Skip to main content

Model for New Innovation Knowledge Spreading in Society

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Data-Centric Business and Applications

Abstract

Innovation knowledge begins with the help of objective characteristics of the manifestations of human activity (both in its activity or behavior in communication with a social group). This made it possible to introduce a tuple of quantitative and qualitative parameters as a characteristic of knowledge. It shows how a metric can be entered into a tuple of knowledge (individual, social group, or society). The presence of the metric allows you to set the task of knowledge spreading as a change in the number of people who have a certain tuple of knowledge. The general model for the diffusion mechanism of knowledge spreading is considered. A method of identifying the tuple of knowledge possessed by an individual, social group, or society has been developed. The discussion is an example of the application of this method to important processes that accompany the development of society. It is shown that the obtained results can increase the efficiency of the management of migration processes. The method of determining a set of tuples, the presence of which is necessary for the functioning of a developed country, is described. The possibility of applying the obtained results to increase the efficiency of regional development management is shown.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Shiyan, A.A., Nikiforova, L.O.: Typology of institutions—theory: classification of institutions via the methods for transmission and modification of knowledge. Soc. Sci. Res. Netw. (2013). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2196300. Last accessed 17 Jan 2023

  2. Miao, L., Murray, D., Jung, W.-S., et al.: The latent structure of global scientific development. Nat. Hum. Behav. 6, 1206–1217 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Servaes, J. (ed.): Handbook of Communication for Development and Social Change. Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  4. de Arruda, H.F., Silva, F.N., da Costa, L.F., Amancio, D.R.: Knowledge acquisition: a complex networks approach. Inf. Sci. 421, 154–166 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. de Arruda, H.F., Silva, F.N., Comin, C.H., Amancio, D.R., da Costa, L.F.: Connecting network science and information theory. Phys. A 515, 641–648 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Batista, J.B., da Costa, L.F.: Knowledge acquisition by networks of interacting agents in the presence of observation errors. Phys. Rev. E 82(1), 016103 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lima T.S., de Arruda, H.F., Silva, F.N., et al.: The dynamics of knowledge acquisition via self-learning in complex networks. Chaos Interdiscipl. J. Nonlinear Sci. 28(8), 083106 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pitaeskii, L.P., Lifshitz, E.M.: Physical Kinetics. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Velasquez-Rojas, F., Laguna, M.F.: The knowledge acquisition process from a complex system perspective: observations and models. Nonlinear Dyn. Psychol. Life Sci. J. 25(1), 41–67 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Campisi, M., Ratliff, T., Somersille, S., Veomett, E.: Geography and election outcome metric: an introduction. Elect. Law J. Rules Polit. Policy 21(3), 200–219 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Vanderheiden, E., Mayer, C. (eds.): Mistakes, Errors and Failures Across Cultures. Springer Nature, Switzerland AG (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dalege, J., van der Does, T.: Using a cognitive network model of moral and social beliefs to explain belief change. Sci. Adv. (8), eabm0137 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Grant, M., Vernall, L., Hill, K.: Can the research impact of broadcast programming be determined? Res. All 2(1), 122–130 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Williams, S.M.: The research impact of broadcast programming reconsidered: academic involvement in programme-making. Res. All 3(2), 218–223 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chris, D., White, P.A., Sajonia-Coburgo-Gotha, B.: What Happened, and Who Cared? Evidencing Research Impact Retrospectively. arXiv.org (2021). https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.06778. Last accessed 17 Jan 2023

  16. Haddad, G., Nagpal, G.: Can students’ perception of the diverse learning environment affect their intentions toward entrepreneurship? J. Innov. Knowl. 6, 167–176 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ruoslahti, H.: Complexity in project co creation of knowledge for innovation. J. Innov. Knowl. 5, 228–235 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bhattacharya, J., Packalen, M.: Stagnation and Scientific Incentives. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper 26752 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3386/w26752. Last accessed 17 Jan 2023

  19. Park, M., Leahey, E., Funk, R.: Dynamics of Disruption in Science and Technology. arXiv.org (2021). https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.11184. Last accessed 17 Jan 2023

  20. Petrov, M.K.: Language, Symbol, Culture. Nauka, Moscow (1991) (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kuhn, T.S.: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Acemoglu, D., Robinson, J.A.: Why Nations Fail? The Origin of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. Random House, Inc., New York (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Stoshikj, M., Kryvinska, N., Strauss, C.: Service systems and service innovation: two pillars of service science. Procedia Comput. Sci. 83, 212–220 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.04.118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rauer, J.N., Kroiss, M., Kryvinska, N., Engelhardt-Nowitzki, C., Aburaia, M.: Cross-university virtual teamwork as a means of internationalization at home. Int. J. Manag. Educ. 19, 100512 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Abbasi, A., Javed, A.R., Iqbal, F., Jalil, Z., Gadekallu, T.R., Kryvinska, N.: Authorship identification using ensemble learning. Sci. Rep. 12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13690-4

  26. Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of Innovations. The Free Press, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kreindler, G.E., Young, H.P.: Rapid innovation diffusion in social networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111, 10881–10888 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Berliant, M., Fujita, M.: Culture and diversity in knowledge creation. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 42(4), 648–662 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Coursera. https://www.coursera.org/. Last accessed 17 Jan 2023

  30. Del Vicario, M., Bessi, A., Zollo, F., et al.: The spreading of misinformation online. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113(3), 554–559 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bago, B., Rand, D.G., Pennycook, G.: Fake news, fast and slow: deliberation reduces belief in false (but not true) news headlines. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 149(8), 1608–1613 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Furioli, G., Pulvirenti, A., Terraneo, E., Toscani, G.: Fokker-Planck equations in the modeling of socio-economic phenomena. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 27(01), 115–158 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Program for International Student Assessment (PISA). https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/pisa/. Last accessed 17 Jan 2023

  34. Staab, S., Studer, R. (eds.): Handbook on Ontologies, International Handbooks on Information Systems. Springer, Berlin (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Shen, W.: The achievement, limitation and potential of Chinese Universities in STEM fields: a generational perspective. Univ. Intellect. 1(1), 49–56 (2021). https://cerc.edu.hku.hk/universities-and-intellectuals/1-1/the-achievement-limitation-and-potential-of-chinese-universities-in-stem-fields-a-generational-perspective/?fbclid=IwAR3KvG2OsOWVyXKQCJd9bqPYrT0-b4gdKthj_lK2MHHMLbaljqvMfuvgj1g. Last accessed 17 Jan 2023

  36. Shyian, A., Nikiforova, L.: The role of the state in optimizing communication between generation Z and migrants in the human resources management. In: Leon, R.-D. (ed.) Strategies for Business Sustainability in a Collaborative Economy, pp. 17–36. IGI Global, Hershey, PA (2020)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anatolii Shyian .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Shyian, A., Nikiforova, L. (2024). Model for New Innovation Knowledge Spreading in Society. In: Semenov, A., Yepifanova, I., Kajanová, J. (eds) Data-Centric Business and Applications. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, vol 195. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54012-7_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics