Skip to main content

Cyber-Subsidiarity: Toward a Global Sustainable Information Society

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover Handbook of Cyber-Development, Cyber-Democracy, and Cyber-Defense

Abstract

Most attempts to use the potentials of information technologies in benefit of the fulfillment of the democratic requirements from the local to the global levels are based on the power of social networks and the utilization of big-data approaches. However, both the network itself and the portliness of data processing have fundamental limitations that need to be overcome when the size of the population is larger than a reduced group. As to cope with the related complexity, the network provides in certain conditions a characteristic structure which facilitates the emergence of new functional features and consequently a system. It is this structure – the fibers of the systemic relations – and new functionalities concerning the circulation of data what change the portliness of data processing into an appropriate percolation and management of relevant information. By these means, complexity and the corresponding information flow are managed at the lowest possible level, while cooperation and higher-level management is ready to cope just with the excess of complexity the lower level cannot manage properly by itself. But this is the very idea of subsidiarity whose application to the organization of heterogeneous societies has been a foundation of decentralized government since the sixteenth century in many different contexts.

At the age of the global information society, the necessary management of global issues (environment, geopolitics, inequality, etc.) requires both proper levelism and information management from the peoples to communities, to national authorities, and to international institutions. Stafford Beer’s Viable System Model provides a suitable approach to deploy subsidiarity with the backbone of an information and communication infrastructure based on the acquisition, circulation, and processing of relevant information to enable decentralized, democratic decision-making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 489.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, C. H., et al. (2005). Directed visual attention and the dynamic control of information flow. In L. Itti, et al. (Eds.), Neurobiology of attention (pp. 11–17). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (2004). Politics: a treatise on Government. Trad. In W. Ellis (Eds.), Gutenberg Project. http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/6762 Accessed 20 Aug 2016.

  • Barabási, A. (2001). The physics of the web. Physics World, 14(7), 33–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barabási, A. (2002). Linked: The new science of networks. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baran, P. (1964). On distributed communications: I. Introduction to distributed communications networks. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation. http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_memoranda/RM3420.html. Also available in print form. Accessed 15 Aug 2016

  • Beer, S. (1975). Designing freedom. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. (1981). Brain of the firm. 2, Wiley, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning, N., Krisetya, M., Lairson, L., & Mauldin, A. (2012). Global Internet Map 2012. TeleGeography. http://global-internet-map-2012.telegeography.com/. Accessed 10 Aug 2016.

  • Campbell, D. F. J., Carayannis, E. G., & Rehman, S. S. (2015). Quadruple helix structures of quality of democracy in innovation systems: The USA, OECD countries, and EU member countries in global comparison. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 6(3), 467–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavanillas, J. M., Curry, E., & Wahlster, W. (Eds.). (2016). New horizons for a data-driven economy: A roadmap for usage and exploitation of big data in Europe. Basel: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corominas-Murtra, B., Valverde, S., & Solé, R. (2009). The ontogeny of scale-free syntax networks: Phase transitions in early language acquisition. Advances in Complex Systems, 12, 371–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Kunder, M. (2016). The size of the World Wide Web (The Internet). WorldWideWebSize.com: http://www.worldwidewebsize.com/. Accessed 15 Aug 2016.

  • Díaz-Nafría, J. M. (2010). What is information? A multidimensional concern. TripleC, 8(1), 77–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Díaz-Nafría, J. M. (2011). The need for an informational systems approach to security. Triple C, 9(1), 93–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Díaz-Nafría, J. M. (2014). Ethics at the age of information. Systema: connecting matter, life, culture and technology, 3(2), 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz-Nafría, J. M. (2017). E-subsidiarity: An ethical approach for living in complexity. In W. Hofkirchner & M. Burgin (Eds.), The future information society: Social and technological problems. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Díaz-Nafría, J. M., & Zimmermann, R. (2013a). Emergence and evolution of meaning. Triple C, 11(1), 13–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Díaz-Nafría, J. M., & Zimmermann, R. (2013b). The emergence and evolution of meaning. The GDI revisiting programme. Part 2: Regressive perspective. Information, 4(2), 240–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Díaz-Nafría, J. M., Alfonso, J., & Panizo, L. (2015). Building up eParticipatory decision-making from the local to the global scale. Study case at the European higher education area. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 26–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EU (European Union). (2008). Treaty on European Union and the treaty on the functioning of the European Union. Official Journal C, 115, 1–388. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/ALL/?uri=OJ:C:2008:115:TOC. Accessed 10 Aug 2016.

  • Faloutsos, M., Faloutsos, P., & Faloutsos C. (1999). On power-law relationships of the Internet topology. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 29, 251ss. ACM S/GC0MM 99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleissner, P. (2006). Commodification, information, value and profit. Poiesis & Praxis: International Journal of Technology Assessment and Ethics of Science, 4(1), 39–53. doi:10.1007/s10202-005-0007-y. Accessed 22 Aug 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2009). Commonwealth. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houle, C. (2009). Inequality and democracy: Why inequality harms consolidation but does not affect democratization. World Politics, 61(04), 589–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambertz, M. (2016). Freiheit und verantwortung für intelligente organisationen. Düsseldorf: Mark Lambertz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Diplomatique, M. (Ed.). (2012). Atlas der Globalisierung – Die Welt von morgen. Berlin: Le Monde Diplomatique-Deutsche Ausgabe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattelart, A. (2003). The information society: An introduction. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medina, E. (2012). Cybernetic revolutionaries: Technology and politics in Allende's Chile. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milanovic, B. (2009). Global inequality and the global inequality extraction ratio. The story of the past two Centuries. Policy research working paper 5044. World Bank – Development Research Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milo, R., & Phillips, R. (2015). Cell biology by the numbers. New York: Garland Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. (2010). Networks: An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Norretranders, T. (1998). The user illusion. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft power. The ways to success in world politics. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2009). Focus on citizens: Public engagement for better policy and services. Paris: OCDE Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Post, R. (2003). Democracy and equality. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 603, 24–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwaninger, M. (2015). Organizing for sustainability: A cybernetic concept for sustainable renewal. Kybernetes, 44(67), 935–954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigman, M., & Cecci, G. A. (2002). Global organization of the Wordnet lexicon. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99, 1742–1747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solt, F. (2008). Economic inequality and democratic political engagement. American Journal of Political Science, 52(1), 48–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN. (2014). Global governance and global rules for development in the post-2015 era. United Nations. http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/policy/cdp/cdp_publications/2014cdppolicynote.pdf. Accessed 12 Aug 2016.

  • van Steen, M. (2010). Graph theory and complex networks. Twente: Marteen van Steen.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Nell-Breuning, O. (1990). Baugesetze der Gesellschaft. Freiburg: Solidarität und Subsidiarität.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, D.J.; Strogatz, S.H. (1998). Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature, 393: 440–442. doi:10.1038/30918. Accessed 15 Aug 2016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2016). World development report 2016: Digital dividends. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-0671-1.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, R. E. (2012). An integral perspective of social action: Imagining, assessing, choosing (onto-epistemology of networks). International Review of Information Ethics, 18, 221–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, R., & Díaz, J. M. (2012). The emergence and evolution of meaning. The GDI revisiting programme. Part 1: Progressive perspective. Information, 3(3), 472–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José María Díaz-Nafría .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Díaz-Nafría, J. (2018). Cyber-Subsidiarity: Toward a Global Sustainable Information Society. In: Carayannis, E., Campbell, D., Efthymiopoulos, M. (eds) Handbook of Cyber-Development, Cyber-Democracy, and Cyber-Defense. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09069-6_39

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics