Skip to main content

Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Antegrade Ureteroscopy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ureteral Stone Management

Abstract

Retrograde ureteroscopy has become a mainstay in the treatment of ureteral and renal calculi. Over the past decade there has been a dramatic increase in the number of retrograde ureteroscopic procedures performed for stone disease due to both high postoperative stone-free rates and low incidence of complications. Thus, it is not surprising that ureteroscopy is gaining acceptance as the primary treatment modality for upper tract stone disease. However, there are certain circumstances when retrograde ureteroscopy is not successful or feasible, such as altered anatomy or very large stone size. In such circumstances, alternate treatment options must be considered. Antegrade ureteroscopy (URS) performed through a percutaneous approach is often a useful treatment option for proximal and mid-ureteral calculi when retrograde URS is not possible. The following chapter will discuss a brief history of percutaneous ureteral stone surgery, modern uses of antegrade URS, indications for antegrade URS, a description of current technique, and a discussion of postoperative management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Turney W, Reynard JM, Noble JG, et al. Trends in urological stone disease. BJU Int. 2012;109(7):1082–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. de la Rosette J, Denstedt J, Geavlete P, et al. The clinical research office of the endourological society ureteroscopy global study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 11,885 patients. J Endourol. 2014;28(2):131–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Perez Castro E, Osther PJ, Jinga V, et al. Differences in ureteroscopic stone treatment and outcomes for distal, mid-, proximal, or multiple ureteral locations: The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Ureteroscopy Global Study. Eur Urol. 2014;66(1):102–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fernstrom I, Johansson B. Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1976;10(3):257–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rusnak B, Castaneda-Zuniga W, Kotula F, et al. An improved dilator system for percutaneous nephrostomies. Radiology. 1982;144(1):174.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Clayman RV, Castaneda-Zuniga WR, Hunter DW, et al. Rapid balloon dilatation of the nephrostomy track for nephrostolithotomy. Radiology. 1983;147(3):884–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Segura JW, Patterson DE, LeRoy AJ, et al. Percutaneous lithotripsy. J Urol. 1983;130(6):1051–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. de la Rosette J, Assimos D, Desai M, et al. The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 5803 patients. J Endourol. 2011;25(1):11–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Clayman RV, Preminger GM, Franklin JF, et al. Percutaneous ureterolithotomy. J Urol. 1985;133(4):671–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gumpinger R, Miller K, Fuchs G, et al. Antegrade ureteroscopy for stone removal. Eur Urol. 1985;11(3):199–202.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bagley DH, Rittenberg MH. Percutaneous antegrade flexible ureteroscopy. Urology. 1986;27(4):331–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim BS, Lee JN, Choi JY, et al. Antegrade flexible ureteroscopy for bilateral ureteral stones in a patient with severe hip joint ankylosis. Korean J Urol. 2010;51(11):800–2.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sun X, Xia S, Lu J, et al. Treatment of large impacted proximal ureteral stones: randomized comparison of percutaneous antegrade ureterolithotripsy versus retrograde ureterolithotripsy. J Endourol. 2008;22(5):913–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Maheshwar PN, Oswal AT, Andankar M, et al. Is antegrade ureteroscopy better than retrograde ureteroscopy for impacted large upper ureteral calculi? J Endourol. 1999;13(6):441–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Goel R, Aron M, Kesarwani PK, et al. Percutaneous antegrade removal of impacted upper-ureteral calculi: still the treatment of choice in developing countries. J Endourol. 2005;19(1):54–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shimk MS, Tollefson MK, Umbreit EC, et al. Long-term complications of conduit urinary diversion. J Urol. 2011;185(2):562–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Stuurman RE, Al-Qahtani SM, Cornu JN, et al. Antegrade percutaneous flexible endoscopic approach for the management of urinary diversion-associated complications. J Endourol. 2013;27(11):1330–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Miller NL, Matlaga BR, Lingeman JE. Techniques for fluoroscopic percutaneous renal access. J Urol. 2007;178(1):15–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Winter M, Lynch C, Appu S, et al. Surgery illustrated–focus on details: access sheath-aided percutaneous antegrade ureteroscopy; a novel approach to the ureter. BJU Int. 2011;108(4):620–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Basiri A, Simforoosh N, Ziaee A, et al. Retrograde, antegrade, and laparoscopic approaches for the management of large, proximal ureteral stones: a randomized clinical trial. J Endourol. 2008;22(12):2677–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amy E. Krambeck MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rivera, M.E., Krambeck, A.E. (2015). Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Antegrade Ureteroscopy. In: Patel, S., Nakada, S. (eds) Ureteral Stone Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08792-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08792-4_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08791-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08792-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics