Skip to main content

Abstract

Robotic-assisted walking training has spread in recent years with positive results regarding its efficacy. However there are few information regarding the target people for a more effective robotic rehabilitation. The present study is aimed to investigate if possible demographic factors can influence robotic-assisted walking training. The study was performed in a neurorehabilitation setting. A total of 74 patients were randomized in robotic-assisted gait training abbreviated conventional therapy (RAGT) and floor-assisted gait training abbreviated conventional therapy intervention (FAGT). Outcome measure was the walking ability measured by Functional Ambulation Classifications (FAC). Results show that in RAGT group walking recovery was more effective for female than males (p=0.0048) and for patients over 65 years (≥65 yrs, p=0.040). This combined gender/age effect was not observed in FAGT group. Among demographic factors gender and age are critical for selecting stroke patients with higher chance of gait robotic gait therapy efficacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Langhammer, B., Stanghelle, J.K., Lindmark, B.: Exercise and health-related quality of life during the first year following acute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Brain Inj. 22, 135–145 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sullivan, K.J., Brown, D.A., Klassen, T., et al.: Physical Therapy Clinical Research Network (PTClinResNet). Effects of taskspecific locomotor and strength training in adults who were ambulatory after stroke: results of the STEPS randomized clinical trial. Phys. Ther. 87, 1580–1602 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nilsson, L., Carlsson, J., Daniellson, A.: Walking training of patients with hemiparesis at an early stage after stroke: a comparison of walking training on a treadmill with body weight support and walking training on the ground. Clin. Rehabil. 15, 515–527 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Iosa, M., Morone, G., Fusco, A., Bragoni, M., Coiro, P., Multari, M., Venturiero, V., De Angelis, D., Pratesi, L., Paolucci, S.: Seven capital devices for the future of stroke rehabilitation. Stroke Res. Treat. 2012, 187965 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Masiero, S., Poli, P., Rosati, G., Zanotto, D., Iosa, M., Paolucci, S., Morone, G.: The value of robotic systems in stroke rehabilitation. Expert. Rev. Med. Devices (January 30, 2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mayr, A., Kofler, M., Quirbach, E., Matzak, H., Fröhlich, K., Saltuari, L.: Prospective, blinded, randomized crossover study of gait rehabilitation in stroke patients using the Lokomat gait orthosis. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 21, 307–311 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Morone, G., Bragoni, M., Iosa, M., De Angelis, D., Venturiero, V., Coiro, P., Pratesi, L., Paolucci, S.: Who benefit from robotic-assisted gait training? A randomized clinical trial in patients with subacute stroke. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 25(7), 636–644 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Morone, G., Iosa, M., Bragoni, M., De Angelis, D., Venturiero, V., Coiro, P., Riso, R., Pratesi, L., Paolucci, S.: Who have durable benefit from robotic gait training?: a 2-year follow-up randomized controlled trial in patients with subacute stroke. Stroke 43(4), 1140–1142 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bragoni, M., Broccoli, M., Iosa, M., et al.: Influence of psychologic features on rehabilitation outcomes in patients with subacute stroke trained with robotic-aided walking therapy. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 92(10, suppl. 2), e16–e25 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Holden, M.K., Gill, K.M., Magliozzi, M.R.: Gait assessment for neurologically impaired patients: standards for outcome assessment. Phys. Ther. 66, 1530–1539 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Paolucci, S., Antonucci, G., Pratesi, L., Traballesi, M., Lubich, S., Grasso, M.G.: Functional outcome in stroke inpatient rehabilitation: predicting no, low and high response patients. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 8(4), 228–234 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Paolucci, S., Bragoni, M., Coiro, P., De Angelis, D., Fusco, F.R., Morelli, D., Venturiero, V., Pratesi, L.: Is sex a prognostic factor in stroke rehabilitation? A matched comparison. Stroke 37(12), 2989–2994 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Paolucci, S., Di Vita, A., Massicci, R., Traballesi, M., Bureca, I., Matano, A., Iosa, M., Guariglia, C.: Impact of participation on rehabilitation results: a multivariate study. Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 48(3), 455–466 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Belda-Lois, J.M., Mena-del Horno, S., Bermejo-Bosch, I., et al.: Rehabilitation of gait after stroke: a review towards a top-down approach. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 8, 66 (2011), doi:10.1186/1743-0003-8-66 (review)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Morone, G. et al. (2014). Effectiveness of Robotic Assisted Walking Therapy: The Role of Age and Sex. In: Jensen, W., Andersen, O., Akay, M. (eds) Replace, Repair, Restore, Relieve – Bridging Clinical and Engineering Solutions in Neurorehabilitation. Biosystems & Biorobotics, vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08072-7_83

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08072-7_83

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08071-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08072-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics