Skip to main content

Algebraic Formulations and Geometric Interpretations of Decision-Theoretic Rough Sets

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Rough Sets (IJCRS 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 14481))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 183 Accesses

Abstract

Decision-theoretic rough sets (DTRS) are a probabilistic generalization of rough sets based on Bayesian decision theory. Existing studies on DTRS mainly focus on algebraic approaches. They investigate the formal properties of cost functions of three actions (i.e., assigning an object to the positive, boundary, or negative regions) and the procedure for determining a pair of thresholds by minimizing the overall cost of a rough-set based three-way classification. The objective of this paper is to propose a new direction of research towards the visualization of DTRS. As a complement and an alternative to algebraic approaches, we examine geometric interpretations of DTRS. The geometric approaches are intuitively appealing, easy-to-grasp, and easy-to-use. By looking at visual representations of the various costs, the thresholds, and the geometric relationships between the costs and thresholds, we gain new insights into, and a deeper understanding of, DTRS. Geometric approaches can help practitioners use and apply quickly and effectively DTRS. Combining algebraic approaches and geometric approaches is instrumental in pursuing future research on DTRS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abdullah, S., Al-Shomrani, M.M., Liu, P., Ahmad, S.: A new approach to three-way decisions making based on fractional fuzzy decision theoretical rough set. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 37, 2428–2457 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Deng, J., Zhan, J., Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera, F.: Regret theory-based three-way decision method on incomplete multi-scale decision information systems with interval fuzzy-numbers. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 31, 982–996 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Duan, J., Wang, G., Hu, X., Xia, D., Wu, D.: Mining multigranularity decision rules of concept cognition for knowledge graphs based on three-way decision. Inf. Process. Manage. 60, 103365 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Duda, R.O., Hart, R.O.: Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis. Wiley, New York (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gold, J.I., Stocker, A.A.: Visual decision-making in an uncertain and dynamic world. Annu. Rev. Vision Sci. 3, 227–250 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kril, D.N., Brodhead, M.T., Moorehouse, A.G.: Further evaluation of a decision-making algorithm supporting visual analysis of time-series data. Behav. Interv. 37, 1030–1042 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li, W., Yang, B.: Three-way decisions with fuzzy probabilistic covering-based rough sets and their applications in credit evaluation. Appl. Soft Comput. 136, 110–144 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Liang, D., Pedrycz, W., Liu, D.: Determining three-way decisions with decision-theoretic rough sets using a relative value approach. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern.: Syst. 47, 1785–1799 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu, F., Liu, Y., Abdullah, S.: Three-way decisions with decision-theoretic rough sets based on covering-based Q-rung orthopair fuzzy rough set model. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 40, 9765–9785 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Muntwiler, C., Eppler, M.J.: Improving decision making through visual knowledge calibration. Manag. Decis. 61, 2374–2390 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Padilla, L.M., Creem-Regehr, S.H., Hegarty, M., Stefanucci, J.K.: Decision making with visualizations: a cognitive framework across disciplines. Cogn. Res.: Principles Implicat. 3, 1–25 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pawlak, Z.: Rough sets. Int. J. Comput. Inf. Sci. 11, 341–356 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pawlak, Z.: Rough Sets: Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning About Data. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1991)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Qian, J., Liu, C., Yue, X.: Multigranulation sequential three-way decisions based on multiple thresholds. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 105, 396–416 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Smith, J., Legg, P., Matovic, M., Kinsey, K.: Predicting user confidence during visual decision making. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. (TiiS) 8, 1–30 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sridhar, V.H., et al.: The geometry of decision-making in individuals and collectives. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 118, e2102157118 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sun, T., Mei, X., Sun, X., Cai, Y., Ji, Y., Fan, Z.: Real-time monitoring and control of the breakthrough stage in ultrafast laser drilling based on sequential three-way decision. IEEE Trans. Industr. Inf. 19, 5422–5432 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Xu, J., Miao, D., Zhang, Y.: Piece-wise delay cost-sensitive three-way decisions (in Chinese). J. Softw. 33, 3754–3775 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Xu, J., Zhang, Y., Miao, D.: Three-way confusion matrix for classification: a measure driven view. Inf. Sci. 507, 772–794 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Yang, J.L., Yao, Y.Y.: Granular rough sets and granular shadowed sets: three-way approximations in Pawlak approximation spaces. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 142, 231–247 (2022)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Yao, Y.: Three-way decision: an interpretation of rules in rough set theory. In: Wen, P., Li, Y., Polkowski, L., Yao, Y., Tsumoto, S., Wang, G. (eds.) RSKT 2009. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5589, pp. 642–649. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02962-2_81

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Yao, Y.Y.: Three-way decisions with probabilistic rough sets. Inf. Sci. 180, 341–353 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Yao, Y.Y.: The superiority of three-way decisions in probabilistic rough set models. Inf. Sci. 181, 1080–1096 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Yao, Y.Y.: Three-way decision and granular computing. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 103, 107–123 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yao, Y.Y.: Three-way granular computing, rough sets, and formal concept analysis. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 116, 106–125 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Yao, Y.Y.: The geometry of three-way decision. Appl. Intell. 51, 6298–6325 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yao, Y.Y.: Symbols-meaning-value (SMV) space as a basis for a conceptual model of data science. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 144, 113–128 (2022)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Yao, Y.Y., Wong, S.K.M.: A decision theoretic framework for approximating concepts. Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 37, 793–809 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yao, Y.Y., Wong, S.K.M., Lingras, P.: A decision-theoretic rough set model. In: Ras, Z.W., Zemankova, M., Emrich, M.L. (eds.) Methodologies for Intelligent Systems, vol. 5, pp. 17–24. North-Holland, New York (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Yao, Y.Y., Yang, J.L.: Granular fuzzy sets and three-way approximations of fuzzy sets. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 161, 109003 (2023)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang, Q., Xie, Q., Wang, G.: A novel three-way decision model with decision-theoretic rough sets using utility theory. Knowl.-Based Syst. 159, 321–335 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhao, X.R., Hu, B.Q.: Three-way decisions with decision-theoretic rough sets in multiset-valued information tables. Inf. Sci. 507, 684–699 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by a Discovery Grant from NSERC, Canada, and National Natural Science Foundations of China (Grant No. 62266032), China Scholarship Council (Grant No. 202006825060), Jiangxi Natural Science Foundations (Grant No. 20202BAB202018), Jiangxi Training Program for Academic and Technical Leaders in Major Disciplines-Leading Talents Project (Grant No. 20225BCI22016).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianfeng Xu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Xu, J., Miao, D., Zhang, L., Yao, Y. (2023). Algebraic Formulations and Geometric Interpretations of Decision-Theoretic Rough Sets. In: Campagner, A., Urs Lenz, O., Xia, S., Ślęzak, D., Wąs, J., Yao, J. (eds) Rough Sets. IJCRS 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 14481. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50959-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50959-9_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-50958-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-50959-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics