Skip to main content

Digital Twins of Cities vs. Digital Twins for Cities

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Innovation in Urban and Regional Planning (INPUT 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 467))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 102 Accesses

Abstract

The notion of Digital Twin (DT) gained attention about 15 years ago when sufficient computational capacities became available allowing to develop and run so-called virtual copies of a given physical product. As the evolution of so-called smart cities led to the integration of data-driven decision systems in the traditional urban infrastructure, DTs may become an important element for decision-making in urban contexts but, given the specificities of the latter, here DTs cannot be passively adopted. Information devices and artificial intelligence made their way into city management, but the city cannot be reduced to a digital computer nor an automatised factory indeed. As argued in literature, a city can show a number of structural components such as place, agents, knowledge, and their diverse interaction can make each city special, the urban environment a category on its own. We propose to analyse DTs in the light of these characteristics of cities to understand what role they could play.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.snap4city.org.

  2. 2.

    For a discussion, see the reports in https://restofworld.org/2023/cctv-crime-surveillance-india/.

  3. 3.

    https://www.technologyreview.com/2022/06/29/1054005/toronto-kill-the-smart-city/.

  4. 4.

    https://www.technologyreview.com/2022/06/13/1053650/marseille-fight-surveillance-state/.

References

  1. Borgo, S., Borri, D., Camarda, D., Stufano Melone, M.R.: An ontological analysis of cities, smart cities and their components. In: Nagenborg, M., Stone, T., González Woge, M., Vermaas, P.E. (eds.) Technology and the City: Towards a Philosophy of Urban Technologies, pp. 365–387. Springer, Cham (2021)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Noy, N.F., McGuinness, D.L.: Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology. Stanford Knowledge Systems Laboratory Technical Report. KSL-01–05 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Guarino, N. (ed.): Formal Ontology in Information Systems (FOIS’98), vol. 46. IOS press, Trento (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Borgo, S., et al.: DOLCE: a descriptive ontology for linguistic and cognitive engineering. Appl. Ontol. 17, 45–69 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Okner, T., Preston, R.: Smart cities and the symbiotic relationship between smart governance and citizen engagement. In: Song, H., Srinivasan, R., Sookoor, T., Jeschke, S. (eds.) Smart Cities: Foundations, Principles, and Applications, pp. 343–372. Wiley, London (2017)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Simon, H.A.: Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2, 125–134 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Portugali, J.: Complexity, Cognition and the City. Springer, Berlin (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19451-1

  8. Ismail, L., Zhang, L.: Information Innovation Technology in Smart Cities. Springer, Singapore (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1741-4

  9. McClellan, S., Jimenez, J.A., Koutitas, G.: Smart Cities: Applications, Technologies, Standards, and Driving Factors. Springer, Berlin (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59381-4

  10. Wagg, D., Worden, K., Barthorpe, R., Gardner, P.: Digital twins: State-of-the-art and future directions for modeling and simulation in engineering dynamics applications. ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B Mechanical Eng. 6, (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bhamare, S.S., Yadav, O.P., Rathore, A.: Evolution of reliability engineering discipline over the last six decades: a comprehensive review. Int. J. Reliab. Saf. 1, 377–410 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Freksa, C.: Beyond spatial reasoning: challenges for ecological problem solving. J. Spatial Information Sci. 2020, 43–49 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mark, D.M., Freksa, C., Hirtle, S.C., Lloyd, R., Tversky, B.: Cognitive models of geographical space. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 13, 747–774 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cabalar, P., Falomir, Z., Santos, P.E., Tenbrink, T.: Representing and Solving Spatial Problems (Dagstuhl Seminar 21492). Dagstuhl Reports, vol. 11. Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Howe, L.B.: Thinking through people: the potential of volunteered geographic information for mobility and urban studies. Urban Studies. 58, 3009–3028 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wagner, N., Hassanein, K., Head, M.: Computer use by older adults: a multi-disciplinary review. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26, 870–882 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Stufano Melone, M.R., Borri, D., Camarda, D., Borgo, S.: Knowledge of places: an ontological analysis of the social level in the city. Plurimondi. 18, 111–124 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Batty, M.: Digital twins. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Sci. 45, 817–820 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fischer, F.: Citizens, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge. Duke University Press, Durham (2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Grêt-Regamey, A., Celio, E., Klein, T.M., Wissen Hayek, U.: Understanding ecosystem services trade-offs with interactive procedural modeling for sustainable urban planning. Landsc. Urban Plan. 109, 107–116 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang, H., Pan, Y., Luo, X.: Integration of BIM and GIS in sustainable built environment: a review and bibliometric analysis. Autom. Constr. 103, 41–52 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gottwald, S., Brenner, J., Albert, C., Janssen, R.: Integrating sense of place into participatory landscape planning: merging mapping surveys and geodesign workshops. Landsc. Res. 46, 1041–1056 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Steinitz, C.: A Framework for Geodesign: Changing Geography by Design. Esri, Redlands (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Freksa, C., Nebel, B., Knauff, M., Krieg-Brückner, B.: Spatial Cognition IV, Reasoning, Action, Interaction. Springer, Berlin (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/b106616

  25. Borgo, S., Ferrario, R., Masolo, C. (eds.): Ontology Makes Sense. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Praene, J.P., Malet-Damour, B., Radanielina, M.H., Fontaine, L., Riviere, G.: GIS-based approach to identify climatic zoning: a hierarchical clustering on principal component analysis. Build. Environ. 164, 106330 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Borri, D., Camarda, D., Pluchinotta, I.: Planning for the microclimate of urban spaces: notes from a multi-agent approach. In: Luo, Y. (ed.) Cooperative Design, Visualization, and Engineering (CDVE 2014), vol. 8683, pp. 179–182. Springer, Berlin (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Stufano, R., Borgo, S.: Towards an Understanding of Shapes and Types in Architecture. SHAPES. 47–54 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Calafiore, A., Boella, G., Borgo, S., Guarino, N. (eds.): Urban Artefacts and their Social Roles: Towards an Ontology of Social Practices, vol. 86. Dagstuhl Publishing, Leipzig (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Stufano Melone, M.R., Camarda, D.: Collective knowledge management in city planning: building spatial-cognition ontologies from literary works. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 12983, 115–125 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Geddes, P.: Civics: As applied sociology. The Sociological Review 100–118 (1904)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Friedmann, J.: Planning in the Public Domain. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1987)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Rosaria Stufano Melone .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Stufano Melone, M.R., Borgo, S., Camarda, D. (2024). Digital Twins of Cities vs. Digital Twins for Cities. In: Marucci, A., Zullo, F., Fiorini, L., Saganeiti, L. (eds) Innovation in Urban and Regional Planning. INPUT 2023. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 467. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54118-6_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54118-6_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-54117-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-54118-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics