Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Second Language Learning and Teaching ((SLLT))

  • 52 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter of the book is devoted to a discussion of the results, collected according to the research blueprint outlined in the previous chapter. The data were gathered with both quantitative and qualitative methods and then analysed to present how the traits openness to experience and ambiguity tolerance are related to the forms of attainment (self-assessment and grades). All the findings are interpreted to show profiles of students with different levels of openness to experience and ambiguity tolerance. At the end of the chapter, the limitations of the study are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alibakhshi, G., & Sharakipour, H. (2014). The effect of self-assessment on EFL learners’ receptive skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 39(1), 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrade, H., & Valtcheva, A. (2009). Promoting learning and achievement through self-assessment. Theory into Practice, 48(1), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802577544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babaei, A., Maktabi, G., Behrozi, N., & Atashafroz, A. (2016). The impact of successful intelligence on students’ critical thinking and tolerance of ambiguity. Fundamentals of Mental Health, 18, 379–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basak, H. (2019). Self-assessment of students’ speaking skills. Middle East Technical University. http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12623025/index.pdf

  • Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22(2), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/713695728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, A., & Joyce, H. (1997). Focus on speaking. National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Y. G., & Lee, J. (2010). The effects of self-assessment among young learners of English. Language Testing. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209346370

  • Chapple, C. (1983). The relationship between ambiguity tolerance and success in acquiring English as a second language in adult learners [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewaele, J. -M., & Ip, T. S. (2013). The link between foreign language classroom anxiety, second language tolerance of ambiguity and self-rated English proficiency among Chinese learners. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 3(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2013.3.1.3

  • Dlaska, A., & Krekeler, C. (2008). Self-assessment of pronunciation. System: An International Journal of Educational Technology and Applied Linguistics, 36(4), 506–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.03.003

  • Ehrman, M. (1996). Understanding second language learning difficulties. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452243436

  • El-Koumy, A. S. A. (2003). Differences in FL reading comprehension among high-, middle-, and low-ambiguity tolerance students. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2365143

  • Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ely, C. M. (1995). Tolerance of ambiguity and the teaching of ESL. In J. M. Reid (Ed.), Learning styles in the ESL/EFL classroom (pp. 87–95). Heinle & Heinle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erten, İH., & Topkaya, E. Z. (2009). Understanding tolerance of ambiguity of EFL learners in reading classes at tertiary level. Novitas-ROYAL, 3(1), 29–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahimi, Z., & Rahimi, A. (2015). On the impact of self-assessment practice on writing skill. Procedia–Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192, 730–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felson, R. B. (1981). Ambiguity and bias in the self-concept. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44, 64–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, P.P.-H., & Kang, H.-S. (2010). Attribution and self-efficacy and their interrelationship in the Korean EFL context. Language Learning, 60(3), 606–627. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00570.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krashen, S. D., & Terrell, T. D. (2000). The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom. Longman/Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laidra, K., Pullmann, H., & Allik, J. (2007). Personality and intelligence as predictors of academic achievement: A cross-sectional study from elementary to secondary school. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(3), 441–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.08.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leger, K. A., Charles, S. T., Turiano, N. A., & Almeida, D. M. (2016). Personality and stressor-related affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(6), 917–928. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liepa, D. (2011). Self-assessment criteria of integrated foreign language acquisition. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 29, 89–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1985a). Comparison of EPI and psychoticism scales with measures of the five-factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 6(5), 587–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(85)90008-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1985b). Openness to experience. In Perspectives in personality (Vol. 1, pp. 145–172). R. Hogan & W. H. Jones.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J., Fleckenstein, J., Retelsdorf, J., & Köller, O. (2019). The relationship of personality traits and different measures of domain-specific achievement in upper secondary education. Learning and Individual Differences, 69, 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ożańska-Ponikwia, K., & Dewaele, J.-M. (2012). Personality and L2 use: The advantage of being openminded and self-confident in an immigration context. EUROSLA Yearbook, 12, 112–134. https://doi.org/10.1075/eurosla.12.07oza

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F., Britner, S. L., & Valiante, G. (2000). Relation between achievement goals and self-beliefs of middle school students in writing and science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(4), 406–422. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paramartha, A. A. G. Y. (2016). Exploring the role of self-efficacy in the implementation of self-assessment for English writing. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 5(1), 790–802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patri, M. (2002). The influence of peer feedback on self- and peer-assessment of oral skills. Language Testing, 19(2), 109–131. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532202lt224oa

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piechurska-Kuciel, E. (2018a). Openness to experience as a predictor of L2 WTC. System, 72, 190–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piechurska-Kuciel, E. (2018b). The influence of ambiguity tolerance on willingness to communicate in L2. In M. Pawlak, & A. Mystkowska-Wiertelak, Challenges of second and foreign language education in a globalized world (pp. 167–184). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, J., & Duran, P. (2014). Developing and evaluating self-assessment reading competence descriptors for the European Language Portfolio. Porta Linguarum, 22, 127–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulatova, Z. A. (2018). Improving classroom atmosphere in English lessons. Philology, 16(4), 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard, J. C. (2004). Second language writing. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/lt/cambridgeenglish/catalog/teacher-training-development-and-research

  • Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching: A description and analysis. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, J. (1975). What the “good language learner” can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scrivener, J. (2010). Learning teaching. Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sękowski, A. E., & Rudź, M. (2011). Charakterystyka osobowości i stylów poznawczych osób uzdolnionych językowo. Języki Obce w Szkole, 1, 37–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoycheva, K. (2003a). Ambiguity tolerance and creativity: Intersection points. Journal of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 2, 18–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoycheva, K. (2003b). Talent, science and education: How do we cope with uncertainty and ambiguities. In P. Csermely & L. Lederman (Eds.), Science education: Talent recruitment and public uderstanding (pp. 31–43). IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tauroza, S., & Allison, D. (1994). Expectation-driven understanding in information systems lecture comprehension. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic listening: Research perspectives (pp. 35–54). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tse, L. (2000). Student perceptions of foreign language study: A qualitative analysis of foreign language autobiographies. The Modern Language Journal, 84(1), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wędzińska, M. (2020). Preferencje wartości uczniów szkół ponadgimnazjalnych—Próba charakterystyki. Rocznik Towarzystwa Naukowego Płockiego, 12, 347–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zenasni, F., Besancon, M., & Lubart, T. (2008). Tolerance for ambiguity and creativity: An empirical study. Journal of Creative Behavior, 42(1), 61–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brygida Lika .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lika, B. (2023). Discussion. In: The Impact of Openness and Ambiguity Tolerance on Learning English as a Foreign Language. Second Language Learning and Teaching. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45940-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45940-5_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-45939-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-45940-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics