Skip to main content

Combining Geographical and Social Dynamics in Dynamic 3D Environments

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Thematic Cartography for the Society

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography ((LNGC))

  • 1526 Accesses

Abstract

Mapping our real world is a challenging task, mainly because it involves numerous dynamics within the contexts of physical and social environments. A dynamic map environment was developed in this chapter, to help us understand and manage our complex world in a more sustainable and resilient way. A conceptual architecture to integrate real environmental information and dynamic social activities was presented as three elements: (1) based on a collaborative virtual geographic environment with volunteered knowledge construction; (2) linking the dynamic environmental factors that are relevant to our everyday life; and (3) expanding the comprehensive social experience/activities of daily interactions and communications without the limitation of spatial and temporal constraints. Using the virtual campus map of the Chinese University of Hong Kong, we verify this hypothesis and present our initial design of an interactive dynamic environment. The results show that the dynamic map environment can give people visual and tangible access to real-time information about environmental dynamics, and help them to join in and interact with actual happenings, from their daily activities to purposeful cognition of the world. The research provides an insight into the development of a dynamic map environment, and plays an important role in developing an open research platform for virtual geography and campus-based social cognition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • ArcGIS (2013) Mapping & Analysis for Understanding Our World. http://www.esri.com/software/arcgis/index.html. Retrieved 16 October 2013.

  • Bainbridge W (2007) The scientific research potential of virtual worlds. Science. 317, 472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blascovich J, Loomis J, Beall AC, Swinth KR, Hoyt CL (2002) Immersive virtual environment technology as a methodological tool for social psychology. Psychological Inquiry. 13, 103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandão SP, Coelho A (2011) Procedural modeling for realistic virtual worlds development. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research. 4, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler D (2006) The web-wide world. Nature. 439, 776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook T, Hopkins L (2007) Social media: An introduction to the power of “web2.0”. http://trevorcook.typepad.com/weblog/files/cookhopkins-socialmediawhitepaper-2007.pdf. Retrieved 01 September 2013.

  • Corten R (2012) Composition and structure of a large online social network in the Netherlands. PLoS ONE. 7, e34760. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0034760.

  • Couclelis H (2009) Rethinking time geography in the information age. Environment and Planning A. 41, 1556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crampton J (2009) Cartography: Maps 2.0. Progress in Human Geography. 33, 91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djorgovski SG, Hut P, McMillan S, Vesperini E, Knop R (2009) Exploring the use of virtual worlds as a scientific research platform: The meta-institute for computational astrophysics (MICA). Proceedings of Facets of Virtual Environments, ICST Lecture Notes Ser. Berlin/Verlag: Springer. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodge M, Perkins C (2009) The ‘view from nowhere’? Spatial politics and cultural significance of high resolution satellite imagery. Geoforum. 40, 497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elwood S (2011) Geographic information science: Visualization, visual methods, and the geoweb. Progress in Human Geography. 35, 401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein JM, Pankajakshan R, Hammond RA (2011) Combining computational fluid dynamics and agent-based modeling: A new approach to evacuation planning. PLoS ONE. 6, e20139. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020139.

  • Farman J (2010) Mapping the digital empire: Google earth and the process of postmodern cartography. New Media & Society. 12, 869.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedmannová L, Stanek K (2010) Cartographically augmented reality. Proceedings of the 3rd ISDE digital earth summit – digital earth in the service of society: sharing information, building knowledge. Nessebar, Bulgaria: ISDE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert RL (2011) The prose (psychological research on synthetic environments) project: Conducting in-world psychological research on 3d virtual worlds. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research. 4, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild MF (2010) Twenty years of progress: GIScience in 2010. Journal of Spatial Information Science. 1, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild MF (2012) The future of Digital Earth. Annals of GIS. 18, 93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haklay M, Singleton A, Parker C.: 2008, Web mapping 2.0: The neogeography of the geoweb. Geography Compass. 2, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall GB, Chipeniuk R, Feick RD, Leahy MG, Deparday V (2010) Community-based production of geographic information using open source software and web 2.0. International Journal of Geographical Information Science. 24, 761.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirtle S, Maceachren A (1998) Cognitive models of dynamic geographic phenomena and their representations. URL: http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/Publications/Varenius_Reports/Cognitive_Models.pdf.

  • Hu MY, Lin H, Chen B, Chen M, Che WT (2011) A virtual learning environment of the Chinese University of Hong Kong. International Journal of Digital Earth. 4, 171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang B, Jiang B, Lin H (2001) An integration of GIS, virtual reality and the Internet for spatial data exploration. International Journal of Geographical Information Science. 15, 439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson A, Thompson EM, Coventry KR (2010) Human perception, virtual reality and the built environment. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference Information Visualisation (IV). The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), California, USA, 604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler T, Matzler K, Fuller J (2009) Avatar-based innovation: Using virtual worlds for real-world innovation. Technovation. 29, 395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konecny M (2011) Review: Cartography: challenges and potential in the virtual geographic environments era. Annals of GIS. 17, 135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraak MJ (2004) The role of the map in a Web-GIS environment. Journal of Geographical Systems. 6, 83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreijns K, Kirschner PA, Jochems W, Van Buuren H (2007) Measuring perceived sociability of computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Computers & Education. 49, 176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lifton J, Paradiso JA (2012) Dual reality: Merging the real and virtual. http://dspace.mit.edu/openaccess-disseminate/1721.1/61991.

  • Lin H, Zhu Q (2005) Virtual geographic environments. In Zlatanova S, Prosperi D, (eds.) Large-scale 3d data integration: Challenges and opportunities. New York: Taylor & Francis. 211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin H, Chen M, Lu G, Zhu Q, Gong J, You X, Wen Y, Xu B, Hu M (2013a) Virtual Geographic Environments (VGEs): A new generation of geographic analysis tools. Earth-Science Reviews. 126, 74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin H, Chen M, Lv GN (2013b) Virtual geographic environment - a workspace for computer-aided geographic experiments. Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 3, 465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mania K, Badariah S, Coxon M, Watten P (2010) Cognitive transfer of spatial awareness states from immersive virtual environments to reality. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception. 9, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchant JC (2010) Are you ready for life in world 3?. http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/culturelab/2010/08/are-you-ready-for-life-in-world-3.html. Retrieved 10 November 2012.

  • Meng L (2010) Changing world and its changing mapping strategies. http://www.szdcec.com/icgit2010/pdf/1018_1.pdf. Retrieved 05 October 2013.

  • Messinger PR, Stroulia E, Lyons K, Bone M, Niu RH (2009) Virtual worlds – past, present, and future: New directions in social computing. Decision Support Systems. 47, 204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller HJ (2003) What about people in geographic information science? Computers, Environment and Urban Systems. 27, 447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montello DR, Waller D, Hegarty M, Richardson AE (2004) Spatial memory of real environments, virtual environments, and maps. In Allen GL, editors. Human Spatial Memory: Remembering Where. Mahwah: NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 251.

    Google Scholar 

  • NRC (2007) Linked social-spatial data: Promises and challenges. In Gutmann MP, Stern P, (eds.). Putting people on the map: Protecting confidentiality with linked social-spatial data. Washington: National Academy Press. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Outram C, Ratti C, Biderman A (2010) The Copenhagen Wheel: An innovative electric bicycle system that harnesses the power of real-time information an crowd sourcing. http://cgt.columbia.edu/files/papers/Outram_Ratti_Biderman_EVER2010_Monaco.pdf. Retrieved 07 September 2013.

  • Pelachaud C, Martin JC, André E, Chollet G, Karpouzis K (2007) Spatial social behaviour in second life. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. 252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragan E, Bowman D, Huber K (2012) Supporting cognitive processing with spatial information presentations in virtual environments. Virtual Reality. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravitz G, Shyu ML, Powell MD (2010) Integrating multimedia semantic content analysis of YouTube videos with hurricane wind analysis for public situation awareness and outreach. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering. 20, 155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resch B, Lipson S, Bers J, Ratti C, Mittleboeck M (2013) Integrated Urban Sensing: 2013, A Geosensor Network for Public Health Monitoring and Beyond. http://dspace.mit.edu/openaccessdisseminate/1721.1/64636. Retrieved 05 October 2013.

  • Scharl A (2007) Towards the geospatial web: Media platforms for managing geotagged knowledge

    Google Scholar 

  • repositories. In Scharl A, Tochtermann K, editors. The geospatial web - how geo-browsers, social software and the web 2.0 are shaping the network society. London: Springer. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw SL, Yu H (2009) A GIS-based time-geographic approach of studying individual activities and interactions in a hybrid physical–virtual space. Journal of Transport Geography. 17, 141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard R, Cizek P (2009) The ethics of Google Earth: Crossing thresholds from spatial data to landscape visualization. Journal of Environmental Management. 90, 2102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sui D, Goodchild M. (2011) The convergence of GIS and social media: challenges for GIScience. International Journal of Geographical Information Science. 25, 1737.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuzun H, Yilmaz SM, Karakus T, Inal Y, Kizilkaya G (2009) The effects of computer games on primary school students’ achievement and motivation in geography learning. Computers & Education. 52, 68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson D, Bertolotto M, Weakliam J (2010) Personalizing map content to improve task completion efficiency. International Journal of Geographical Information Science. 24, 7410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood D, Fels J, Krygier J (2010) Rethinking the power of maps. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang C, Raskin R, Goodchild M, Gahegan M (2009) Geospatial cyberinfrastructure: Past, present and future. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems. 34, 264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu C, Peuquet DJ (2009) A GeoAgent-based framework for knowledgeıoriented representation: Embracing social rules in GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science. 23, 923.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 41101370, 41371388 and 41171146) and the Open Research Fund of Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction and Emergency Response Engineering of the Ministry of Civil Affairs under grant no. LDRERE20120302.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hu, M., Lin, H., Che, W., Lin, T., Fan, Z. (2014). Combining Geographical and Social Dynamics in Dynamic 3D Environments. In: Bandrova, T., Konecny, M., Zlatanova, S. (eds) Thematic Cartography for the Society. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08180-9_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics