Skip to main content

Methodological Considerations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Language and Dialect Death
  • 27 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter focuses on methodology, presenting two studies which explicitly address the research questions presented in Chapter 1, and outlines the methodology employed in the empirical analysis of variation and change in Gascon. The chapter outlines the phonological and phonetic variables that will constitute the focus of the analyses, as well as information pertaining to data collection (fieldwork site selection, informant sampling, corpus construction) and data analysis (acoustic phonetic techniques, auditory coding, statistical analysis). The language and dialect death studies are both sociophonetic in nature, involving primarily an acoustic phonetic analysis with rigorous adherence both to analytic best practices and to a Labovian variationist sociolinguistic research methodology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adank, Patti M., Roel Smits, and Roeland van Hout. 2004. A comparison of vowel normalisation procedures for language variation research. Journals of the Acoustical Society of America 116: 3099–3107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, George D. 1978. Vowel duration measurement: A reliability study. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 63: 1176–1185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, Douglas, and Deepayan Sarkar. 2008. lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. http://cran.r-project.org/.

  • Boersma, Paul. 2001. Praat: A system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International 5: 341–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boersma, Paul, and David Weenink. 2012. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. http://www.praat.org/.

  • Chen, Yiya. 2008. The acoustic realisation of vowels of Shanghai Chinese. Journal of Phonetics 36: 629–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, Taehong, and Peter Ladefoged. 1999. Variations and universals in VOT: Evidence from 18 languages. Jphon 27: 207–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cieri, Christopher. 2011. Making a field recording. In Sociophonetics: A student’s guide, ed. Marianna Di Paolo and Malcah Yaeger-Dror, 24–35. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clopper, Cynthia G. 2011. Checking for reliability. In Sociophonetics: A student’s guide, ed. Marianna Di Paolo and Malcah Yaeger-Dror, 188–197. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Paolo, Marianna, and Malcah Yaeger-Dror. 2011. Field methods: Gathering data, creating a corpus, and reporting your work. In Sociophonetics: A student’s guide, ed. Marianna Di Paolo and Malcah Yaeger-Dror, 7–23. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Paolo, Marianna, Malcah Yaeger-Dror, and Alicia Beckford Wassink. 2011. Analyzing vowels. In Sociophonetics: A student’s guide, ed. Marianna Di Paolo and Malcah Yaeger-Dror, 87–106. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabricius, Anne H., Dominic Watt, and Daniel E. Johnson. 2009. A comparison of three speaker-intrinsic vowel formant frequency normalisation algorithms for sociophonetics. Language Variation and Change 21: 413–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fant, Gunnar. 1960. Acoustic theory of speech production. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, Nicholas. 2011. Comparing vowel formant normalisation procedures. York Working Papers in Linguistics 11: 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foulkes, Paul, Gerard Docherty, and Mark J. Jones. 2011. Analyzing stops. In Sociophonetics: A student’s guide, ed. Marianna Di Paolo and Malcah Yaeger-Dror, 58–71. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Daniel E. 2008. Rbrul. http://www.ling.upenn.edu/~johnson4/Rbrul.R.

  • Johnson, Daniel E. 2009. Getting off the Goldvarb standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed-effects variable rule analysis. Language and Linguistics Compass 3: 359–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klatt, Dennis H. 1975. Voice onset time, frication and aspiration in word-initial consonant clusters. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 18: 686–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, Elenor, Jane Stuart-Smith, James M. Scobbie, Malcah Yaegar-Dror, and Margaret Maclagan. 2011. Liquids. In Sociophonetics: A student’s guide, ed. Marianna Di Paolo and Malcah Yaeger-Dror, 72–86. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Llamas, Carmen, Dominic Watt, and Daniel E. Johnson. 2009. Linguistic accommodation and salience of national identity markers in a border town. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 28: 381–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobanov, Boris M. 1971. Classification of Russian vowels spoken by different speakers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 49: 606–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milroy, Lesley, and Matthew Gordon. 2003. Sociolinguistics: Method and interpretation. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mooney, Damien, and James Hawkey. 2019. The variable palatal lateral in Occitan and Catalan: Linguistic transfer or regular sound change? Journal of French Language Studies 29: 281–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nearey, Terrance M. 1977. Phonetic feature systems for vowels. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Alberta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosner, Brian S., and Brian Pickering. 1994. Vowel perception and production. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Séguy, Jean, and Jacques Allières 1954–1973. Atlas linguistique et ethnographique de la Gascogne. Paris: CNRS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tagliamonte, Sally, and R. Harold Baayen. 2012. Models, forests and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice. Language Variation and Change 24: 135–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Jill. 1996. Sound evidence: Speech communities and social accents in Aix-en-Provence. Bern: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt, Dominic, and Anne Fabricius. 2002. Evaluation of a technique for improving the mapping of multiple speakers’ vowel spaces in the F1~F2 plane. Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics 9: 159–173.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Damien Mooney .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mooney, D. (2023). Methodological Considerations. In: Language and Dialect Death. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51101-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51101-1_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-51100-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-51101-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics