Abstract
The academic literature on reading is largely of a technical nature, most of it having to do with learning.
The degree and type of reading that are done, however, and the motivations and purposes that underpin actual usage, remain less studied.
Yet it could be argued that, once some basic fluency has been established, these factors – which we could put under the general rubric of the social psychology of reading – assume central importance. This chapter summarizes some of the relevant work in the field. Some is narrowly empirical but most involves medium- to large-scale survey approaches.
The chapter concludes by suggesting some fruitful lines for future research.
Notes
- 1.
Both the “professionalization” of literature and arguments against it have quite a long history. The teaching of English literature, for example, was generally resisted by the academy until the mid-nineteenth century (later still in Oxford and Cambridge) – on the grounds that it was of insufficient depth but also because of apprehensions about the baleful influence of “experts.” On the other hand, as early as 1927, Forster heaved a regretful sigh that “the novel tells a story … I wish that it was not so.” The story “runs like a backbone – or may I say a tapeworm” supporting other “finer growths” (p. 45). Here we have the disdain for the obvious – and the obviously appealing – that has so distressed the “common reader” ever since; see also the Leavis influence, later.
- 2.
We might consider following the lead of Hall and Coles (1999) a little more closely. They asked children how they accounted for gender differences in reading. Girls, it was reported, are more mature and sensitive than boys, they are not as physically active, and they have more patience; boys see reading as “sissy” or “square,” they can’t sit still long enough to read, reading is neither “cool” nor “tough,” and so on. In effect, these children were constructing a theory that related socialization in general to reading in particular.
References
Anderson, R., Wilson, P., & Fielding, L. (1988). Growth in reading and how children spend their time outside of school. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 285–303.
Anderson, R., Hiebert, E., Scott, J., & Wilkinson, I. (1985). Becoming a nation of readers. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.
Arms, W. (2000). Digital libraries. Boston: MIT Press.
Baker, N. (2001). Double fold: Libraries and the assault on paper. New York: Random House.
Bauerlein, M. (Ed.). (2005). Reading at risk: A forum. Boston: Association of Literary Scholars and Critics.
Birkerts, S. (1994). The Gutenberg elegies: The fate of reading in an electronic age. New York: Ballantine.
Bloom, H. (2000). How to read and why. New York: Scribners.
Borges, J. L. (1964). Labyrinths. New York: New Directions.
Children’s Literature Research Centre (Roehampton Institute). (1994). Contemporary juvenile reading habits. London: British Library.
Children’s Literature Research Centre (Roehampton Institute). (1996). Young people’s reading at the end of the century. London: Roehampton Institute.
Créatec. (2005). Reading and buying books for pleasure. Montreal: Créatec.
Creative Research Group. (1987). Literacy in Canada. Toronto: CRG.
Edmundson, M. (2004). Why read? New York: Bloomsbury.
Education Quality Accountability Office (EQAO). (1999). Ontario provincial report on achievement. Toronto: EQAO.
Edwards, J. (Ed.). (1981). The social psychology of reading. Silver Spring: Institute of Modern Languages.
Edwards, J. (1991). Literacy and education in contexts of cultural and linguistic heterogeneity. Canadian Modern Language Review, 47, 933–949.
Edwards, J.: 1999, Reading in Nova Scotia, unpublished paper, St Francis Xavier University, Antigonish (Nova Scotia).
Ekos Research Associates. (1991). Reading in Canada. Ottawa: Ekos Research Associates.
Fish, S. (1980). Is there a text in this class? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Forster, E. M. (1927). Aspects of the novel. London: Edward Arnold.
Freeman, S. (2005). End of discussion. American Scholar, 74(1), 138–142.
Greaney, V. (1980). Factors related to amount and type of leisure time reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 15, 337–357.
Greaney, V., & Hegarty, M. (1987). Correlates of leisure‐time reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 10, 3–20.
Greaney, V., & Neuman, S. (1990). The functions of reading: A cross‐cultural perspective. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 172–195.
Hall, C., & Coles, M. (1999). Children’s reading choices. London: Routledge.
Hartley, J. (2001). Reading groups. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Strategies, H. (2005). Who buys books in Canada? Hamilton: Hill Strategies.
Hoggart, R. (1957). The uses of literacy. London: Chatto & Windus.
Hoggart, R. (1995). The way we live now. London: Chatto & Windus.
Ingham, J. (1981). Books and reading development. London: Heinemann.
Kozol, J. (1985). Illiterate America. New York: Doubleday.
Leavis, Q. D. (1965 [1932]) Fiction and the reading public. London: Chatto & Windus.
Link, H., & Hopf, H. (1946). People and books: A study of reading and book‐buying habits. New York: Book Manufacturers’ Institute.
Maeroff, G. (1982). Dismay over those who shun reading. New York Times, 28 September.
Max, D. T. (1994). The end of the book? Atlantic Monthly, September, 61–71.
Max, D. T. (2000). The electronic book. American Scholar, 69(3), 17–28.
McKenna, M., Kear, D., & Ellsworth, R. (1995). Children’s attitudes toward reading: A national survey. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 934–956.
National Endowment for the Arts (NEA). (2004). Reading at risk. Washington, DC: NEA.
Negroponte, N. (1995). Being digital. New York: Knopf.
Nell, V. (1988). Lost in a book: The psychology of reading for pleasure. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Neuman, S. (1986). The home environment and fifth‐grade students’ leisure reading. Elementary School Journal, 3, 335–343.
Neuman, S. (1999). Books make a difference: A study of access to literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 286–311.
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). (2000). Literacy in the information age: Final report of the International Adult Literacy Survey. Paris: OECD.
Oxenham, J. (1980). Literacy: Writing, reading and social organisation. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Rose, J. (2001). The intellectual life of the British working classes. New Haven: Princeton University Press.
Schonfeld, R. (2003). JSTOR: A history. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Strang, R. (1942). Exploration in reading patterns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Taylor, K. (2005). Reading: Even joke books count. Globe & Mail (Toronto), 29 June.
Tinker, M. (1965). Bases for effective reading. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Valpy, M. (2001). Can read, won’t read. Globe & Mail (Toronto), 9 June.
Venezky, R. (1990). Review of Lost in a Book (Nell). American Journal of Psychology, 103, 136–141.
Walker, S. (1990). A survey of reading habits and attitudes in a university population (unpublished report). Psychology Department, St Francis Xavier University.
Waples, D., & Tyler, R. (1931). What people want to read about. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Waples, D., Berelson, B., & Bradshaw, F. (1940). What reading does to people. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Whitehead, F., Capey, A., & Maddren, W. (1974). Children’s reading habits. London: Evans/Methuen.
Whitehead, F., Capey, A., Maddren, W., & Wellings, A. (1977). Children and their books. London: Macmillan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Edwards, J. (2017). Reading Attitudes, Interests, and Practices. In: Street, B., May, S. (eds) Literacies and Language Education. Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02252-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02252-9_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02251-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02252-9
eBook Packages: EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education