Abstract
Project-based learning (PBL) is an active learning process that is done by processing experiences. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the progress of student learning. Information from the assessment is used to plan follow-up actions. Through this PBP, teachers are given exposure related to concepts, purposes, characteristics, methods, assessed aspects and applications in the classroom. This article has used the questionnaire method of questionnaire items which are divided into two parts. Part 1 is related to the background of the respondent while part 2 is the importance and needs of the evaluation to replace the primary school assessment Test (PSAT). The findings show that PBL-based assessment is able to be developed into a specific assessment to replace PSAT. In conclusion, the study suggests that project-based learning should be applied as an alternative to replace PSAT.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
A. Meilinger, I. Torok, The importance of friction stir welding tool. Prod. Process Syst. 6(1), 25–34 (2013)
R.H. Ahmad, S. Ghavifekr, School Leadership for the 21st century: A Conceptual Overview. Malays. Online J. Edu. Manag. 2(1), 48–61 (2014)
C.P. Akpan, Perception of principals on parents’ involvement in school-based management in cross river state. Nigeria 2(5), 529–540 (2014)
M. Ashkan, The evolution of design thinking: past, present, and future. Open J. Architectural Des. 2(2), 21 (2014)
M. Boran, F. Karakuş, The mediator role of critical thinking disposition in the relationship between perceived problem-solving skills and metacognitive awareness of gifted and talented students. Participatory Educ. Res. 9(1), 61–72 (2022). https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.4.9.1
M. Carroll, S. Goldman, L. Britos, J. Koh, A. Royalty, M. Hornstein, Destination, imagination and the fires within: design thinking in a middle school classroom, 1–54 (2010)
H.Y. Ching, Design thinking in classroom: an experience with undergrad students of a business course. Bus. Manage. Res. 3(2), 110–119 (2016)
Christensen, C.M., Horn, M.B., Johnson, C.W., Disrupting Class: How Disruptive Innovation Will Change the Way the World Learns (Mc Graw Hill, United States, 2011)
D.R. Krathwohl, A revision of bloom’s taxonomy: an overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212–218 (2002)
K. Dorst, The core of “design thinking” and its application. Des. Stud. 32(6), 521–532 (2011)
F.M. Duffy, C.M. Reigeluth, M. Solomon, G. Caine, A.A.C.-C. Almeida, L, The process of systemic change. TechTrends, 50(2), 41–51 (2006)
C. Duran, E. Güvey Aktay, O. Kuru, Improving the speaking skill of primary school students instructed in a multigrade class through cartoons participatory. Educ. Res. 8(4), 44–63. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.21.78.8.4
C.E. Finn, M.B. Horn, Can digital learning transform education? Education Next, 54–60 (2013)
A. Hanttu, Design Thinking as a Phenomenon: Design Thinking as a Contemporary Phenomenon and as an Object of Discussion (Aalto University, 2013)
L. Hassi, M. Laakso, Conceptions of design thinking in the design and management discourse, in Proceedings of IASDR 2011 (2011), pp. 1–10
H. Assalahi, Learning EFL online during a pandemic: insights into the quality of emergency online education. Int. J. Learn. Teach. Educ. Res. 19(11), 203–222 (2020)
U. Johansson-Sköldberg, J. Woodilla, M. Çetinkaya, Design thinking: past, present and possible futures. Creat. Innovat. Manage. 22(2), 121–146 (2013)
J.H.L. Koh, C.S. Chai, B. Wong, H.-Y. H, Design Thinking for Education: Conceptions and Applications in Teaching and Learning (Springer, Singapore, 2015)
K. Kangas, P. Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, K. Hakkarainen, Design thinking in elementary students’ collaborative lamp designing process. Des. Technol. Educ.: An Int. J. 18(1), 30–41 (2011)
J. Kolko, Abductive thinking and sense making: the drivers of design synthesis. Des. Issues 26(1), 15–28 (2010)
L.H.S. Väisänen, A. Arffman, Exploring students’ experiences of self regulated learning during a large flipped classroom course in teacher education Int. J. Learn. Teach. Educ. Res. 18(13), 107–132 (2019)
B. Lawson, How Designers Think : The Design Process Demystified (4th Editio) (Architectural Press, Oxford, 2005)
B. Lim, A discussion on creativity and design education In Singapore and Malaysia. J. Res. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 3(2), 56–61 (2015)
Malaysia Education Blueprint, M.; Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013–2025. Ministry of Education, Malaysia (2013)
S. Öncü, B. Bıchelmeyer, Instructional practices affecting learner engagement in blended learning environments. Participatory Educ. Res. 8(3), 210–226 (2019). https://doi.org/10.17275/per.21.62.8.3
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Othman, M.S. et al. (2024). The Role of Thinking Using Problem-Based Learning in Twenty-First-Century Teaching in Malaysia. In: Ismail, A., Zulkipli, F.N., Mahat, R., Mohd Daril, M.A., Öchsner, A. (eds) Analyzing Education, Sustainability, and Innovation. SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55948-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55948-8_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-55950-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-55948-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)