Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Design After the Anthropocene

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
For Nature/With Nature: New Sustainable Design Scenarios

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Design and Innovation ((SSDI,volume 38))

  • 120 Accesses

Abstract

The Anthropocene refers to the current geological epoch in which our species has become a primary driver of global environmental change and the main geological force on Earth. However, many consider it as reductive, since it hides the real political questions and prefer the term Capitalocene (Moore in Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, history, and the crisis of capitalism, PM Press, Oakland, ON, 2016) or Technocene (Sloterdijk in Art in the Anthropocene: encounters among aesthetics, politics, environments and epistemologies. Open Humanities Press, London, pp 327–339, 2015). Design is at the center of unsustainable production/consumption systems; since its birth as a practice and discipline, it has actively promoted unsustainable ideas of well-being and lifestyles. Half a century after Papanek’s searing criticism of the trajectory Design has taken (1971), the idea of the guiltiness of even the most positively intentioned Design for ecological and social sustainability seems to be becoming a real concern. Even when engaged in critical practice, questions about the depth of Design’s impact and its long-term sustainability remain. A deeper understanding of the political economy of Design is needed. If the question is how Designers could become care providers by transforming themselves into politicized change agents (Fry in Design as politics. Berg, Oxford, 2010), one possible answer is the promotion of a Design-led societal transition to more sustainable long-term futures (Irwin in Transition design: a proposal for a new area of design practice, study, and research, design and culture. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, 2015). This means imagining different futures where Design could contribute to prefiguring (DiSalvo in J Des Strat 8:29–35, 2016) the forms of collective action to improve the resilience to the present/near-future climate change issues. What is the role of Design in the construction of post-capitalist, therefore, post-Anthropocene imaginaries? Could Design contribute to shifting paradigms from an extractivist growth economy to a resource one; focusing on actions rather than consumption?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdulla D, Ansari A, Keshavarz M, Kiem M, Oliveira P, Prado L, Republic M, Schultz T, Australia G (2019) A manifesto for decolonising design. J Futur Stud 23(3):129–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht G (2019) Earth emotions: new words for a new world. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ansari A (2016) Towards a design of, from & with the global south. Carnegie Mellon University

    Google Scholar 

  • Azmanova A (2020) Anti-capital in the XXIst century (on the metacrisis of capitalism and the prospects for radical politics). Philos Soc Criticism 46(4):601–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balamir S (2017) Commoning in postcapitalist design practices. XVI Biennial IASC Conference “Practicing the Commons”, 10–14 June 2017, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Balamir S (2021) Unsustaining the commodity-machine: commoning practices in postcapitalist design. Dare.uva.nl. https://hdl.handle.net/11245.1/41641ebe-104c-4572-9b5f-56f64c9390a1

  • Bauwens M (2009) Class and capital in peer production. Capital & Class, 33(1), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/030981680909700107

  • Bauwens M, Kostakis V, Pazaitis A (2019) Peer to Peer: The Commons Manifesto (Vol. 10). University of Westminster Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvfc53qf

  • Björgvinsson E (2014) The making of cultural commons: nasty old film distribution and funding. In P. Ehn, E.M. Nilsson, & R. Topgaard (Eds.), Making futures: marginal notes on innovation, design and democracy. MIT Press. CC:BY-NC

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehnert J (2018) Design, ecology, politics. Bloomsbury, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boehnert J, Elzenbaumer B, Onafuwa D (2016) Design a symbolic violence: addressing the ‘isms’. Loughborough University. Conference contribution

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollier D (2014) Think like a commoner. A short introduction to the life of the commons. Gabriola island, bc: New society publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollier D, Helfrich S (2019) Free, fair, and alive: the insurgent power of the commons. New society publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnet E, Landivar D, Monnin A, Allard L (2019) Le Design, une cosmologie sans monde face à l’Anthropocène. Sci Des 10(2):97–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Bookchin M (1986) The modern crisis. New Society Publishers, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Bookchin M (2006) Social ecology and communalism. Ak Press, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Bookchin M (2011) Une société à refaire: vers une écologie de la liberté. Éditions Écosociété, Montréal

    Google Scholar 

  • Borras SM, Franco JC (2009) Transnational agrarian movements struggling for land and citizenship rights. IDS Work Pap 2009(323):01–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2040-0209.2009.00323_2.x

  • Brown T (2009) Change by design: how design thinking creates new alternatives for business and society. Collins Business; Enfield, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Busch OV, Palmås K (2016) Social means do not justify corruptible ends: a realist perspective of social innovation and design. She Ji: J Des Econ Innov 2(4)(Winter):275–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassel J, Cousineau S (2018) Permaculture as a systemic design practice, systemic design, translational Systems sciences 8, springer Japan

    Google Scholar 

  • Castro-Gomez S (2005) La hybris del punto cero: Ciencia, raza e ilustración en la Nueva Granada (1750–1816) (2nd ed.). Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt15hvx8r

  • Centemeri L (2018) Commons and the new environmentalism of everyday life: Alternative value practices and multispecies commoning in the permaculture movement. Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia. doi:ffhal-01773575

  • Cetin OD (2016) Design activism from the past to present: A critical analysis of the discourse. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Design History and Design Studies. https://doi.org/10.5151/despro-icdhs2016-04_016

  • Chakrabarty D (2019) The planet: an emergent humanist category. Crit Inq 46(1):1–31

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke AJ (2013) “Actions Speak Louder”: Victor Papanek and the Legacy of Design Activism. Design and Culture, 5(2), 151–168. https://doi.org/10.2752/175470813x13638640370698

  • Coriat B, Bauwens M (2015) Le retour des communs : la crise de l’idéologie propriétaire. Les Liens qui libèrent. Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Crutzen PJ, Stoermer EF (2000) : The “Anthropocene”, Global Change Newsletter, 41, 17–18

    Google Scholar 

  • D’alisa G, Demaria F, Kallis G (2015) Degrowth: a vocabulary for a new era. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dardot P, Laval C (2014) Commun : essai sur la révolution au XXIe siècle. La Découverte

    Google Scholar 

  • De Angelis M (2017) Omnia sunt communia on the commons and the transformation to postcapitalism. Zed Books, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Denoual F (2020) Le Designer de l’Anthropocène: vers une éthique de l’habitabilité élargie. Sci Des 11:42–50

    Google Scholar 

  • DiSalvo C (2016) Design and prefigurative politics. J Des Strat 8(1):29–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne A, Raby F (2013) Speculative everything. Design, fiction and social dreaming. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Elzenbaumer B (2013) Designing economic cultures: cultivating socially and politically engaged design practices against procedures of precarisation. December 1. Research.gold.ac.uk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elzenbaumer B, Graziano V, Trogal K (2016) Introduction: the politics of commoning and design. DRS2016: Future-Focused Thinking. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2016.614

  • Escobar A (1995) Encountering development: the making and unmaking of the third world (STU-Student edition). Princeton University Press, Princeton. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt7rtgw

  • Escobar A (2015) Degrowth, postdevelopment, and transitions: a preliminary conversation. Sustain Sci 10(3):451–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escobar A (2018) Designs for the pluriverse. Radical interdependence, autonomy, and the making of worlds. Duke University Press, Durham

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster H (2002) Design and crime (and other diatribes). Verso Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Federici S (2011) Women, land struggles, and the reconstruction of the commons. Working USA, 14(1), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-4580.2010.00319.x

  • Federici S (2019) Le capitalisme patriarcal. La Fabrique Éditions

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire P (1970) Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Seabury Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry T (2009) Design futuring: sustainability, ethics and new practice. Berg, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fry T (2010) Design as politics. Berg, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry T (2017) Design for/by “The global south.” Des Philos Pap 15(1):3–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry T (2019) Starting at the End: A Journey in Time. Journal of Futures Studies, 23(4), 159–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry T (2020) Defuturing: a new design philosophy. Bloomsbury Visual Arts, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fuad-Luke A (2009) Design Activism: Beautiful Strangeness for a Sustainable World. Earthscan, London-Sterling, Virginia

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgescu-Roegen N, Grinevald J, Rens I (1979) La décroissance: entropie, écologie, économie. Bibliothèque Paul-Émile Boulet de l’Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, Chicoutimi

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson-Graham JK, Cameron J, Healy S (2013) Take back the economy: an ethical guide for transforming our communities. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haiven M (2014) Crises of imagination: capitalism, culture and resistance in a post-crash world. Zed Books, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haiven M, Khasnabish A (2014) The radical imagination: social movement research in the age of austerity. Zed Books, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haraway DJ (2016) Staying with the trouble—making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press, Durham and London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hardt M, Negri A (2009) Commonwealth. Belknap Press, Cumberland

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey D (2012) Rebel cities: from the right to the city to the urban revolution. Verso

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey D (2017) Marx, capital and the madness of economic reason. The concept, the book, the history. Profile Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess C (2008) Mapping the New Commons. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1356835

  • Hess C, Ostrom E (2007) Understanding Knowledge as a Commons from Theory to Practice. The Mit Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2018) Summary for policymakers. In: Global warming of 1.5°C

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin T (2015) Transition design: a proposal for a new area of design practice, study, and research, design and culture. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin T (2018) The Emerging Transition Design Approach. Cuadernos Del Centro de Estudios de Diseño Y Comunicación, 73. https://doi.org/10.18682/cdc.vi73.1043

  • Julier G (2008) Practising design culture. Design, Pedagogy, Research: Leeds 2007, 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Julier G (2013) The culture of design. Sage, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • Julier G (2017) Economies of design. Sage, Los Angeles

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kalantidou E, Fry T (2014) Design in the borderlands. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Klein N (2014) This changes everything: capitalism vs. the climate. Simon and Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kothari A, Demaria F, Acosta A (2014) Buen Vivir, degrowth and ecological Swaraj: alternatives to sustainable development and the green economy. Development 57(3–4):362–375. https://doi.org/10.1057/dev.2015.24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour B (2015) Face à Gaïa: huit conférences sur le nouveau régime climatique. Les Empêcheurs De Penser En Rond, Dl, Paris

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Linebaugh P (2012) Enclosures from the bottom up, in D. Bollier and S. Helfrich, eds, The Wealth of the Commons: A World Beyond Market and State, Leveller Press, Amherst, MA, pp. 114–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Linebaugh P (2014) Stop, thief! : The commons, enclosures and resistance. Pm Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Maldonado T (1972) Environnement et idéologie (vers une écologie critique). (G. Joppolo, Trad.). Le Monde en 10/18. Union générale d'éditions

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzini E, Jégou F (2003) Sustainable everyday: scenarios of urban life. Ambiente, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolin V (2007) Design, the future and the human spirit. Des Issues 23(3):4–15. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi.2007.23.3.4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolin V, Margolin S (2002) A ‘social model’ of design: issues of practice and research. Des Issues 18(4):24–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Torres ME, Rosset PM (2010) La Vía Campesina: the birth and evolution of a transnational social movement. J Peasant Stud 37(1):149–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150903498804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marttila S (2016) From rules in use to culture in use—commoning and infrastructuring practices in an open cultural movement. In: Lloyd P, Bohemia E (eds) Future focused thinking—DRS International Conference 2016, 27–30 June, Brighton, UK. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2016.454

  • Marttila S, Botero A, Saad-Sulonen J (2014) Towards commons design in participatory design. Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference—PDC ’14—Volume 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Mau S (2004) The moral economy of welfare states. Taylor and Francis, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McNeill JR, Engelke P (2014) The great acceleration: an environmental history of the Anthropocene since 1945 [online]. JSTOR. Harvard University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvjf9wcc

  • Meadows DH (1972) The limits to growth: a report for the Club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. Universe Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Meurer, B (2001) The transformation of design. Des Issues 17(1):44–53. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1511908

  • Merino R (2016) An alternative to “alternative development”? Buen vivir and human development in Andean countries. Oxf Dev Stud 44(3):271–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2016.1144733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midnight Notes #10 (1990)—new enclosures. Libcom.org

    Google Scholar 

  • Mignolo, Walter D. (2009). Epistemic disobedience, independent thought and decolonial freedom. Theory, Culture and society 26 (7–8):159–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Mollison B (1988) Permaculture: A Designer's Manual. Tyalgum. Australia: Tagari Publications

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore WJ (2016) Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, history, and the crisis of capitalism. PM Press, Oakland, ON

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum B (2010) Is humanitarian design the new imperialism? Does our desire to help do more harm than good? https://www.fastcompany.com/1661859/is-humanitarian-design-the-new-imperialism

  • Onafuwa D (2018) Allies and decoloniality: a review of the intersectional perspectives on design, politics, and power symposium. Des Cult 10(1):7–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2018.1430995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. New York: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswald A, Stern N (2019) Why does the economics of climate change matter so much, and why has the engagement of economists been so weak? https://www.andrewoswald.com/docs/ClimatechangeOswaldSternSept2019forRES.pdf

  • Patel R, Moore JW (2017) A history of the world in seven cheap things: a guide to capitalism, nature, and the future of the planet. University of California Press, Oakland, p 289

    Google Scholar 

  • Papanek V (1971) Design for the real world: human ecology and social change. Pantheon Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigot E, Strayer J (2020) Retour vers 1972: rouvrir les possibles pour le Design et l’économie face aux effondrements. Sci Des 11:32–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosa H, Scheuerman WE (2019) High-speed society: social acceleration, power, and modernity. Pennsylvania State University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos BS (2014) Epistemologies of the south: justice against epistemicide. Routledge, Abibgdon. ISBN 9781612055459

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs W (ed) (1992) The development dictionary. A guide to knowledge as power. Zed Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlosberg D, Coles R (2015) The new environmentalism of everyday life: sustainability, material flows, and movements. Contemp Polit Theory 15(2):160–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scranton R (2015) Learning to die in the Anthropocene. Reflections on the end of a civilization. City Light Books, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Servigne P, Stevens R (2015) Comment tout peut s’effondrer. Petit manuel de collapsologie à l’usage des générations présentes. Editions du Seuil, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloterdijk P (2015) The Anthropocene: a process-state at the edge of geohistory? In: Davis H, Turpin E (eds) Art in the Anthropocene: encounters among aesthetics, politics, environments and epistemologies. Open Humanities Press, London, pp 327–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith CE (2007) Design for the Other 90%. New York, NY: Cooper Hewitt, Smithsonian Design Museum

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffen W, Sanderson A, Tyson PD et al (2004) Global change and the earth system: a planet under pressure. The IGBP Book Series. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 336 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Taboada MB, Rojas-Lizana S, Dutra LXC, Levu AVM (2020) Decolonial design in practice: designing meaningful and transformative science communications for Navakavu, Fiji. Des Cult 12(2):141–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Teli M (2015) Computing and the common. Hints of a new utopia in participatory design. Aarhus Ser Hum Cent Comput 1(1):17–20. https://doi.org/10.7146/aahcc.v1i1.21318

  • Teli M, Foth M, Sciannamblo M, Anastasiu I, Lyle P (2020) Tales of institutioning and commoning. Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020 - Participation(S) Otherwise—Volume 1, pp 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1145/3385010.3385020

  • Thorpe A (2010) Design’s role in sustainable consumption. Des Issues 26:3–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tlostanova MV (2017) Postcolonialism and postsocialism in fiction and art: resistance and re-existence. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tonkinwise C (2015) Design for transitions—from and to what? Des Philos Pap 13(1):85–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Tromp N, Hekkert P, Verbeek P-P (2011) Design for socially responsible behavior: a classification of influence based on intended user experience. Des Issues 27(3):3–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tunstall E (2013) Decolonizing design innovation: design anthropology critical anthropology, and indigenous knowledge. In: W. Gunn W, Otto T, Smith R (eds) Design anthropology. Theory and practice. Bloomsbury, London, pp 232–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Vial S (2010) Court traité du Design. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris cedex 14

    Google Scholar 

  • Williston B (2015) The Anthropocene project. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy

    Safouan Azouzi & Loredana Di Lucchio

Authors
  1. Safouan Azouzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Loredana Di Lucchio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Safouan Azouzi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department Architecture & Industrial Design, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Aversa, Italy

    Claudio Gambardella

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Azouzi, S., Di Lucchio, L. (2024). Design After the Anthropocene. In: Gambardella, C. (eds) For Nature/With Nature: New Sustainable Design Scenarios. Springer Series in Design and Innovation , vol 38. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53122-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53122-4_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-53121-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-53122-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation