Abstract
Most attempts to use the potentials of information technologies in benefit of the fulfillment of the democratic requirements from the local to the global levels are based on the power of social networks and the utilization of big-data approaches. However, both the network itself and the portliness of data processing have fundamental limitations that need to be overcome when the size of the population is larger than a reduced group. As to cope with the related complexity, the network provides in certain conditions a characteristic structure which facilitates the emergence of new functional features and consequently a system. It is this structure – the fibers of the systemic relations – and new functionalities concerning the circulation of data what change the portliness of data processing into an appropriate percolation and management of relevant information. By these means, complexity and the corresponding information flow are managed at the lowest possible level, while cooperation and higher-level management is ready to cope just with the excess of complexity the lower level cannot manage properly by itself. But this is the very idea of subsidiarity whose application to the organization of heterogeneous societies has been a foundation of decentralized government since the sixteenth century in many different contexts.
At the age of the global information society, the necessary management of global issues (environment, geopolitics, inequality, etc.) requires both proper levelism and information management from the peoples to communities, to national authorities, and to international institutions. Stafford Beer’s Viable System Model provides a suitable approach to deploy subsidiarity with the backbone of an information and communication infrastructure based on the acquisition, circulation, and processing of relevant information to enable decentralized, democratic decision-making.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson, C. H., et al. (2005). Directed visual attention and the dynamic control of information flow. In L. Itti, et al. (Eds.), Neurobiology of attention (pp. 11–17). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
Aristotle. (2004). Politics: a treatise on Government. Trad. In W. Ellis (Eds.), Gutenberg Project. http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/6762 Accessed 20 Aug 2016.
Barabási, A. (2001). The physics of the web. Physics World, 14(7), 33–38.
Barabási, A. (2002). Linked: The new science of networks. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Publishing.
Baran, P. (1964). On distributed communications: I. Introduction to distributed communications networks. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation. http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_memoranda/RM3420.html. Also available in print form. Accessed 15 Aug 2016
Beer, S. (1975). Designing freedom. New York: Wiley.
Beer, S. (1981). Brain of the firm. 2, Wiley, UK.
Browning, N., Krisetya, M., Lairson, L., & Mauldin, A. (2012). Global Internet Map 2012. TeleGeography. http://global-internet-map-2012.telegeography.com/. Accessed 10 Aug 2016.
Campbell, D. F. J., Carayannis, E. G., & Rehman, S. S. (2015). Quadruple helix structures of quality of democracy in innovation systems: The USA, OECD countries, and EU member countries in global comparison. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 6(3), 467–493.
Cavanillas, J. M., Curry, E., & Wahlster, W. (Eds.). (2016). New horizons for a data-driven economy: A roadmap for usage and exploitation of big data in Europe. Basel: Springer.
Corominas-Murtra, B., Valverde, S., & Solé, R. (2009). The ontogeny of scale-free syntax networks: Phase transitions in early language acquisition. Advances in Complex Systems, 12, 371–392.
de Kunder, M. (2016). The size of the World Wide Web (The Internet). WorldWideWebSize.com: http://www.worldwidewebsize.com/. Accessed 15 Aug 2016.
Díaz-Nafría, J. M. (2010). What is information? A multidimensional concern. TripleC, 8(1), 77–108.
Díaz-Nafría, J. M. (2011). The need for an informational systems approach to security. Triple C, 9(1), 93–121.
Díaz-Nafría, J. M. (2014). Ethics at the age of information. Systema: connecting matter, life, culture and technology, 3(2), 43–52.
Díaz-Nafría, J. M. (2017). E-subsidiarity: An ethical approach for living in complexity. In W. Hofkirchner & M. Burgin (Eds.), The future information society: Social and technological problems. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
Díaz-Nafría, J. M., & Zimmermann, R. (2013a). Emergence and evolution of meaning. Triple C, 11(1), 13–35.
Díaz-Nafría, J. M., & Zimmermann, R. (2013b). The emergence and evolution of meaning. The GDI revisiting programme. Part 2: Regressive perspective. Information, 4(2), 240–261.
Díaz-Nafría, J. M., Alfonso, J., & Panizo, L. (2015). Building up eParticipatory decision-making from the local to the global scale. Study case at the European higher education area. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 26–41.
EU (European Union). (2008). Treaty on European Union and the treaty on the functioning of the European Union. Official Journal C, 115, 1–388. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/ALL/?uri=OJ:C:2008:115:TOC. Accessed 10 Aug 2016.
Faloutsos, M., Faloutsos, P., & Faloutsos C. (1999). On power-law relationships of the Internet topology. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 29, 251ss. ACM S/GC0MM 99.
Fleissner, P. (2006). Commodification, information, value and profit. Poiesis & Praxis: International Journal of Technology Assessment and Ethics of Science, 4(1), 39–53. doi:10.1007/s10202-005-0007-y. Accessed 22 Aug 2016.
Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2009). Commonwealth. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Houle, C. (2009). Inequality and democracy: Why inequality harms consolidation but does not affect democratization. World Politics, 61(04), 589–622.
Lambertz, M. (2016). Freiheit und verantwortung für intelligente organisationen. Düsseldorf: Mark Lambertz.
Le Diplomatique, M. (Ed.). (2012). Atlas der Globalisierung – Die Welt von morgen. Berlin: Le Monde Diplomatique-Deutsche Ausgabe.
Mattelart, A. (2003). The information society: An introduction. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Medina, E. (2012). Cybernetic revolutionaries: Technology and politics in Allende's Chile. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Milanovic, B. (2009). Global inequality and the global inequality extraction ratio. The story of the past two Centuries. Policy research working paper 5044. World Bank – Development Research Group.
Milo, R., & Phillips, R. (2015). Cell biology by the numbers. New York: Garland Science.
Newman, M. (2010). Networks: An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Norretranders, T. (1998). The user illusion. New York: Viking.
Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft power. The ways to success in world politics. New York: Public Affairs.
OECD. (2009). Focus on citizens: Public engagement for better policy and services. Paris: OCDE Publishing.
Post, R. (2003). Democracy and equality. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 603, 24–36.
Schwaninger, M. (2015). Organizing for sustainability: A cybernetic concept for sustainable renewal. Kybernetes, 44(67), 935–954.
Sigman, M., & Cecci, G. A. (2002). Global organization of the Wordnet lexicon. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99, 1742–1747.
Solt, F. (2008). Economic inequality and democratic political engagement. American Journal of Political Science, 52(1), 48–60.
UN. (2014). Global governance and global rules for development in the post-2015 era. United Nations. http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/policy/cdp/cdp_publications/2014cdppolicynote.pdf. Accessed 12 Aug 2016.
van Steen, M. (2010). Graph theory and complex networks. Twente: Marteen van Steen.
von Nell-Breuning, O. (1990). Baugesetze der Gesellschaft. Freiburg: Solidarität und Subsidiarität.
Watts, D.J.; Strogatz, S.H. (1998). Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature, 393: 440–442. doi:10.1038/30918. Accessed 15 Aug 2016
World Bank. (2016). World development report 2016: Digital dividends. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-0671-1.
Zimmermann, R. E. (2012). An integral perspective of social action: Imagining, assessing, choosing (onto-epistemology of networks). International Review of Information Ethics, 18, 221–236.
Zimmermann, R., & Díaz, J. M. (2012). The emergence and evolution of meaning. The GDI revisiting programme. Part 1: Progressive perspective. Information, 3(3), 472–503.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Díaz-Nafría, J. (2018). Cyber-Subsidiarity: Toward a Global Sustainable Information Society. In: Carayannis, E., Campbell, D., Efthymiopoulos, M. (eds) Handbook of Cyber-Development, Cyber-Democracy, and Cyber-Defense. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09069-6_39
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09069-6_39
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09068-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09069-6
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences