Abstract
There are many variations to the classical randomized controlled trial. These variations are utilized when, for a variety of reasons, the classical randomized controlled trial would be impossible, inappropriate, or impractical. Some of the variations are described in this chapter and include: equivalence and non-inferiority trials; crossover trials; N of 1 trials, case-crossover trials, and externally controlled trials. Large simple trials, and prospective randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint trials are discussed in another chapter.
A man who does not habitually wonder is but a pair of spectacles behind which there is no eye (Thomas Carlyle) [1]
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Breslin JE. Quote Me. Ontario: Hounslow Press; 1990.
Siegel JP. Equivalence and noninferiority trials. Am Heart J. 2000;139:S166–70.
Assay Sensitivity. In: Wikipedia. Available from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assay_sensitivity
Snapinn SM. Noninferiority trials. Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med. 2000;1:19–21.
Walter SD. Choice of effect measure for epidemiological data. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53:931–9.
D’Agostino Sr RB, Massaro JM, Sullivan LM. Non-inferiority trials: design concepts and issues – the encounters of academic consultants in statistics. Stat Med. 2003;22:169–86.
Wiens BL, Zhao W. The role of intention to treat in analysis of noninferiority studies. Clin Trials. 2007;4:286–91.
Diamond GA, Kaul S. An Orwellian discourse on the meaning and measurement of noninferiority. Am J Cardiol. 2007;99:284–7.
Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Altman DG, Pocock SJ, Evans SJ, for the CONSORT Group. Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. JAMA. 2006;295:1152–60.
Jones B, Jarvis P, Lewis JA, Ebbutt AF. Trials to assess equivalence: the importance of rigorous methods. BMJ. 1996;313:36–9.
Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J, Pan G, Singer DE, Hacke W, et al. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:883–91. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1009638.
Pedro-Botet J, Schaefer EJ, Bakker-Arkema RG, Black DM, Stein EM, Corella D, et al. Apolipoprotein E genotype affects plasma lipid response to atorvastatin in a gender specific manner. Atherosclerosis. 2001;158:183–93.
Mahon J, Laupacis A, Donner A, Wood T. Randomised study of n of 1 trials versus standard practice. BMJ. 1996;312:1069–74.
Gabler NB, Duan N, Vohra S, Kravitz RL. N-of-1 trials in the medical literature: a systematic review. Med Care. 2011;49:761–8. doi:10.1097/MLR.0b013e318215d90d.
Hennekens CH, Eberlein K. A randomized trial of aspirin and beta-carotene among U.S. physicians. Prev Med. 1985;14:165–8.
Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL, LaCroix AZ, Kooperberg C, Stefanick ML, et al. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results from the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288:321–33.
Maclure M. The case-crossover design: a method for studying transient effects on the risk of acute events. Am J Epidemiol. 1991;133:144–53.
Hallqvist J, Moller J, Ahlbom A, Diderichsen F, Reuterwall C, de Faire U. Does heavy physical exertion trigger myocardial infarction? A case-crossover analysis nested in a population-based case-referent study. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;151:459–67.
Olson CM, Fontanarosa PB. Advancing cardiac resuscitation: lessons from externally controlled trials. JAMA. 1999;281:1220–2.
Howard G. Nonconventional clinical trial designs: approaches to provide more precise estimates of treatment effects with a smaller sample size, but at a cost. Stroke. 2007;38:804–8.
Shih WJ. Group sequential, sample size re-estimation and two-stage adaptive designs in clinical trials: a comparison. Stat Med. 2006;25:933–41.
Frobert O, Lagerqvist B, Olivecrona GK, et al. Thrombus aspiration during ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2013. [Epub ahead of print]. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1308789.
Lauer MS, D’Agostino RB, Sr. The randomized registry trial – the next disruptive technology in clinical research? N Engl J Med. 2013. [Epub ahead of print]. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1310102.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Glasser, S.P. (2014). Alternative Interventional Study Designs. In: Glasser, S. (eds) Essentials of Clinical Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05470-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05470-4_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-05469-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05470-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)