Skip to main content

Program Evaluation and Modification: Supporting Pragmatic Data-Driven Clinical Videoconferencing (CV) Services

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Clinical Videoconferencing in Telehealth

Abstract

This chapter discusses the prioritization of desired outcomes and ongoing program evaluation in the provision of clinical videoconferencing (CV) services. It provides an overall organizing framework to consider program evaluation from the very early stages of planning. Emphasis is placed on crafting evaluation fitted to specific needs and available resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hilty DM, Ferrer D, Callahan EJ, et al. The effectiveness of telemental health: a 2013 review. Telemed J E-Health. 2013;19(6):444–54.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hilty DM, Yellowlees, PM, Cobb HC, et al. Models of telepsychiatric consultation-liaison service to rural primary care. Psychosomatics. 2006;47(2):152–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fortney JC, Pyne JM, Edlund MJ, et al. A randomized trial of telemedicine-based collabora- tive care for depression. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22(8):1086–93.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fortney JC, Pyne JM, Mouden SP, et al. Practice-based versus telemedicine-based collaborative care for depression in rural federally qualified health centers: a pragmatic randomized comparative effectiveness trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2013;1–12. http://ajp/psychiatryonline.org.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hilty DM, Marks SL, Urness D, et al. Clinical and educational applications of telepsychiatry: a review. Can J Psychiatry. 2004;49(1):12–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. AACAP Practice Parameter for Telepsychiatry with Children and Adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2007;47(12):1468–83.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pesamaa L, Ebeling H, Kuusimaki ML, et al. Videoconferencing in child and adolescent telepsychiatry: a systematic review of the literature. J Telemed Telecare. 2004;10:187–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yellowlees PM, Hilty DM, Marks SL, et al. A retrospective analysis of child and adolescent e-mental health. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008;47(1):1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rabinowitz T, Murphy K, Amour JL, et al. Benefits of a telepsychiatry consultation service for rural nursing home residents. Telemed J E-Health. 2010;16:34–40.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jones BN, Ruskin PE. Telemedicine and geriatric psychiatry: Directions for future research and policy. J Geriatr Psychiatr Neurol 2001;14(2)59–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Weinstein MC, Stason WB. Foundations of cost-effectiveness analysis for health and medical practices. N Engl J Med. 1977;296(13):716–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yellowlees PM, Shore J, Roberts L. Practice guidelines for videoconferencing-based telemental health, American telemedicine association. Telemed J E-Health. 2010;16:1074–89. http://www.americantelemed.org/resources/standards/ata-standards-guidelines/practiceguidelines-for-video-based-online-mental-health-services#.U2bGexYrfdk.

  13. Shore J, Mishkind MC, Bern Bernard J, et al. A lexicon of assessment and outcome measures for telemental health. ATA. 2013. http://www.americantelemed.org/practice/standards/ata-standardsguidelines/a-lexicon-of-assessment-and-outcome-measurements-for-telemental-health#UwF5Dv0_3-Y. Accessed 1 Feb 2014. http://www.americantelemed.org/resources/standards/ata-standards-guidelines/a-lexicon-of-assessment-and-outcome-measurementsfor-telemental-health#.U2bG2xYrfdk.

  14. Yellowlees PM, Odor A, Burke MM, et al. A feasibility study of asynchronous telepsychiatry for psychiatric consultations. Psychiatr Serv. 2010;61(8):838–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Geyer J, Myers K, Vander Stoep A, et al. Implementing a low-cost web-based clinical trial management system for community studies: a case study. Clin Trials. 2011;8:634–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Unutzer J, Choi Y, Cook IA, et al. A web-based data management system to improve care for depression in a multicenter clinical trial. Psychiatr Serv. 2002;53:671–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Myers KM, Valentine JM, Melzer SM. Feasibility, acceptability, and sustainability of telepsychiatry for children and adolescents. Psychiatr Serv. 2007;58:1493–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yip MP, Chang AM, Chan J, et al. Development of the telemedicine satisfaction questionnaire to evaluate patient satisfaction with telemedicine: a preliminary study. J Telemed Telecare. 2003;9:46–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yellowlees PM, Odor A, Patrice K, et al. Transcultural psychiatry made simple: asynchronous telepsychiatry as an approach to providing culturally relevant care. Telemed E-Health. 2013;19(4):1–6.17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nieves J, Stack KM. Hispanics and telepsychiatry. Psychiatr Serv. 2007;58:877–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chong J, Moreno FA. Feasibility and acceptability of clinic-based telepsychiatry for low- income Hispanic primary care patients. Tele-Health. 2012;18(4):297–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mucic D. Transcultural telepsychiatry and its impact on patient satisfaction. J Telemed Telecare. 2010;16(5):237–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Moreno FA, Chong J, Dumbauld J, et al. Use of standard webcam and Internet equipment for telepsychiatry treatment of depression among underserved Hispanics. Psychiatr Serv. 2012;63(12):1213–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lopez AM, Cruz M, Lazarus S, et al. Use of American sign language in telepsychiatry consultation. Telemed E-Health. 2004;10(3):389–91.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shore JH, Brooks E, Savin D, Orton H, Grigsby J, Manson S. Acceptability of telepsychiatry in American Indians. Telemed E-Health. 2008;14(5):461–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ye J, Shim R, Lukaszewski T, Yun K, et al. Telepsychiatry services for Korean immigrants. Telemed E-Health. 2012;18(10):797–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hilty DM, Marks SL, Wegeland JE, et al. A randomized controlled trial of disease management modules, including telepsychiatric care, for depression in rural primary care. Psychiatry. 2007;4(2):58–65.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Richardson L, McCauley E, Katon W. Collaborative care for adolescent depression: a pilot study. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2009;31:36–45.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Frueh BC, Monnier J, Yim E, et al. Randomized trial for post-traumatic stress disorder. J Telemed Telecare. 2007;13:142–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Tuerk PW, Wangelin B, Rauch SAM, Dismuke CE, Yoder M, Myrick DH, Eftekhari A, Acierno R. Health service utilization before and after evidence-based treatment for PTSD. Psychological Services. Advance online publication. http://www.ptsd.va.gov/professional/articles/article-pdf/id39607.pdf. doi:10.1037/a0030549. Accessed 12 Nov 2012.

  31. Tuerk PW, Yoder M, Ruggiero KJ, Gros DF, Acierno R. A pilot study of prolonged exposure therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder delivered via telehealth technology. J Trauma Stress. 2010;23(1):116–23. doi:10.1002/jts.20494.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Szeftel R, Federico C, Hakak R, et al. Improved access to mental health evaluation for patients with developmental disabilities using telepsychiatry. J Telemed Telecare. 2012;18(6):317–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Pakyurek M, Yellowlees PM, Hilty DM. The child and adolescent telepsychiatry consultation: can it be a more effective clinical process for certain patients than conventional practice? Telemed J E-Health. 2010;16(3):289–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hall RC. Global assessment of functioning. A modified scale. Psychosomatics. 1995;36(3):267–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Myers KM, Vander Stoep A, McCarty CA, et al. Child and adolescent telepsychiatry: variations in utilization, referral patterns and practice trends. J Telemed Telecare N Am. 2011;20(1):155–71.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Myers KM, Palmer NB, Geyer JR. Research in child and adolescent telemental health. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2011;20(1):155–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Saunders JB, Aasland OG, Babor TF, et al. Development of the alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on identification and treatment of persons with harmful alcohol consumption, phase II. Addiction. 1993;88:791–804.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ewing JA. Detecting alcoholism: the CAGE questionnaire. J Am Med Assoc. 1984;252:1905–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Steer RA, Rissmiller DJ, Beck AT. Use of the Beck depression inventory with depressed geriatric patients. Behav Res Ther. 2000;38(3):311–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Steer RA, Ball R, Ranieri RF, et al. Dimensions of the Beck depression inventory-II in clinically depressed outpatients. J Clin Psychol. 1999;55(1):17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Goodman WK, Price LH, Rasmussen SA, et al. The Yale–Brown obsessive–compulsive scale. I. Development, use, and reliability. Arch Gen Psychiatry.1989;46:1006–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ware JE, Kosinski M. SF-36 physical & mental health summary scales: a manual for users of version 1. Lincoln: Quality Metric; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Stewart AL, Ware JE, editors. Measuring functioning and well-being: the medical outcome study approach. Durham: Duke University Press; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Blanchard EB, Jones-Alexander J, Buckley TC, et al. Psychometric properties of the PTSD checklist (PCL). Behav Res Ther. 1996;34(8):669–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. MacKinnon DP, Krull JL, Lockwood CM. Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect. Prev Sci. 2000;1(4):173–81.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Katon W, Von Korff M, Lin E, et al. Collaborative management to achieve depression treatment guidelines. J Clin Psychiatry. 1997;58(Suppl 1):20–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Hilty DM, Ingraham RL, Yang RP, et al. Multispecialty phone and email consultation to primary care providers for patients with developmental disabilities in rural California. J Telemed E-Health. 2004;10:413–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Hilty DM, Yellowlees PM, Nesbitt TS. Evolution of telepsychiatry to rural sites: change over time in types of referral and PCP knowledge, skill, and satisfaction. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2006;28(5):367–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Butler T, Yellowlees P. Cost analysis of store-and-forward telepsychiatry as a consultation model for primary care. Telemed J E Health. 2012;18(1):74–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Shore JH, Hilty DM, Yellowlees PM. Emergency management guidelines for telepsychiatry. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2007;29:199–206.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Yellowlees PM, Burke MM, Marks SL, et al. Emergency telepsychiatry. J Telemed Telecare. 2008;14:277–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Sorvaniemi M, Ojanen E, Santamäki O. Telepsychiatry in emergency consultations: a followup study of sixty patients. Telemed J E-Health. 2005;11(4):439–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Neufeld JD, Bourgeois JA, Hilty DM, et al. The e-Mental Health Consult Service: providing enhanced primary care mental health services through telemedicine. Psychosomatics. 2007;48:135–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donald M. Hilty M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Conclusion

This chapter addressed the prioritization of desired outcomes and evaluation in the provision of CV services. Process, procedures, levels of depth and dos and don’ts were offered to give the reader options to learn basic or advanced approaches to CV, program change, and evaluation/outcomes. Clearly, the best standard for program evaluation is a simple yet elegant plan, and one that is practical, efficient, systematic, and grounded in the evidence base. This chapter attempted to convey that varying levels of evaluation quality, scope and depth may be employed depending on the situation, but that any evaluation should be grounded in and facilitates program improvement. Why ask the question if you do nothing with the answer? Accordingly, an efficient plan could be centered on just a few variables sufficient to get to the next better place incrementally. The important thing is that those few variables be chosen with thought, with broad agreement among players, and be measurable with the means available.

Acknowledgements

American Telemedicine Association , and in particular, the Telemental Health Interest Group, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences of the Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern California, the UC Davis School of Medicine Center for Health and Technology of the UC Davis Health System.

Appendix 6.A

Examples of telehealth care that have been thoroughly evaluated and well-articulated

  1. 1.

    Randomized controlled trial (RCT) for depression in adults [27].

  2. 2.

    Phone and email physician-to-provider consultation system using a 24 h “warm” line [47].

  3. 3.

    Telepsychiatric consultation (phone, email, or video), with continuing medical education (CME) [48].

  4. 4.

    Cultural consultation to rural primary via telemedicine [2].

  5. 5.

    Collaborative care via telepsychiatry, coprovision of medication for primary care patients by the telepsychiatrist and primary care provider in rural communities for adults [3, 4] and children [28].

  6. 6.

    Asynchronous telepsychiatry (ATP) [14], formerly known as store-and-forward services, used at the patient end (video recording local providers and patients, and uploading of videos for remote review and consultation. It is very cost-efficient) [14, 49].

  7. 7.

    Telepsychiatric emergency room evaluation [50, 52].

  8. 8.

    Integrated behavioral health by telepsychiatry [53].

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hilty, D. et al. (2015). Program Evaluation and Modification: Supporting Pragmatic Data-Driven Clinical Videoconferencing (CV) Services. In: Tuerk, P., Shore, P. (eds) Clinical Videoconferencing in Telehealth. Behavioral Telehealth. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08765-8_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics