Abstract
This study reveals conditions under which a world leader might credibly issue a brinkmanship threat of preemptive action to deter sovereign states or transnational terrorist organizations from acquiring weapons of mass destruction (WMD). The model consists of two players: the United Nations (UN) “Principal,” and a terrorist organization “Agent.” The challenge in issuing a brinkmanship threat is that it needs to be sufficiently unpleasant to deter terrorists from acquiring WMD, while not being so repugnant to those that must carry it out that they would refuse to do so. Two “credibility constraints” are derived. The first relates to the unknown terrorist type (Hard or Soft), and the second to acceptable risks (“blowback”) to the World community. Graphing the incentive-compatible Nash equilibrium solutions reveals when a brinkmanship threat is credible, and when it is not – either too weak to be effective, or unacceptably dangerous to the World community.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Arce, D. and T. Sandler “Terrorist Signaling and the Value of Intelligence,” British Journal of Political Science 37, (2007).
Blight, J. and D. Welch On the Brink: Americans and Soviets Reexamine the Cuban Missile Crisis. Hill and Wang, New York (1989)
Dixit, A. and S. Skeath Games of Strategy. Norton, New York (1998)
Friedman, J., Game Theory with Applications to Economics. Oxford University Press, New York (1986)
Fursenko, A. and T. Naftali, One Hell of a Gamble: The Secret History of the Cuban Missile Crisis. Norton, New York (1997)
Harsanyi, J., “Games with Incomplete Information Played by ‘Bayesian’ Players, I-III. Part I. The Basic Model”, Management Science, 14/3, (1967)
Kagan, D. On the Origins of War and the Preservation of Peace. Doubleday, New York (1995)
May, E. and P. Zelikow eds., The Kennedy Tapes: Inside the White House During the Cuban Missile Crisis. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.: (1997)
Melese, F. and D. Angelis “Deterring Terrorists from Using WMD: A Brinkmanship Strategy for the United Nations,” Defense & Security Analysis 20, (2004)
Rasmusen, E., Games and Information. Blackwell, Cambridge Mass. (1995)
Schelling, T., The Strategy of Conflict. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2002)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag/Wien
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Melese, F. (2009). A Brinkmanship Game Theory Model of Terrorism. In: Memon, N., David Farley, J., Hicks, D.L., Rosenorn, T. (eds) Mathematical Methods in Counterterrorism. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-09442-6_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-09442-6_19
Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna
Print ISBN: 978-3-211-09441-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-211-09442-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)