Abstract
This chapter presents the results of the research we have been doing to develop a new methodology to monitor and mainstream sustainability throughout Universiti Sains Malaysia, in keeping with our new vision of “Transforming Higher Education for a Sustainable Tomorrow.” We have focused both on global sustainability challenges and on campus sustainability. In the first part of our research we developed a new tool, a Sustainability Assessment Methodology (SAM), to assess the sustainability content of courses and projects. This method involves a screening step, consisting of three generic questions; an identification step, with 24 more specific questions; and a classification step, in which the results of steps 1 and 2 are used to classify courses and projects as either Green (High), Yellow (Medium), or Red (Low) in terms of sustainability. When we used SAM to do a USM Sustainability Audit, out of 2671 courses examined, 44 % were found to have elements of at least one pillar of the “Triple Bottom Line” sustainability model, 27 % had elements of two pillars, and 9 % had elements of all three pillars. In the second part of our research, we developed a Framework with Four Worksheets that presented targets, tasks, and timelines for sustainability infusion at all levels of USM’s activities. The outcomes of this part of our research provide feedback and guidance to all practitioners to build sustainability content in their mission activities. This may include reorienting existing courses or designing and managing new research and community-oriented projects. Together, the results may be used either for rating or ranking sustainability performance, though we have used them only for rating at this stage.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Indicator framework and worksheets are accessible at: http://cgss.usm.my/images/sustainability_indicators%20version%20for%20reprint%20250110.pdf (All the six (6) links in this paper can be viewed by ‘Ctrl + left-clicking’ the hyperlinks in the text or in the footnote and following prompts (click OK) on the screen.).
- 2.
Indicator worksheets are available at: http://cgss.usm.my/images/sustainability_indicators%20version%20for%20reprint%20250110.pdf.
- 3.
USM-APEX Sustainability Roadmap is accessible at: http://cgss.usm.my/images/sustainability_rm%20version%20for%20reprint%20120110.pdf.
- 4.
WEHAB +3 is available for download at: http://cgss.usm.my/images/wehab%20plus.pdf.
- 5.
USM-APEX Sustainability Fact Sheets are accessible at: http://cgss.usm.my/images/fact%20sheet%20latest%20version%20for%20reprint%20may%2020121LATEST.pdf.
- 6.
The sustainability indicator checklist is available for download at: http://cgss.usm.my/images/si%20new%20check%20list%20sd.pdf.
References
Asif, M., Searcy, C., Zutshi, A., & Ahamd, N. (2011). An Integrated Management Systems Approach to Corporate Sustainability. European Business Review, 23(4), 360.
Alternative University Appraisal (AUA) for ESD in Higher Education Institutions (2010). Creating ESD learning community, a joint project of six ProSPER.Net members—Asian Institute of technology (Thailand), Hokkaido University (Japan), TERI University (India), Universiti Sains Malaysia (Malaysia), Yonsei University (Korea) and United Nations University-Institute of Advanced Studies (Japan). http:www.sustain.hokudai.ac.jp/aua;.
Community Engagement, Universiti Sains Malaysia (2009). Regional Centre Expertise (RCE), Healthy Campus (HC) and Bahagian Hal Ehwal Pembangunan Pelajar (BHEPP).
Fonseca, A., Macdonald, A., Dandy, E., & Valenti, P. (2010). The state of sustainability reporting at Canadian Universities. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 12(1), 24.
Getzner, M. (1999). Weak and strong sustainability indicators and regional environmental resources. Environmental Management and Health, 10(3), 174.
Hak, T., Moldan, B. & Dahl, L. A. (2007). Sustainability Indicators: A Scientific Assessment (Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment (SCOPE) Series). Wasington DC: Island Press. ISBN 13: 978-1597261319.
Hezri, A. A. (2004). Sustainability indicator system and policy processes in Malaysia: A framework for utilisation and learning. Journal of Environmental Management, 73(4), 361.
The World Bank (2002). Millennium Development Goals. World Development Indicators.
Miller, R. T., Munoz-Erikson, T. & Redman, L, C. (2010). Transforming knowledge for sustainability: towards adaptive academic institutions. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 12(2), 177–178.
Ortengren. K. (2004). A Summary of the Theory Behind the LFA Method, the Logical Framework Approach. SIDA, ISBN 91-586-8402-6.
Prabhu, R., Colfer, J. P. C., Venkateswarlu, P., Lay, C. T., Soekmadi, R. & Wollenberg, E. (1996) Testing Criteria and Indicators for the Sustainable Management of Forests. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR).
Razak, A. D., Hamid, A. Z., Sanusi, A. Z., & Koshy, K. C. (2010). Transforming higher education for a sustainable tomorrow: A case of learning by doing at Universiti Sains Malaysia. Tomorrow Today, Learning to Build a Sustainable Future. UNESCO.
Research, Universiti Sains Malaysia (2009). Based on Research Creativity and Management Office website (RCMO); www.usm.my/rcmoSchool Guidebook, Universiti Sains Malaysia (2009): School of Aerospace, School of Chemical Engineering, School of Civil Engineering, School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, School of Materials and Materials Resources Engineering, School of Mechanical Engineering, School of Pharmacy, School of Housing, Building & Planning, School of Physics, School of Chemistry, School of Industrial Technology, School of Mathematics, School of Health Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, School of Computer Sciences, School of Social Sciences, School of Humanities, School of Language, Literacy and Translation, School of Communication, School of Educations, School of Accounting, School of Management.
Sustainability Assessment Questionnaire (SAQ) for Colleges and Universities (2009). Association of University Leaders for a Sustainable Future (ULSF), 2009, ULSF serves as the Secretariat for signatories of the Talloires Declaration, a ten-point action plan committing institutions to sustainability and environmental literacy in teaching and practice. Over 350 university presidents and chancellors in more than 50 countries have signed the Declaration. http://www.ulsf.org/.
Swanepoel, H., & De Beer, F. (2006). Community Development: Breaking the Cycle of Poverty. Landsdowne: Juta and Co Ltd. ISBN 9 780702-171581.
Sustainability Studies Committee, Centre for Global Sustainability Studies (CGSS@USM) (2009). USM-APEX Sustainability Roadmap.
University of Brighton (2010). Using values-based indicators: Guiding notes for Civil society, research and academic institutions. a Smart toolkit for evaluating sustainability projects, Developed by University of Brighton, Univerzita Karlova v Praze, Charles University in Prague. http://www.smarttoolkit.net/?q=node/602.
Acknowledgments
The authors are deeply indebted to the research assistants of the indicator research team (Nordiana binti Mohd Yusoff, Nur Afiqah binti Ismail, Masratul Hawa), to Ratisya Radzi and Nurhazliyana Hanafi of CGSS@USM, Christopher Smith for editing the draft, and to all others who helped to make this project a success.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendix 1
Permutation Combination
|
Appendix 2
Brief check list for SAM–KIPs* and KPIs* (Based on USM-APEX Sustainability Priorities—WEHAB +3)
No. | Indicator type: Impact indicators (8 KIPs); scope—general (check compatibility of statements here to audit items) | + (H) | ~ (M) | – (L) | Remarks (sector/cross-sec) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Depletion of natural capital; institutional arrangements Development footprints; globalization, culture | Environment | |||
2 | Pollution; institutional arrangements Integrated waste management - 3R approach | Environment | |||
3 | Knowledge economy, skills generation; poverty eradication (social uplift) | Economy | |||
4 | Emphasis on “the economy and society are wholly owned subsidiaries of the environment” or “the economic goods and services come from the ecological goods and services” | Economy | |||
5 | Green business for income generation and societal well being | Society | |||
6 | Health, conflict resolution, social capital, democracy, equity, good governance | Society | |||
7 | In human history, there have been ‘waves’ of major innovations. The next wave of innovation will be in Sustainability. EE/ESD as the educational approach for this innovation | EE/ESD | |||
8 | The intent of the ESD decade (2005-14, UNDESD) | EE/ESD | |||
No. | Indicator type: performance indicators (10 KPIs); scope—‘WEHAB + 3’ (WEHAB = water, energy, health, agriculture and biodiversity) | + | ~ | – | Remarks |
9 | Quality and quantity | Water | |||
10 | Distribution and accessibility | Water | |||
11 | Efficiency/accessibility: | Energy | |||
12 | Diversification/renewable energy | Energy | |||
13 | Communicable diseases | Health | |||
14 | Non-communicable diseases | Health | |||
15 | Land use and land cover changes | Agriculture | |||
16 | Food security | Agriculture | |||
17 | Biological goods and services | Biodiversity | |||
18 | Habitat integrity, conservation | Biodiversity | |||
No. | Indicator type: performance indicators (6 KPIs); scope—WEHAB + 3’ (3 = (i): climate change/disaster risk management, (ii): population/poverty, (iii): production/consumption) | + | ~ | – | Remarks |
19 | Science, sectoral impacts and capacity building | Climate change/disaster risk management | |||
20 | Mitigation, adaptation, Networking and Policy | Climate change/disaster risk management | |||
21 | Demography, settlement, natural resources, income generation, and Poverty | Population/poverty | |||
22 | Human capital, education, health, globalization, culture, and governance | Population/poverty | |||
23 | Natural resource use, pollution, policies | Production/consumption | |||
24 | Industry, trade, transportation, business, market, policies | Production/consumption |
Appendix 3
Appendix 4
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Koshy, K.C., Nor, N.M., Sibly, S., Rahim, A.A., Jegatesen, G., Muhamad, M. (2013). An Indicator-Based Approach to Sustainability Monitoring and Mainstreaming at Universiti Sains Malaysia. In: Caeiro, S., Filho, W., Jabbour, C., Azeiteiro, U. (eds) Sustainability Assessment Tools in Higher Education Institutions. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02375-5_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02375-5_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02374-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02375-5
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)