Skip to main content

How Good Are Synthetic Medical Images? An Empirical Study with Lung Ultrasound

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Simulation and Synthesis in Medical Imaging (SASHIMI 2023)

Abstract

Acquiring large quantities of data and annotations is effective for developing high-performing deep learning models, but is difficult and expensive to do in the healthcare context. Adding synthetic training data using generative models offers a low-cost method to deal effectively with the data scarcity challenge, and can also address data imbalance and patient privacy issues. In this study, we propose a comprehensive framework that fits seamlessly into model development workflows for medical image analysis. We demonstrate, with datasets of varying size, (i) the benefits of generative models as a data augmentation method; (ii) how adversarial methods can protect patient privacy via data substitution; (iii) novel performance metrics for these use cases by testing models on real holdout data. We show that training with both synthetic and real data outperforms training with real data alone, and that models trained solely with synthetic data approach their real-only counterparts. Code is available at https://github.com/Global-Health-Labs/US-DCGAN.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bargsten, L., Schlaefer, A.: SpeckleGAN: a generative adversarial network with an adaptive speckle layer to augment limited training data for ultrasound image processing. IJCARS 15, 1427–1436 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bhoil, R., Ahluwalia, A., Chopra, R., Surya, M., Bhoil, S.: Signs and lines in lung ultrasound. J. Ultrason. 21(86), 225–233 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chuquicusma, M.J., et al.: How to fool radiologists with GANs? a visual turing test for lung cancer diagnosis. In: ISBI, pp. 240–244. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Frid-Adar, M., et al.: Synthetic data augmentation using GAN for improved liver lesion classification. In: ISBI, pp. 289–293. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goodfellow, I., et al.: Generative adversarial networks. In: NeurIPS (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Haq, D.Z., Fatichah, C.: Ultrasound image synthetic generating using deep convolution generative adversarial network for breast cancer identification. IPTEK J. Technol. Sci. 34(1), 12 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hu, Y., et al.: Freehand ultrasound image simulation with spatially-conditioned generative adversarial networks. In: Cardoso, M.J., et al. (eds.) CMMI/SWITCH/RAMBO -2017. LNCS, vol. 10555, pp. 105–115. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67564-0_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Koh, H., et al.: Acoustic simulation for transcranial focused ultrasound using GAN-based synthetic CT. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 26(1), 161–171 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Hinton, G.E.: ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Commun. ACM 60(6), 84–90 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kulhare, S., et al.: Ultrasound-based detection of lung abnormalities using single shot detection convolutional neural networks. In: Stoyanov, D., et al. (eds.) POCUS/BIVPCS/CuRIOUS/CPM -2018. LNCS, vol. 11042, pp. 65–73. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01045-4_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Lahiri, A., Ayush, K., Kumar Biswas, P., Mitra, P.: Generative adversarial learning for reducing manual annotation in semantic segmentation on large scale miscroscopy images: automated vessel segmentation in retinal fundus image as test case. In: Proceedings of CVPR Workshops, pp. 42–48 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Liang, J., Chen, J.: Data augmentation of thyroid ultrasound images using generative adversarial network. In: IEEE IUS, pp. 1–4. IEEE (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nie, D., et al.: Medical image synthesis with deep convolutional adversarial networks. IEEE TBME 65(12), 2720–2730 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ouyang, J., et al.: Weakly semi-supervised detection in lung ultrasound videos. In: IPMI 2023, pp. 195–207 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pang, T., Wong, J.H.D., Ng, W.L., Chan, C.S.: Semi-supervised GAN-based radiomics model for data augmentation in breast ultrasound mass classification. Comput. Meth. Prog. Biomed. 203, 106018 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Radford, A., et al.: Unsupervised representation learning with deep convolutional generative adversarial networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.06434 (2015)

  17. Shea, D., et al.: Deep learning video classification of lung ultrasound features associated with pneumonia. In: CVPR 2023, pp. 3102–3111. IEEE (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Simonyan, K., Zisserman, A.: Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556 (2015)

  19. Volpicelli, G., et al.: International evidence-based recommendations for point-of-care lung ultrasound. Int. J. Med. Inform. 129, 413–422 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  20. World Health Organization (WHO): Pneumonia (2016). https://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs331/en

  21. Xu, Q., et al.: An empirical study on evaluation metrics of generative adversarial networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.07755 (2018)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Trust for their generous support, and Xinliang Zheng, Ben Wilson, Meihua Zhu, Cynthia Gregory, and Kenton Gregory for their roles in managing the lung ultrasound project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sourabh Kulhare .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

1 Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (pdf 3745 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Yu, M. et al. (2023). How Good Are Synthetic Medical Images? An Empirical Study with Lung Ultrasound. In: Wolterink, J.M., Svoboda, D., Zhao, C., Fernandez, V. (eds) Simulation and Synthesis in Medical Imaging. SASHIMI 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14288. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44689-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44689-4_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-44688-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-44689-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics