Abstract
A first objective of this chapter is to present some interesting roles played by biorobotics in the study of intelligent and adaptive animal behaviour. It will be argued that biorobotic experiments can give rise to different “theoretical outcomes”, including evaluation of the plausibility of an hypothesis, formulation of new scientific questions, formulation of new hypotheses, support for broad theses about intelligence and cognition, support for broad regulative principles in the study of intelligence and cognition. These outcomes flow from variants of a common procedure, which will be sketched here. A second objective is to introduce some methodological and epistemological problems raised by biorobotics, which will be analysed in reference to the structure of the common procedure, notably concerning the setting-up and execution of “good” experiments and the formulation of “good” explanations of animal behaviour. Knowing and dealing with these problems is crucial to justifying the idea according to which robotic implementation and experimentation can offer interesting theoretical contributions to the study of intelligence and cognition.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cordeschi R (2002) The discovery of the artificial: behavior, mind and machines before and beyond cybernetics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
Pfeifer R, Bongard J (2007) How the body shapes the way we think: a new view of intelligence. The MIT Press, Cambridge (MA)
Datteri E, Tamburrini G (2007) Biorobotic experiments for the discovery of biological mechanisms. Phil Sci 74(3):409–430
Datteri E (2009) Simulation experiments in bionics: a regulative methodological perspective. Biol Phil 24(3):301–324
Webb B (2001) Can robots make good models of biological behaviour? Behav Brain Sci 24:1033–1050
Cartwright N (1994) Nature’s capacities and their measurement. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Cummins R (1985) The nature of psychological explanation. The MIT Press, Cambridge (MA)
Tolman E (1948) Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychol Rev 55(4):189–208
Moser E, Kropff E, Moser M (2008) Place cells, grid cells, and the brain’s spatial representation system. Annu Rev Neurosci 31:69–89
Burgess N, Jackson A, Hartley T, O’Keefe J (2000) Predictions derived from modelling the hippocampal role in navigation. Biol Cybern 83(3):301–312
Krichmar J, Seth A, Nitz D, Fleischer J, Edelman G (2005) Spatial navigation and causal analysis in a brain-based device modeling cortical-ippocampal interactions. Neuroinformatics 3(3):197–222
Lambrinos D, Möller R, Labhart T, Pfeifer R, Wehner R (2000) A mobile robot employing insect strategies for navigation. Robot Auton Syst 30:39–64
Reeve R, Webb B, Horchler A, Indiveri G, Quinn R (2005) New technologies for testing a model of cricket phonotaxis on an outdoor robot. Robot Auton Syst 51(1):41–54
Blanchard M, Rind F, Verschure P (2000) Collision avoidance using a model of the locust LGMD neuron. Robot Auton Syst 30(1–2):17–38
Grasso F, Consi T, Mountain D, Atema J (2000) Biomimetic robot lobster performs chemo-orientation in turbulence using a pair of spatially separated sensors: progress and challenges. Robot Auton Syst 30(1–2):115–131
Braitenberg V (1986) Vehicles: experiments in synthetic psychology. The MIT Press, Cambridge (MA)
Tamburrini G, Datteri E (2005) Machine experiments and theoretical modelling: from cybernetic methodology to neuro-robotics. Mind Mach 15(3–4):335–358
Schlimm D (2009) Learning from the existence of models: on psychic machines, tortoises, and computer simulations. Synthese 169:521–538
Simon H (1969) The sciences of the artificial. The MIT Press, Cambridge (MA)
Webb B (2009) Animals versus animats: or why not model the real iguana? Adapt Behav 17(4):269–286
Chou P, Hannaford B (1997) Study of human forearm posture maintenance with a physiologically based robotic arm and spinal level neural controller. Biol Cybern 76(4):285–298
Knight J (2005) Animal behaviour: when robots go wild. Nature 434:954–955
Datteri E, Laudisa F (2012) Model testing, prediction and experimental protocols in neuroscience: a case study. Stud Hist Phil Biol Biomed Sci 43(3):602–610
Webb B (2006) Validating biorobotic models. J Neural Eng 3(3):R25–R35
Woodward J (2003) Making things happen: a theory of causal explanation. Oxford University Press, New York
Psillos S (2002) Causation and explanation. Acumen - McGill Queens University Press, Georgetown, Canada
Hempel C, Oppenheim P (1948) Studies in the logic of explanation. Phil Sci 15(2):135–175
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Datteri, E. (2014). Biorobotics: A Methodological Primer. In: Amigoni, F., Schiaffonati, V. (eds) Methods and Experimental Techniques in Computer Engineering. SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00272-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00272-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-00271-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-00272-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)