Skip to main content

“To Keep Industry Alive”: Hume on Freer International Trade as Moral Improvement

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
British Modern International Thought in the Making

Part of the book series: International Political Theory ((IPoT))

  • 37 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, Erik W. Matson describes how Hume’s international theory derives from his understanding of commerce and international trade as sources of moral improvement. Drawing on Hume's ideas of technical progress and innovation, Hume’s writings are shown to convey a nascent theory of comparative advantage.Trade benefitstrich and poor countries alike, facilitating a process of mutual emulation and development. International trade, moreover, contributes in Hume's view to cultural enhancement through its effects on socialization and the consequent extensions of individual sympathy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Abbreviations to some of Hume’s works: References to A Treatise of Human Nature are to Hume (2007), abbreviated as T, followed by book, part, section, and paragraph. References to An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals are to Hume (1998), abbreviated as EMP and followed by section, part [where one exists], and paragraph. References to the Essays, Moral, Political, and Literary or the Essays are to Hume (1994), abbreviated as EMPL, and followed by page.

  2. 2.

    In 1774, in his Sketches of the History of Man, Kames seems to build from the Hume-Tucker exchange, taking issue with Tucker’s arguments: “It appears the intention of Providence that all nations should benefit by commerce as by sun-shine, and so it is ordered, that an unequal balance [of trade] is prejudicial to the gainer as well as to the losers.” The balance is initially a disadvantage to the poor country (the loser), but eventually the rich country engrosses itself, “making an overgrown commerce the means of its own destruction” (Kames 2007/1774: 1, 86–87).

Bibliography

  • Asher, Kendra H. 2020. Moderation and the Liberal State: David Hume’s History of England. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2020.08.027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aspromourgos, Tony. 2010. “Universal Opulence”: Adam Smith on Technical Progress and Real Wages. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 17 (5): 1169–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, Jeremy. 1843. The Works of Jeremy Bentham, vol. 1, ed. John Bowring. Edinburgh: William Tait.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berdell, John F. 1995. Innovation and Trade: David Hume and the Case for Freer Trade. History of Political Economy 28 (1): 108–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, Christopher J. 1994. The Idea of Luxury: A Conceptual and Historical Investigation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Box, M.A. 1990. The Suasive Art of David Hume. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, Richard. 2008. Manners and Morals: David Hume on Civility, Commerce, and the Social Construction of Difference. In David Hume’s Political Economy, ed. Margaret Schabas and Carl Wennerlind, 65–85. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, John Hill. 1846. The Life and Correspondence of David Hume, 2 vols., vol. 1. Edinburgh: William Tait.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavallar, Georg. 2011. Imperfect Cosmopolis: Studies in the History of International Legal Theory and Cosmopolitan Ideas. Chippenham, Wiltshire: University of Wales Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deringer, William. 2017. “It Was Their Business to Know”: British Merchants and Mercantile Epistemology in the Eighteenth Century. History of Political Economy 49 (2): 177–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finlay, Christopher J. 2007. Hume’s Social Philosophy: Human Nature and Commercial Sociability in A Treatise of Human Nature. London and New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, Duncan. 1975. Hume’s Philosophical Politics. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman-Barzilai, Fonna. 2010. Adam Smith and the Circles of Sympathy: Cosmopolitanism and Moral Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley, Ryan Patrick. 2019. Our Great Purpose: Adam Smith on Living a Better Life. Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, James A. 2015. Hume: An Intellectual Biography. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hont, Istvan. 2005. Jealousy of Trade: International Competition and the Nation-State in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, MA, and London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. The Rich Country-Poor Country Debate Revisited: The Irish Origins and French Reception of the Hume Paradox. In David Hume’s Political Economy, ed. Margaret Schabas and Carl Wennerlind, 243–323. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, David. 1983. The History of England from the Invasion of Julius Caesar to the Revolution in 1688, 6 vols, ed. W.B. Todd. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1994. Essays, Moral, Political, and Literary, ed. Eugene F. Miller. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998. An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals, ed. Tom L. Beauchamp. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, ed. Tom L. Beauchamp. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. A Treatise of Human Nature, 2 vols., ed. David F. Norton and Mary J. Norton. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. Writings on Economics, ed. Eugene Rotwein. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kames, Henry Home. 2007. Sketches of the History of Man, 3 vols., vol. 1, ed. James A. Harris. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp Smith, Norman. 2005. The Philosophy of David Hume: A Critical Study of Its Origins and Central Doctrines, 2nd ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingston, Donald W. 1988. David Hume: Ambassador from the World of Learning to the World of Conversation. The Political Science Reviewer 18: 35–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, J.M. 1952. An Eighteenth Century Controversy in the Theory of Economic Progress. The Manchester School 20 (3): 311–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matson, Erik W. 2019. Reason and Political Economy in Hume. Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 12 (1): 26–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2021a. A Dialectical Reading of Adam Smith on Wealth and Happiness. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 184: 826–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2021b. Satisfaction in Action: Hume’s Endogenous Theory of Preferences and the Virtues of Commerce. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 183: 849–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2022. The Edifying Discourse of Adam Smith: Focalism, Commerce, and Serving the Common Good. Journal of the History of Economic Thought. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1053837221000353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McArthur, Neil. 2007. David Hume’s Political Theory: Law, Commerce, and the Constitution of Government. Toronto: Toronto University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Cosmopolitanism and Hume’s General Point of View. European Journal of Political Theory 13 (3): 321–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, Thomas W. 2015. Hume’s Socratism. The Review of Politics 77: 23–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller, Jerry Z. 1993. Adam Smith in His Time and Ours: Designing the Decent Society. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paganelli, Maria Pia. 2006. Hume and Endogenous Money. Eastern Economic Journal 32 (3): 533–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. David Hume on Banking and Hoarding. Southern Economic Journal 80 (4): 968–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perlman, Morris. 1987. Of a Controversial Passage in Hume. Journal of Political Economy 95 (2): 274–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillipson, Nicholas. 1979. Hume as Moralist: A Social Historian’s Perspective. In Philosophers of the Enlightenment, ed. S.C. Brown, 140–161. Brighton: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1981. The Scottish Enlightenment. In The Enlightenment in National Context, ed. Roy Porter and Mikulas Teich, 19–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1983. Adam Smith as Civic Moralist. In Wealth and Virtue: The Shaping of Political Economy in the Scottish Enlightenment, ed. Istvan Hont and Michael Ignatieff, 179–202. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pocock, J.G.A. 1985. Hume and the American Revolution: The Dying Thoughts of a North Briton. In Virtue, Commerce, and History: Essays on Political Thought and History, Chiefly in the Eighteenth Century, 125–141. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, Dennis C. 2006. Does “Bettering Our Condition” Really Make Us Better Off? Adam Smith on Progress and Happiness. The American Political Science Review 100 (3): 308–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, G.B. 1975. Adam Smith on Competition and Increasing Returns. In Essays on Adam Smith, ed. Andrew S. Skinner and Thomas Wilson, 350–360. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, John. 2005. The Case for the Enlightenment: Scotland and Naples 1680–1760. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rotwein, Eugene. 2009. Introduction. In Writings on Economics, ed. David Hume and Eugene Rotwein, xxv–cxi. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayre-McCord, Geoffrey. 2013. Hume and Smith on Sympathy, Approbation, and Moral Judgment. Social Philosophy and Policy 30: 208–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schabas, Margaret, and Carl Wennerlind. 2020. A Philosopher’s Economist: Hume and the Rise of Capitalism. Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, Reinhard. 2016. Adam Smith and the “Rich Country-Poor Country” Debate: Eighteenth-Century Views on Economic Progress and International Trade. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 23 (5): 764–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sekora, John. 1977. Luxury: The Concept in Western Thought, Eden to Smollet. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semmel, Bernard. 1965. The Hume-Tucker Debate and Pitt’s Trade Proposals. The Economic Journal 75 (300): 759–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Adam. 1981. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, 2 vols., ed. R.H. Campbell and A.S. Skinner. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susato, Ryu. 2006. Hume’s Nuanced Defense of Luxury. Hume Studies 32 (1): 167–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Jacqueline A. 2015. Reflecting Subjects: Passion, Sympathy, and Society in Hume’s Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wennerlind, Carl. 2008. An Artificial Virtue and the Oil of Commerce: A Synthetic View of Hume’s Theory of Money. In David Hume’s Political Economy, ed. Margaret Schabas and Carl Wennerlind, 105–125. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. The Role of Political Economy in Hume’s Moral Philosophy. Hume Studies 37 (1): 43–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank Kendra Asher and Dan Klein for valuable feedback.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erik W. Matson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Matson, E.W. (2024). “To Keep Industry Alive”: Hume on Freer International Trade as Moral Improvement. In: Bourcier, B., Jakonen, M. (eds) British Modern International Thought in the Making. International Political Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45713-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics