Skip to main content

The Mechanism of Student Agency in Self-Formation Through Knowledge Engagement in Higher Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Student Agency and Self-Formation in Higher Education

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Global Higher Education ((PSGHE))

Abstract

Despite the emerging focus on student agency in higher education research, human agency is not limited to college students. However, what is particularly emphasised in higher education is student agency related to active engagement with disciplinary knowledge, which might lead to academically highlighted self-formation. Combining the growing interest in student agency with the call for “bringing knowledge back in” (Young, Bringing knowledge back in: From social constructivism to social realism in the sociology of education. Routledge, 2007; Ashwin, 2021), this chapter aims to understand the mechanism of students’ reflexive agency underlying their academic self-formation. The chapter presents part of findings from an ongoing research project for developing a theory that explains what is self-formation and how students engage in it, particularly with the central role of disciplinary knowledge. The theory development involved both the conceptual research on relevant theories (e.g. college student experience theories, agency theories, self-theories, learning theories, and knowledge theories) as well as the empirical findings from a 15-month ethnographic study of thirteen graduate students. One of the emergent themes that constitutes the theory is regarding the mechanism of how students’ reflexivity works in their academic self-formation. First, this chapter unravels the mediating mechanism underlying students’ active self-reflexivity, which enables their academic self-formation. Second, how students’ reflexivity operates in relation to structural resources will be discussed. Finally, I shall argue that students’ changing reflexivity is attributable to their engagement with disciplinary knowledge by drawing on both data and concepts. The chapter can serve as a conceptual foundation for further investigations of student agency and self-formation through knowledge engagement by operationalising the concepts and providing empirical examples of them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahearn, L. M. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30(1), 109–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M. (1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M. (2003). Structure, agency and the internal conversation. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M. (2007). Making our way through the world: Human reflexivity and social mobility. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M. (2012). The reflexive imperative in late modernity. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ashwin, P. (2020). Transforming university education: A manifesto. Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2018). Toward a psychology of human agency: Pathways and reflections. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 130–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617699280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., Ross, D., & Ross, S. A. (1961). Transmission of aggression through imitation of aggressive models. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63(3), 575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., Ross, D., & Ross, S. A. (1963). Imitation of film-mediated aggressive models. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66(1), 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G., & Tedder, M. (2007). Agency and learning in the lifecourse: Towards an ecological perspective. Studies in the Education of Adults, 39(2), 132–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case, J. M. (2013). Researching student learning in higher education: A social realist approach. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Case, J. M. (2015). A social realist perspective on student learning in higher education: The morphogenesis of agency. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(5), 841–852. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1011095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Case, J. M., & Marshall, D. (2009). Approaches to learning. In The Routledge international handbook of higher education (pp. 9–22). Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? Source: American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023. https://doi.org/10.1086/231294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gecas, V. (1982). The self-concept. Annual Review of Sociology, 8, 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of a theory of structuration. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S. (1991). A review of attribution theory in achievement contexts. Educational Psychology Review, 3(1), 5–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inouye, K., Lee, S., & Oldac, Y. I. (2022). A systematic review of student agency in international higher education. Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00952-3

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (Vol. I). New York: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. Paper presented at the Nebraska symposium on motivation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klemenčič, M. (2015). What is student agency? An ontological exploration in the context of research on student engagement. Student Engagement in Europe: Society, Higher Education and Student Governance, 11, 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kudo, K. (2023). Cosmopolitan agency and meaningful intercultural interactions: an ecological and person-in-context conceptualisation. Studies in Higher Education, 48(2), 329–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D. (2009). What student affairs professionals need to know about student engagement. Journal of College Student Development, 50(6), 683–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. (2021). Researching higher education as students’ academic self-formation (Centre for Global Higher Education working paper series, 76).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Y., Shi, J., & Zhang, C. (2022). Working toward becoming doctoral researchers: A collective autoethnography of international students in Australia. Journal of International Students, 12(S2), 68–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomer, S. (2018). UK policy discourses and international student mobility: The deterrence and subjectification of international students. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 16(3), 308–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2017.1414584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2014). Student self-formation in international education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 18(1), 6–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315313513036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2018). Higher education as self-formation. UCL Institute of Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2023). Higher education as student self-formation. In B. C. Marginson, D. Platonova, & A. Smolentseva (Eds.), assessing the contributions of higher education: Knowledge for a disordered world. Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S., & Sawir, E. (2011). Ideas for intercultural education. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S., Cantwell, B., Platonova, D., & Smolentseva, A. (2023). Assessing the contributions of higher education: Knowledge for a disordered world. Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, B. (2017). “I wouldn’t imagine having to go through all this and still be the same person. No way”: Structure, reflexivity and international students. Journal of Research in International Education, 16(3), 265–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J. A. (2012). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meredith, J. (1993). Theory building through conceptual methods. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 13(5), 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2019). Education at a Glance 2019: OECD Indicators. OECD Publishing. Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/f8d7880d-en

  • Oldac, Y. I. (2022). The contributions of study abroad to home countries: An agential perspective. Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00980-z

  • Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J. B. (1954). Social learning and clinical psychology. Johnson Reprint Corporation.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, A. (1992). Method in social science: A realist approach. Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, A. (1999). Realism and social science. Sage Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, E. A. (1996). A guide to constructs of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(3), 549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review. Higher Education (November), 1–15. Retrieved from http://americandemocracy.illinoisstate.edu/documents/democratic-engagement-white-paper-2_13_09.pdf

  • Vermunt, J. D., & Vermetten, Y. J. (2004). Patterns in student learning: Relationships between learning strategies, conceptions of learning, and learning orientations. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 359–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0005-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (2012). Thought and language. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92(4), 548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (2012). An attribution theory of motivation. Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, 1, 135–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheelahan, L. (2012). Why knowledge matters in curriculum: A social realist argument. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, L. (2022). Student formation in higher education: A comparison and combination of Confucian xiushen (self-cultivation) and Bildung. Higher Education, 83(5), 1163–1180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. (2007). Bringing knowledge back in: From social constructivism to social realism in the sociology of education. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Soyoung Lee .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lee, S. (2023). The Mechanism of Student Agency in Self-Formation Through Knowledge Engagement in Higher Education. In: Oldac, Y.I., Yang, L., Lee, S. (eds) Student Agency and Self-Formation in Higher Education. Palgrave Studies in Global Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44885-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44885-0_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-44884-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-44885-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics