers about reflection and ways of reflecting. Waikato Journal of Education, 6, 87–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatton, N., & Smith, D. (1995). Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(1), 33–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, F., de Hullu, E., & Tigelaar, D. (2008). Positive experiences as input for reflection by student teachers. Teachers and Teaching, 14(2), 115–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2008). New learning: Elements of a science of education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kincheloe, J. (2003). Teachers as researchers: Qualitative inquiry as a path to empowerment (2nd ed.). London: Routledge-Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonardo, Z. (2004). Critical social theory and transformative knowledge: The functions of criticism in quality education. Educational Researcher, 33(6), 11–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, L., Lay, J., & Peters, J. (2009). Pedagogy of reflective writing in professional education. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 9(1), 93–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow, J. (1990). Fostering critical reflection in adulthood. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow, J. (2006). An overview of transformative learning. In P. Sutherland & J. Crowther (Eds.), Lifelong Learning. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, J. (2004). A handbook of reflective and experiential learning: Theory and practice. London: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, J. (2006). Learning journals: A handbook for reflective practice and professional development. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orland-Barak, L. (2005). Portfolios as evidence of reflective practice: What remains ‘untold’. Educational Research, 47(1), 25–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ovens, A., & Tinning, R. (2009). Reflection as situated practice: A memory-work study of lived experience in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 1125–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panda, S. (2004). Reflection and continuing professional development: Implications for online distance learning. Indian Journal of Open Learning, 13(1), 63–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, M. (2010). Improving reflective writing in higher education: A social semiotic perspective. Teaching in Higher Education, 16(1), 99–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, H., Manns, M. L., & Eckstein, J. (2003). Evolving pedagogical patterns: The work of the pedagogical patterns project. Computer Science Education, 13(4), 315–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, P., & Doherty, C. (2008). Mobile students in liquid modernity: Negotiating the politics of transnational identities. In N. Dolby & F. Rizvi (Eds.), Youth moves: Identities and education in global perspective. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarlier, D. (2005). Mediating the meaning of evidence through epistemological diversity. Nursing Inquiry, 12(2), 126–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mary Ryan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ryan, M., Ryan, M. (2015). A Model for Reflection in the Pedagogic Field of Higher Education. In: Ryan, M. (eds) Teaching Reflective Learning in Higher Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09271-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics