Abstract
The concept of exploitation refers to a very actual, though highly complex, phenomenon in human affairs, generally, and in international biomedical research in particular. There is no consensus as to whether the phenomenon has only a “thick” (i.e., negative) moral connotation, although such a pejorative meaning is mostly associated with it. Exploitation refers to actions that often seem to involve inflicting harm on people, treating people with disrespect or injustice, and interacting with vulnerable people with whom one stands in an unequal relation of power. As such, it usually involves the degradation of human beings who stand in unequal and vulnerable relations to people or institutions that are more privileged. Exploitation can and does often occur in the actual practice of international biomedical research. It thus represents one of the most actual moral risks to be faced and dealt with in efforts to humanize the world via effective medical care. The threat of exploitation invites individuals to develop an enlarged sense of responsibility for their fellow human beings in the developing world. It must be argued that enlarging this sense of responsibility not only requires a heightened sense of altruism. It indeed also implies a more enlightened sense of self-interest.
References
Angell, M. (1997). The ethics of clinical research in the third world. New England Journal of Medicine, 337(12), 847–849.
Benatar, S. R. (2000). Avoiding exploitation in clinical research. Cambridge Quarterly of Health Care Ethics, 9(4), 562–565.
Benatar, S. R. (2001). Commentary: Justice and medical research: A global perspective. Bioethics, 15(4), 333–340. doi:10.1111/1467-8519.00242.
Benatar, S. R., Daar, A., & Singer, P. A. (2003). Global health ethics: The rationale for mutual caring. International Affairs, 79(1), 107–138. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.00298.
Buchanan, A. (1985). Ethics, efficiency and the market. Totowa: Rowman & Allanheld.
Gardels, N. (1993). The post-Atlantic capitalist order. New Perspective Quarterly, Spring,10(2):2–3.
Goodin, R. (1985). Protecting the vulnerable: A re-analysis of our social responsibilities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Goodin, R. (1987). Exploiting a situation and exploiting a person. In A. Reeve (Ed.), Modern theories of exploitation (pp. 166–200). London: Sage.
Goodin, R. (1988). Reasons for welfare. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Healthcare spending around the world, country by country. (2014). Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2012/jun/30/healthcare-spending-world-country. Last accessed 29 Oct 2014.
Macklin, R. (2004). Double standards in medical research in developing countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
National Bioethics Advisory Commission: Ethical Issues in International Research: Setting the Stage. (2001). Retrieved from https://bioethicsarchive.georgetown.edu/nbac/clinical/Chap1.html. Last accessed 29 Oct 2014.
Resnik, D. B. (2003). Exploitation in biomedical research. Theoretical Medicine, 24(3), 233–259.
Sample, R. J. (2003). Exploitation: What it is and why it’s wrong. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Wertheimer, A. (1996). Exploitation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Further Readings
Lurie, P., & Wolfe, S. M. (1997). Unethical trials of interventions to reduce perinatal transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus in developing countries. The New England Journal of Medicine, 337(12), 853–856.
Schroeder. D., & Gefenas, E. (2009). Vulnerability: Too vague and too broad? Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 18(2), 113–121. 10.1017/S0963180109090203.
Varmus, H., & Satcher, D. (1997). Ethical complexities of conducting research in developing countries. The New England Journal of Medicine, 337(14), 1003–1005.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this entry
Cite this entry
van Niekerk, A. (2014). Exploitation. In: ten Have, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_187-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_187-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05544-2
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities