Skip to main content

The Neganthropocene Revisited: Entropy, World, Earth

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Pedagogical Encounters in the Post-Anthropocene, Volume 2

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Educational Futures ((PSEF))

  • 28 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter continues to question the Neganthropocene. It specifically revisits issues regarding the entropy of a system. Bataille’s ‘accursed share’ is called on to show alternative ways of thinking about the economy. I review a number of socio-philosophers who are engaged in rethinking the post-Anthropocene along economic lines, especially re-evaluating bio-based economy (BBE). The energy expenditure of the technosphere is raised. I end the chapter by questioning to what extent Heidegger’s philosophical framing is still useful for the post-Anthropocene.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Angelini, A. (2022). Comparing Artificial, Animal and Scientific Intelligence: A Dialogue with Giuseppe Longo. Theory, Culture & Society, 39(7-8), 71–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, R. (2019). Liquid Life: On Non-Linear Materiality. Punctum Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blok, V. (2014). Reconnecting with Nature in the Age of Technology: The Heidegger and Radical Environmentalism Debate Revisited. Environmental Philosophy, 11(2), 307–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blok, V. (2016a). Thinking the earth: Critical Reflections on Quentin Meillassoux’s and Heidegger’s Concept of the Earth. Environmental Ethics, 38(4), 441–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blok, V. (2016b). Biomimicry and the Materiality of Ecological Technology and Innovation: Toward a Natural Model of Nature. Environmental Philosophy, 13(2), 195–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blok, V. (2017). Geoethics Beyond Enmeshment: Critical Reflections on the Post-humanist Position in the Anthropocene. In M. Bohle & E. Marone (Eds.), Geo-societal Narratives. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blok, V. (2020). Heidegger’s Concept of Philosophical Method: Innovating Philosophy in the Age of Global Warming. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blok, V. (2022). The Morendo of the Anthropocene. Foundations of Science, 22(2), 411–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blok, V. (2023a). The Earth Means the World to Me: Earth-and World-Interest in Times of Climate Change. In G. Pellegrino & M. Di Paola (Eds.), Handbook of Philosophy of Climate Change (pp. 1–17). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blok, V. (2023b). The Ontology of Technology Beyond Anthropocentrism and Determinism: The Role of Technologies in the Constitution of the (post) Anthropocene World. Foundations of Science, 28, 987–1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blok, V. (2023c). The Normative and Social Dimension of the Transition Toward a Circular Biobased Economy. In S. Lamalle & P. Stoett (Eds.), Representations and Rights of the Environment (pp. 134–150). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratton, B. (2016). The Stack: On Software and Sovereignty. The MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1994). What is Philosophy? Trans. H. Tomlinson & G. Burchell. Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haff, P. (2013). Technology as a Geological Phenomenon: Implications for Human Well-Being? In C. N. Walters, J. A. Zalasiewicz, M. Williams, M. A. Ellis, & A. M. Snelling (Eds.), A Stratigraphic Basis for the Anthropocene, Geological Society of London Special Publications, 395 (1): 301–309. https://doi.org/10.1144/SP395.4

  • Haff, P. (2014). Maximum Entropy Production by Technology. In R. C. Dewar, C. H. Lineweaver, R. K. Niven, & K. Rengenaur-Lieb (Eds.), Beyond the Second Law: Entropy Production and Non-equilibrium Systems. Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haff, P. (2017). Being Human in the Anthropocene. The Anthropocene Review, 4(2), 103–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M. B. N. (2015). Feed-Forward: On the Future of Twenty-first Century Media. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, S. (2013). What is Life, and Can We Create It? BioScience, 63(8), 609–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemmens, P. (2018). Re-Orienting the Noösphere: Imagining a New Role for Digital Media in the Era of the Anthropocene. Glimpse: A Publication of The Society for Phenomenology and Media, 19, 55–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemmens, P. (2021). Thermodynamics of the Technosphere: Rethinking Temporality and Technicity in the Age of Planetary Emergency with Heider and Stiegler. Glimpse, 22(1), 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemmens, P. (2022a). Thinking Technology Big Again: Reconsidering the Question of the Transcendental and ‘Technology with a Capital T’ in the Light of the Anthropocene. Foundations of Science., 27, 171–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemmens, P. (2022b). The Entanglement of Technology and Nature. In T. Swierstra, P. Lemmens, T. Sharon, & P. Vermaas (Eds.), The Technical Condition: The Entanglement of Technology, Culture and Society (pp. 203–237). Boom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemmens, P., & Hui, Y. (2017). Reframing the Technosphere: Peter Sloterdijk and Bernard Stiegler’s Anthropotechnological Diagnoses of the Anthropocene. Krisis: Journal for Contemporary Philosophy, 2, 25–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lineweaver, C. H., & Egan, C. A. Q. (2008). Life, Gravity and the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Physics of Life Review, 5, 225–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J.-F. (1991). The Inhuman: Reflections on Time. Trans. Geoffrey Bennington. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montévil, M., Stiegler, B., Longo, G., Soto, A., & Carlos, S. (2021). Anthropocene, Exosomatization and Negantropy. In Bernard Stiegler with the Internation Collective (Eds.), Bifurcate: ‘There Is No Alternative,’ Trans. Daniel Ross (pp. 45–62). Open Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, T. (2017). Humankind: Solidarity with Nonhuman People. Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neyrat, F. (2019). The Unconstructable Earth: An Ecology of Separation. Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, M. (2023). Towards a Terrestrially Ontological Philosophy of Technology. Foundations of Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-023-09916-x

  • Schneider, E., & Saga, D. (2006). Into the Cool: Energy Flow, Thermodynamics, and Life. The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sholtz, J. (2015). The Invention of a People. Edinburgh University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Simondon, G. (2017). On the Mode of Existence of Technical Object. Trans. Cecile Malaspine and John Rogove. University of Minnesota Press, Univocal Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloterdijk, P. (2017). The Domestication of Being: The Clarification of the Clearing. In Peter Sloterdijk Not Saved: Essays after Heidegger. Trans. Ian Alexander Moore and Christopher Turner. (pp. 133–148). Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiegler, B. (1998). Technics and Time: The Fault of Epimetheus, Vol. 1, Trans. Richard Beardsworth and George Collins. Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Veraart, R., Blok, V., & Lemmens, P. (2023). Ecomodernism and the Libidinal Economy: Towards a Critical Conception of Technology in the Bio-Based Economy. Philosophy & Technology, 36(18). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-023-00617-8

  • Wills, D. (2017). Ecologies of Communion, Contagion & Especially Bataille. In E. Hörl with J. Burton (Ed.), General Ecology: The New Ecological Paradigm (pp. 235–252). Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwier, J., & Blok, V. (2017). Saving Earth: Encountering Heidegger’s Philosophy of Technology in the Anthropocene. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology. https://doi.org/10.5840/techne201772167

  • Zwier, J., & Blok, V. (2020). Energetic Ethics, Georges Bataille in the Anthropocene. In L. Valera & J. C. Castilla (Eds.), Global Changes: Ethics, Politics and Environment in the Contemporary Technological World (pp. 171–180). Springer Nature AG.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zwier, J., Blok, V., Lemmens, P., & Geerts, R.-J. (2015). The Ideal of a Zero-Waste Humanity: Philosophical Reflections on the Demand for a Bio-Based Economy. Journal of Agriculture Environmental Ethics, 28, 353–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

jagodzinski, j. (2024). The Neganthropocene Revisited: Entropy, World, Earth. In: Pedagogical Encounters in the Post-Anthropocene, Volume 2. Palgrave Studies in Educational Futures. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54783-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54783-6_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-54782-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-54783-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics