Abstract
Multiple levels of classification naturally occur in many domains. Several multi-level modeling approaches account for this and a subset of them attempt to provide their users with sanity-checking mechanisms in order to guard them against conceptually ill-formed models. Historically, the respective multi-level well-formedness schemes have either been overly restrictive or too lax. Orthogonal Ontological Classification has been proposed as a foundation that combines the selectivity of strict schemes with the flexibility afforded by laxer schemes. In this paper, we present a formalization of Orthogonal Ontological Classification, which we empirically validated to demonstrate some of its hitherto only postulated claims using an implementation in ConceptBase. We discuss both the formalization and the implementation, and report on the limitations we encountered.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abiteboul, S., Hull, R.: Data functions, datalog and negation. SIGMOD Rec. 17(3), 143–153 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1145/971701.50218
Almeida, J.P.A., Fonseca, C.M., Carvalho, V.A.: A comprehensive formal theory for multi-level conceptual modeling. In: Mayr, H.C., Guizzardi, G., Ma, H., Pastor, O. (eds.) ER 2017. LNCS, vol. 10650, pp. 280–294. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69904-2_23
Atkinson, C.: Meta-modeling for distributed object environments. In: Enterprise Distributed Object Computing, pp. 90–101. IEEE (1997)
Atkinson, C., Gerbig, R.: Melanie: Multi-level modeling and ontology engineering environment. In: Proceedings of Modeling Wizards 2012. ACM (2012)
Atkinson, C., Kühne, T.: The essence of multilevel metamodeling. In: Gogolla, M., Kobryn, C. (eds.) UML 2001. LNCS, vol. 2185, pp. 19–33. Springer, Heidelberg (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45441-1_3
Atkinson, C., Kühne, T.: Rearchitecting the UML infrastructure. ACM Trans. Model. Comput. Simul. 12(4), 290–321 (2003)
Atkinson, C., Kühne, T.: Concepts for comparing modeling tool architectures. In: Briand, L., Williams, C. (eds.) MODELS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3713, pp. 398–413. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11557432_30
Atkinson, C., Kühne, T.: Reducing accidental complexity in domain models. Softw. Syst. Model. 7(3), 345–359 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-007-0061-0
Brasileiro, F., Almeida, J.P.A., Carvalho, V.A., Guizzardi, G.: Applying a multi-level modeling theory to assess taxonomic hierarchies in Wikidata. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web, pp. 975–980. WWW ’16 Companion, International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2872518.2891117
Dadalto, A.A., Almeida, J.P.A., Fonseca, C.M., Guizzardi, G.: Type or individual? evidence of large-scale conceptual disarray in Wikidata. In: Ghose, A., Horkoff, J., Silva Souza, V.E., Parsons, J., Evermann, J. (eds.) ER 2021. LNCS, vol. 13011, pp. 367–377. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89022-3_29
Fonseca, C.M., Almeida, J.P.A., Guizzardi, G., Carvalho, V.A.: Multi-level conceptual modeling: from a formal theory to a well-founded language. In: Trujillo, J.C., et al. (eds.) ER 2018. LNCS, vol. 11157, pp. 409–423. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00847-5_29
Frank, U.: Multilevel modeling. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 6(6), 319–337 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-014-0350-4
Gitzel, R., Merz, M.: How a relaxation of the strictness definition can benefit MDD approaches with meta model hierarchies. In: Proceedings of the 8\(^{th}\) World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics & Informatics, vol. IV, pp. 62–67 (2004)
Guizzardi, G.: Ontological patterns, anti-patterns and pattern languages for next-generation conceptual modeling. In: Yu, E., Dobbie, G., Jarke, M., Purao, S. (eds.) ER 2014. LNCS, vol. 8824, pp. 13–27. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12206-9_2
Jeusfeld, M.A.: Metamodeling and method engineering with ConceptBase. In: Metamodeling for Method Engineering, pp. 89–168. MIT Press (2009)
Jeusfeld, M.A., Almeida, J.A.P.A., Carvalho, V.A., Fonseca, C.M., Neumayr, B.: Deductive reconstruction of MLT* for multi-level modeling. In: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems: Companion Proceedings. MODELS 2020 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3417990.3421410
Jeusfeld, M.A., Kühne, T.: ConceptBase implementation of MDM. Project Web Site (2023), https://conceptbase.sourceforge.net/mdm-er2023/
Jeusfeld, M.A., Neumayr, B.: DeepTelos: multi-level modeling with most general instances. In: Comyn-Wattiau, I., Tanaka, K., Song, I.-Y., Yamamoto, S., Saeki, M. (eds.) ER 2016. LNCS, vol. 9974, pp. 198–211. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46397-1_15
Koubarakis, M., et al.: A retrospective on Telos as a metamodeling language for requirements engineering. Requirements Eng. 26(1), 1–23 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-020-00329-x
Kühne, T.: Exploring potency. In: ACM/IEEE 21th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MODELS 2018). ACM (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3239372.3239411
Kühne, T.: Multi-dimensional multi-level modeling. Softw. Syst. Model. 21(2), 543–559 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-021-00951-5
Kühne, T., Lange, A.: Melanee and DLM: a contribution to the MULTI collaborative comparison challenge. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems: Companion Proceedings, pp. 434–443. MODELS 2022, ACM, NY, USA (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3550356.3561571
Lange, A., Atkinson, C.: Multi-level modeling with LML – a contribution to the multi-level process challenge. Int. J. Conceptual Model. 17, 6–1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.18417/emisa.17.6. special Issue: Multi-Level Process Challenge
de Lara, J., Guerra, E., Cobos, R., Moreno-Llorena, J.: Extending deep meta-modelling for practical model-driven engineering. Comput. J. 57(1), 36–58 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/bxs144
Mylopoulos, J., Borgida, A., Jarke, M., Koubarakis, M.: Telos: representing knowledge about information systems. Inf. Syst. 8(4), 325–362 (1990)
Neumayr, B., Jeusfeld, M.A., Schrefl, M., Schütz, C.: Dual deep instantiation and its conceptbase implementation. In: Jarke, M., et al. (eds.) CAiSE 2014. LNCS, vol. 8484, pp. 503–517. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07881-6_34
Partridge, C., de Cesare, S., Mitchell, A., Odell, J.: Formalization of the classification pattern: survey of classification modeling in information systems engineering. Softw. Syst. Model. 17(1), 167–203 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-016-0521-5
Partridge, C., et al.: Implicit requirements for ontological multi-level types in the uniclass classification. In: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems: Companion Proceedings. MODELS 2020 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3417990.3421414
Pirotte, A., Zimányi, E., Massart, D., Yakusheva, T.: Materialization: a powerful and ubiquitous abstraction pattern. In: Proceedings of the 20\(^{th}\) International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB 1994), pp. 630–641. Morgan Kaufman (1994)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kühne, T., Jeusfeld, M.A. (2023). Sanity-Checking Multiple Levels of Classification. In: Almeida, J.P.A., Borbinha, J., Guizzardi, G., Link, S., Zdravkovic, J. (eds) Conceptual Modeling. ER 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14320. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47262-6_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47262-6_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-47261-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-47262-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)