Abstract
The classical ideal of justice remained vibrant in the Middle Ages because it was embodied in the surviving texts of Roman law, the Corpus Iuris Civilis. From there, it entered canon law, where it gained strength from its association with the divine giver of justice. Justice in the classical tradition was an ideal of distributive justice, a socially fair allocation of things, rendering to each his due. It was an ideal ostensibly linked to outcomes, independent of process. Ideal and practice were never necessarily coincident, however, and it was along that fissure that humanist critiques of law and its practitioners, beginning with Petrarch (20 July 1304–19 July 1374), launched largely ethical arguments. Justice, itself an ethical construct, was being lost, said humanists, in procedural delays and cascades of citations and references, and in bad Latin, that seemingly served only to line the pockets of lawyers, judges, and notaries. By the sixteenth century, the ethical arguments had spilled over into epistemological attacks as well. The quasi-sacred quality of the classical legal texts was confronted by a more thoroughly historical construction of those texts, most frequently associated with the Italian jurist Andrea Alciato (8 May 1492–12 January 1550). This gave birth to such a different method of reading the texts of the Corpus that it came to be called the mos gallicus, in contrast to the older mos italicus, associated in many minds with the fourteenth-century jurist Bartolus of Sassoferrato (1313–1357). Against the assertion that no professional jurist could operate in any other fashion (nemo iurista nisi bartolista), lay the argument that justice lays in appropriate laws that served a people in their peculiar historical context. The legislator (most prominently a king, such as that of France), rather than the academically educated interpreter, was looked to as the font of justice. Justice could thus be reconceived, as it was by figures, such as Jean Bodin (1530–June 1596) and John Locke (29 August 1632–28 October 1704), in terms of a particular state and its ruler and its people, and natural law became unhinged from the realm of objective patterns of behavior and bound to subjective rights instead.
References
Primary Literature
Baldo, Ubaldi. 1585. In primam Digesti veteris commentaria. Venice: Lyon.
Bartolus. 1560. In primam Digesti veteris partem commentaria. Lyon.
Gratian. 1993. The treatise on laws with the ordinary gloss. Trans. A. Thompson and J. Gordley. Washington.
Justinian. 1987. Justinian’s Institutes. Trans. P. Burks and G. McLeod. Ithaca.
Mommsen, T. H., W. Kroll, P. Krueger, and R. Schoell, eds. 1928–29. Corpus iuris civilis. 3 vols. Berlin. Apud Weidmannos
Scala, B. 2008. Essays and dialogues. Trans. R. N. Watkins. Cambridge, MA.
Secondary Literature
Ascheri, M. 1999. Le fonti e la flessibilità del diritto comune: il paradosso del consilium sapientis. In Legal consulting in the civil law tradition, ed. M. Ascheri, I. Baumgärtner, and J. Kirshner, 11–53. Berkeley: The Robbins Collection.
Bellabarba, M. 2008. La giustizia nell’Italia moderna. Laterza: Bari.
Bellomo, M. 1995. The common legal past of Europe, 1000–1800. Trans. L. G. Cochrane. Washington, DC.
Berman, H.J. 1983. Law and revolutions: The formation of the Western legal tradition. Vol. 1. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cerutti, S. 1995. Normes et pratiques, ou de la legitimité de leur opposition In Les formes de l’expérience: une autre histoire sociale, ed. B. Lepetit, 127–49. Paris.
Cortese, E. 2000. Le grandi linee della storia giuridica medievale. Rome.
Fantini, M. G. 1998. La cultura del giurista medievale: Natura, causa, ratio. Milan.
Grossi, P. 1995. L’ordine giuridico medievale. Laterza: Bari.
Janin, H. 2004. Medieval justice: Cases and laws in France, England, and Germany, 500–1500. Jefferson: McFarland and Co..
Kelley, D. 1976. Vera Philosophia: The philosophical significance of renaissance jurisprudence. Journal of the History of Philosophy 14: 267–279.
Kelley, D. 1988. Jurisconsultus Perfectus: The lawyer as Renaissance man. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 51: 84–102.
Kirshner, J. 1999. Consilia as authority in Late Medieval Italy: The case of Florence. In Legal consulting in the civil law tradition, 107–140. Berkeley: The Robbins Collection.
Krantz, F. 1971. Florentine humanist legal thought, 1375–1450. PhD. Diss., Ithaca.
Kuehn, T. 2006. The renaissance consilium as justice. Renaissance Quarterly 59: 1058–1088.
Langer, U. 1999. The renaissance novella as justice. Renaissance Quarterly 52: 311–341.
Manzin, M. 1994. Il petrarchismo giuridico: Filosofia e logica del diritto agli inizi dell’umanesimo. Padua.
Prodi, P. 2000. Una storia della giustizia: Dal pluralismo dei fori al moderno dualismo tra coscienza e diritto. Bologna.
Quaglioni, D. 2004. La giustizia nel Medioevo e nella prima età moderna. Bologna.
Sbriccoli, M. 2001. Giustizia negoziata, giustizia egemonica: riflessioni su una nuova fase degli studi di storia della giustizia criminale. In Criminalità e giustizia in Germania e Italia: pratiche giudiziarie e linguaggi giuridici tra tardo medioevo et età moderna, ed. Bellabarba, M., G. Schwerhoff, and A. Zorzi, 356–? Bologna.
Shaffern, R. W. 2009. Law and justice from antiquity to enlightenment. Lanham.
Shaw, James E. 2006. The justice of Venice: Authorities and liberties in the urban economy, 1550–1700. Oxford.
Vallerani, M. 2012. Medieval public justice. Trans. S. R. Blanshei. Washington, DC.
Zorzi, A. 1994. The judicial system in Florence in the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. In Crime, society and the law in renaissance Italy, ed. Dean, T. and K. J. P. Lowe, 40–58. Cambridge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Kuehn, T.J. (2020). Justice in Renaissance Philosophy. In: Sgarbi, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_201-2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_201-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02848-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02848-4
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities
Publish with us
Chapter history
-
Latest
Justice in Renaissance Philosophy- Published:
- 01 April 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_201-2
-
Original
Justice- Published:
- 27 January 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_201-1