Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Material Selection to Reinforce Circular Economy Trajectories in Industrial Companies: The O.S.M.O.S.I.S. Methodology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
For Nature/With Nature: New Sustainable Design Scenarios

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Design and Innovation ((SSDI,volume 38))

  • 124 Accesses

Abstract

The shift towards new economic models is rapidly modifying the way we conceive our products in a systemic way. Diverse business strategies have been developed to tempt companies in adopting new visions, while governmental regulations are pushing towards a strong paradigmatic change of the industrial production to valorize raw materials use. To manage the quantity and the quality of resources deployed into artifacts a material selection (MS) activity is necessary. Several MS theories, methodologies and tools have been studied in research since years. However, their implementation in the dynamics of industrial companies’ routine is difficult to pursue, mainly if their introduction needs to fit in well-defined working paths. Direct cooperation with an Italian company’s employees has been crucial to understand that finding a new MS approach supporting new economic models’ visions without neglecting its traditional pillars and the industrial needs is missing. By adopting a mixed methodology, the research has been oriented to participatory action research, to ground MS activity. Hence, a novel MS approach is proposed: considering technical, hedonic and ethic aspects of raw materials, MS has been investigated interdisciplinary, intending it as an organic activity between different company departments. The proposed work represents a starting point for interpreting the MS task as a process enhancing the way materials are deployed into industrial companies, since they need to build core competencies to facilitate product and components cascading, with prompt intervention on product design activity in the daily practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ashby MF (2022) Materials and sustainable development. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby M, Johnson K (2003) The art of materials selection. Mater Today 6(12):24–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashby MF, Johnson K (2013) Materials and design: the art and science of material selection in product design. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby MF, Brechet YJM, Cebon D, Salvo L (2004) Selection strategies for materials and processes. Mater Des 25(1):51–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayres R, Van den Berrgh J, Gowdy J (2001) Strong versus weak sustainability: economics, natural sciences, and consilience. Environ Ethics 23(2):155–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldassarre B, Schepers M, Bocken N, Cuppen E, Korevaar G, Calabretta G (2019) Industrial symbiosis: towards a design process for eco-industrial clusters by integrating circular economy and industrial ecology perspectives. J Clean Prod 216:446–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berná-Martínez JV, Maciá-Pérez F, Raspeig CS (2012) Overcoming resistance to change in business innovation processes. Int J Eng Technol 4(3):148–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilandzic M, Venable J (2011) Towards participatory action design research: adapting action research and design science research methods for urban informatics. J Commun Inf 7(3):1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowden G (2017) An environmental sociology for the Anthropocene. Can Rev Sociol 54(1):48–68

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen S, Durrant A, Nissen B, Bowers J, Wright P (2016) The value of designers’ creative practice within complex collaborations. Des Stud 46:174–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camere S, Karana E (2018) Fabricating materials from living organisms: an emerging design practice. J Clean Prod 186:570–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell JW, Creswell JD (2017) Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Crutzen PJ, Stoermer EF (2000) Global change newsletter. The Anthropocene 41:17–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies M (2011) Concept mapping, mind mapping and argument mapping: what are the differences and do they matter? High Educ 62:279–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desmet PMA (2002) Designing emotions. Delft University of Technology, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  • Dokter G, Thuvander L, Rahe U (2021) How circular is current design practice? Investigating perspectives across industrial design and architecture in the transition towards a circular economy. Sustain Prod Consumption 26:692–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorst K (2018) Mixing practices to create transdisciplinary innovation: a design-based approach. Technol Innov Manage Rev 8(8):60–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2014) Towards the circular economy, vol. 3: accelerating the scale-up across global supply chain. Ellen Macarthur Foundation, Cowes

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2015) Growth within: a circular economy vision for a competitive Europe. Retrieved Feb 7, 2023 from https://ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/growth-within-a-circular-economy-vision-for-a-competitive-europe

  • Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2020) Higher education resources. https://ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/higher-education-resources

  • Eppler MJ (2006) A comparison between concept maps, mind maps, conceptual diagrams, and visual metaphors as complementary tools for knowledge construction and sharing. Inf vis 5(3):202–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erkman S (1997) Industrial ecology: an historical view. J Clea Prod 5(1–2):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2018) Directive (EU) 2018/851 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 amending Directive 2008/98/EC on waste (Text with EEA relevance). Retrieved Feb 7, 2023 from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32018L0851

  • European Commission (2020). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Sustainable Europe Investment Plan European Green Deal Investment Plan. Retrieved Feb 7, 2023 from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=COM:2020:98:FIN

  • European Commission (2022) Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council: establishing a framework for setting Ecodesign requirements for sustainable products and Repealing Directive 2009/125/EC. Retrieved Oct 3, 2023 from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:52022PC0142

  • Gharajedaghi J (2011) Systems thinking: managing chaos and complexity: a platform for designing business architecture. Elsevier, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi A (1997) The theory, practice, and evaluation of the phenomenological method as a qualitative research procedure. J Phenom Psychol 28(2):235–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haraway DJ (2016) Staying with the trouble: making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press, Durham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey WS (2011) Strategies for conducting elite interviews. Qual Res 11(4):431–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Head L (2014) Contingencies of the Anthropocene: lessons from the ‘neolithic.’ Anthro Rev 1(2):113–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiao W, Boons F (2014) Toward a research agenda for policy intervention and facilitation to enhance industrial symbiosis based on a comprehensive literature review. J Clean Prod 67:14–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones P (2018) contexts of co-creation: designing with system stakeholders. Systemic design: theory, methods, and practice, Springer, Cham, pp 3–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones P (2021) Systemic design: design for complex, social, and sociotechnical systems. Handbook of systems sciences. Springer, Singapore, pp 787–811

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jones P, Bowes J (2017) Rendering systems visible for design: synthesis maps as constructivist design narratives. She Ji J Des Econ Innov 3(3):229–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karana E, Hekkert P, Kandachar P (2008a) Material considerations in product design: a survey on crucial material aspects used by product designers. Mater Des 29(6):1081–1089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karana E, Hekkert PPM, Kandachar PV (2008b) Materials experience: descriptive categories in materials appraisals. Seventh International Symposium on Tools and Methods of Competitive Engineering-TMCE 2008. Turkey. Delft University of Technology/Middle East Technical University, Izmir, pp 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Ljungberg LY (2007) Materials selection and design for development of sustainable products. Mater Des 28(2):466–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minder B, Heidemann Lassen A (2018) The designer as facilitator of multidisciplinary innovation projects. Des J 21(6):789–811

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore A (2016) Anthropocene anthropology: reconceptualizing contemporary global change. J Roy Anthropol Inst 22(1):27–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morton T (2016) Dark ecology: for a logic of future coexistence. Columbia University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Neves A, Godina R, Azevedo SG, Matias JC (2020) A comprehensive review of industrial symbiosis. J Clean Prod 247:119113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor F, Hawkes D (2001) A multi-stakeholder abridged environmentally conscious design approach. J Sustain Prod Des 1(4):247–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papile F, Del Curto B, and Coccia A (2020) System thinking & synthesis mapping to manage product material selection process. In: Proceedings of relating systems thinking and design (RSD9) 2020 Symposium, 9–17 Oct 2020, Ahmedabad, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papile F, Del Curto B, Coccia A (2021) Material selection as cooperative process: a framework proposal for a changing economy. Proc Des Soc 1:2017–2026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papile F, Sossini L, Marinelli A, Del Curto B (2022) Emerging material research trends: fostering critical material research in design students. Proc Des Soc 2:2353–2362. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2022.238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prendeville S, O’Connor F, O’Rafferty S, Palmer L, Orangebox H, Mynach Y, Luke W (2013) Material selection and design for sustainable material innovation. In 10th European academy of design conference—crafting the future, pp 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowland G (2019) Developing systemic design tools: the CHRIIS model

    Google Scholar 

  • Savic S, Huang J (2014) Research through design: what does it mean for a design artefact to be developed in the scientific context? In Proceedings of the 5th STS Italia Conference: a matter of design. Making Society through Science and Technology (No. CONF, pp 409–423). STS Italia Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Sevaldson B (2011) GIGA-Mapping: visualisation for complexity and systems thinking in design. Nordic Design Research Conference

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahel WR (2008) The performance economy: business models for the functional service economy. In: Misra KB (ed) Handbook of performability engineering. Springer, London, pp 127–138

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stappers PJ, Giaccardi E (2017) Research through design. In The encyclopedia of human-computer interaction. The Interaction Design Foundation, Aarhus, pp 1–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffen W, Broadgate W, Deutsch L, Gaffney O, Ludwig C (2015) The trajectory of the Anthropocene: the great acceleration. Anthrop Rev 2(1):81–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thackara J (2006) In the bubble: designing in a complex world. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Trischler H (2016) The anthropocene: a challenge for the history of science, technology, and the environment. NTM Z Gesch Wiss Tech Med 24(3):309–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Unger D, Eppinger S (2011) Improving product development process design: a method for managing information flows, risks, and iterations. J Eng Des 22(10):689–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2015) Sustainable development goals. Retrieved Feb 7, 2023 from https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/

  • Van Kesteren I, de Bruijn S, Stappers PJ (2008) Evaluation of materials selection activities in user-centred design projects. J Eng Des 19(5):417–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WCED (1987) Our common future, vol 17. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 1–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildemuth BM (2009) Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science. Libraries Unlimited. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman J, Stolterman E, Forlizzi J (2010) An analysis and critique of research through design: towards a formalization of a research approach. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM conference on designing interactive systems, pp 310–319

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Polytechnic University of Milan, Milan, Italy

    Flavia Papile & Barbara Del Curto

  2. INSTM, National Interuniversity Consortium of Materials Science and Technology, Florence, Italy

    Barbara Del Curto

Authors
  1. Flavia Papile
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Barbara Del Curto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Flavia Papile .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department Architecture & Industrial Design, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Aversa, Italy

    Claudio Gambardella

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Papile, F., Del Curto, B. (2024). Material Selection to Reinforce Circular Economy Trajectories in Industrial Companies: The O.S.M.O.S.I.S. Methodology. In: Gambardella, C. (eds) For Nature/With Nature: New Sustainable Design Scenarios. Springer Series in Design and Innovation , vol 38. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53122-4_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53122-4_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-53121-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-53122-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation