Skip to main content

Two-Sorted Modal Logic for Formal and Rough Concepts

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Rough Sets (IJCRS 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 14481))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 173 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper, we propose two-sorted modal logics for the representation and reasoning of concepts arising from rough set theory (RST) and formal concept analysis (FCA). These logics are interpreted in two-sorted bidirectional frames, which are essentially formal contexts with converse relations. The logic \({\textbf {KB}}\) contains ordinary necessity and possibility modalities and can represent rough set-based concepts. On the other hand, the logic \({\textbf {KF}}\) has window modality that can represent formal concepts. We study the relationship between KB and KF by proving a correspondence theorem. It is then shown that, using the formulae with modal operators in KB and KF, we can capture formal concepts based on RST and FCA and their lattice structures.

This work is partially supported by National Science and Technology Council (NSTC) of Taiwan under Grant No. 110-2221-E-001-022-MY3.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Balbiani, P.: Deciding the word problem in pure double Boolean algebras. J. Appl. Log. 10(3), 260–273 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Blackburn, P., De Rijke, M., Venema, Y.: Modal Logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Conradie, W., et al.: Rough concepts. Inf. Sci. 561, 371–413 (2021)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Düntsch, I., Gediga, G.: Modal-style operators in qualitative data analysis. In: Vipin, K., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, pp. 155–162. IEEE Computer Society (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ganter, B., Meschke, C.: A formal concept analysis approach to rough data tables. In: Peters, J.F., et al. (eds.) Transactions on Rough Sets XIV. LNCS, vol. 6600, pp. 37–61. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21563-6_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Gargov, G., Passy, S., Tinchev, T.: Modal environment for Boolean speculations. In: Skordev, D.G. (eds) Mathematical Logic and Its Applications, pp. 253–263, Springer, Boston (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0897-3_17

  7. Howlader, P., Banerjee, M.: Kripke contexts, double Boolean algebras with operators and corresponding modal systems. J. Logic Lang. Inform. 32, 117–146 (2023)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Howlader, P., Banerjee, M.: A non-distributive logic for semiconcepts and its modal extension with semantics based on Kripke contexts. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 153, 115–143 (2023)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Howlader, P., Banerjee, M.: Topological representation of double Boolean algebras. Algebra Univer. 84, Paper No. 15, 32 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hu, K., Sui, Y., Lu, Y., Wang, J., Shi, C.: Concept approximation in concept lattice. In: Cheung, D., Williams, G.J., Li, Q. (eds.) PAKDD 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2035, pp. 167–173. Springer, Heidelberg (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45357-1_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Kent, R.E.: Rough concept analysis. In: Ziarko, W.P. (ed.) Rough Sets. Fuzzy Sets and Knowledge Discovery, pp. 248–255. Springer, London (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3238-7_30

  12. Leuştean, L., Moangă, N., Şerbănuţă, T.F.: A many-sorted polyadic modal logic. Fund. Inform. 173(2–3), 191–215 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Meschke, C.: Approximations in concept lattices. In: Kwuida, L., Sertkaya, B. (eds.) ICFCA 2010. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5986, pp. 104–123. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11928-6_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Pawlak, Z.: Rough sets. Int. J. Comput. Inform. Sci. 11(5), 341–356 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Saquer, J., Deogun, J.S.: Concept approximations based on rough sets and similarity measures. Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci. 11(3), 655–674 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vormbrock, B., Wille, R.: Semiconcept and protoconcept algebras: the basic theorems. In: Ganter, B., Stumme, G., Wille, R. (eds.) Formal Concept Analysis. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3626, pp. 34–48. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11528784_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Wille, R.: Restructuring lattice theory: an approach based on hierarchies of concepts. In: Ferré, S., Rudolph, S. (eds.) ICFCA 2009. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5548, pp. 314–339. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01815-2_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Wille, R.: Boolean concept logic. In: Ganter, B., Mineau, G.W. (eds.) ICCS-ConceptStruct 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1867, pp. 317–331. Springer, Heidelberg (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/10722280_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Yao, Y.: A comparative study of formal concept analysis and rough set theory in data analysis. In: Tsumoto, S., Słowiński, R., Komorowski, J., Grzymała-Busse, J.W. (eds.) RSCTC 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3066, pp. 59–68. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25929-9_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Yao, Y.Y.: Concept lattices in rough set theory. In: IEEE Annual Meeting of the Fuzzy Information Processing Society-NAFIPS, vol. 2, pp. 796–801. IEEE (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yao, Y.Y., Chen, Y.: Rough set approximations in formal concept analysis. In: Peters, J.F., et al. (eds.) Transactions on Rough Sets V, pp. 285–305. Springer, Berlin (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yao, Y.Y., Lin, T.Y.: Generalization of rough sets using modal logics. Intell. Autom. Soft Comput. 2(2), 103–119 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prosenjit Howlader .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Howlader, P., Liau, CJ. (2023). Two-Sorted Modal Logic for Formal and Rough Concepts. In: Campagner, A., Urs Lenz, O., Xia, S., Ślęzak, D., Wąs, J., Yao, J. (eds) Rough Sets. IJCRS 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 14481. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50959-9_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50959-9_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-50958-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-50959-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics