Skip to main content

Second-Life Batteries: European Market and Shortcomings in Policy Making

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Sustainable Development with Renewable Energy (ICEER 2023)

Part of the book series: Environmental Science and Engineering ((ESE))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 27 Accesses

Abstract

The transportation electrification is growing fast, especially with batteries and electric vehicles (EV) decreasing prices. Based on the growing number of EV close to end-of-life, a topic became popular, second-life batteries (SLB). SLB are batteries removed from EV when their energy and power density degraded below required level but are still performant enough for other applications. The transportation sector is trending towards electrification, which means a significant change to used batteries’ availability for energy storage systems. Such change has two sides, clean transportation, and battery discard’s increasing volume. SLB also have come in response to the growing number of discarded batteries from expanding EV industry. The objective of this study is to analyse the European scenario for second-life batteries and the policies related to this mater. Data was collected from each European country on sales, collecting and recycling and the current legislation and proposed ones were carefully analysed. Even though there is no reuse data, the collection data of waste batteries is very low, being below target in some countries. Europe has no regulation related to SLB, and the current regulation has many grey areas as it is not adapted to current technology, characteristics, and volume of batteries in the market. Directive 2006/66/EC aims to minimize environmental impact by promoting waste battery recycling and reuse. However, this regulation is outdated and inefficient by today's standards. The EV market growth is leading to fast accumulation of retired batteries. Reusing batteries and extending its life expectancy can reduce environmental impact and improve economic advantages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdel Monem M, Trad K, Omar N, Hegazy O, De Breucker S, Van den Bossche P et al (2016) Lithium-ion batteries: comprehensive technical analysis of second-life batteries to reuse in stationary applications. ECS Meet Abstr MA2016-03:433–433

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng M, Sun H, Wei G, Zhou G, Zhang X (2022) A sustainable framework for the second-life battery ecosystem based on blockchain. Etransportation 14:100206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2022) Energy, climate change, environment. Batter ensuring that batter placed EU mark are sustain circle throughout their whole life cycle

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2022) Zero emission vehicles: first ‘Fit for 55’’ deal will end the sale of new CO2 emitting cars in Europe by 2035.’ Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2010) Commission Regulation (EU) No 1103/2010 of 29 November 2010 establishing, pursuant to Directive 2006/66/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, rules as regards capacity labelling of portable secondary (rechargeable) and automotive batteries and. Off J Eur Union L 313/3

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2012) Commission Regulation (EU) No 493/2012 of 11 June 2012 laying down, pursuant to Directive 2006/66/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, detailed rules regarding the calculation of recycling efficiencies of the recycling processes of waste battle. Off J Eur Union L 151/9

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2014) Report on the availability of mercury-free button cells for hearing aids, in accordance with Article 4.4 of Directive 2006/66/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on batteries and accumulators and waste batteries and accumulators and repealing. Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2015). Final report of the study “Implementation Report for the Directive 2006/66/EC on Batteries and Accumulators”, July 2015. Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2019) Commission report on the implementation and on the impact on the environment and the functioning of the internal market of the Batteries Directive. Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2020). Communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: a new Circular Economy Action Plan For a cleaner and more competitive Europe. Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2022). Guidelines on the application of Commission Regulation EU 493/2012 laying down detailed rules regarding the calculation of recycling efficiencies of the recycling processes of waste batteries and accumulators. Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2022b) Green deal: EU agrees new law on more sustainable and circular batteries to support EU’s energy transition and competitive industry. EU agrees new law more sustain circular batter

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2008) 2008/763/EC: Commission Decision of 29 September 2008 establishing, pursuant to Directive 2006/66/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, a common methodology for the calculation of annual sales of portable batteries and accumulators to end-user. Off J Eur Union L 262/39

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2010). Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and to the Council on the exemption from the ban on cadmium granted for portable batteries and accumulators intended for use in cordless power tools. Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • European Council for an Energy Efficient Economy (2020) EU to target 30 million electrical cars by 2030

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament (2021b) New EU regulatory framework for batteries: Setting Sustainability Requirements

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament (2021a) Updating the EU regulatory framework for batteries: impact assessment (SWD(2020) 335, SWD(2020) 334 (summary)) accompanying a Commission proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning batteries and waste batteries, repetition. Brussels (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament (2023a) Legislative train 05.2023—A European Green Deal—New batteries regulation—Q4 2020. Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament (2023b) Legislative observatory. https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/ficheprocedure.do?reference=2020/0353(COD)&l=en. Last access June 2023

  • European Parliament, Council of the European Union (2006). Consolidated text: Directive 2006/66/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 September 2006 on batteries and accumulators and waste batteries and accumulators and repealing Directive 91/157/EEC. EUR-LEX 2018;02006L0066:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament; Council of the European Union (2020). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning batteries and waste batteries, repealing Directive 2006/66/EC and amending Regulation (EU) No 2019/1020, vol 0353. Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat (2013) Database. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/waste/data/database. Last access June 2013

  • Horesh N, Quinn C, Wang H, Zane R, Ferry M, Tong S et al (2021) Driving to the future of energy storage: techno-economic analysis of a novel method to recondition second life electric vehicle batteries. Appl Energy 295:117007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montes T, Etxandi-Santolaya M, Eichman J, Ferreira VJ, Trilla L, Corchero C (2022) Procedure for assessing the suitability of battery second life applications after EV first life. Batteries 8:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nykvist B, Nilsson M (2015) Rapidly falling costs of battery packs for electric vehicles. Nat Clim Chang 5:329–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rufino Júnior CA, Riva Sanseverino E, Gallo P, Koch D, Kotak Y, Schweiger HG et al (2023) Towards a business model for second-life batteries—Barriers, opportunities, uncertainties, and technologies. J Energy Chem 78:507–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sathre R, Scown CD, Kavvada O, Hendrickson TP (2015) Energy and climate effects of second-life use of electric vehicle batteries in California through 2050. J Power Sources 288:82–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strickland D, Chittock L, Stone DA, Foster MP, Price B (2014) Estimation of transportation battery second life for use in electricity grid systems. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 5:795–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun SI, Chipperfield AJ, Kiaee M, Wills RGA (2018) Effects of market dynamics on the time-evolving price of second-life electric vehicle batteries. J Energy Storage 19:41–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The European Commission (2009) 2009/851/EC: Commission Decision of 25 November 2009 establishing a questionnaire for Member States reports on the implementation of Directive 2006/66/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on batteries and accumulators and waste batteries and a. Off J Eur Union L 312/56

    Google Scholar 

  • The European Commission (2020) Annexes to the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning batteries and waste batteries, repealing Directive 2006/66/EC and amending Regulation (EU) No 2019/1020. Brussels

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has received funding from FEDER Funds through COMPETE program and from National Funds through (FCT) under the project PRECISE (PTDC/EEI-EEE/6277/2020). The authors acknowledge the work facilities and equipment provided by GECAD research center (UIDB/00760/2020) to the project team.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zita Vale .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

de São José, D., Faria, P., Vale, Z. (2024). Second-Life Batteries: European Market and Shortcomings in Policy Making. In: Caetano, N.S. (eds) Sustainable Development with Renewable Energy. ICEER 2023. Environmental Science and Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54394-4_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54394-4_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-54393-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-54394-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics