Skip to main content

Joint Prediction of Response to Therapy, Molecular Traits, and Spatial Organisation in Colorectal Cancer Biopsies

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2023 (MICCAI 2023)

Abstract

Existing methods for interpretability of model predictions are largely based on technical insights and are not linked to clinical context. We use the question of predicting response to radiotherapy in colorectal cancer patients as an exemplar for developing prediction models that do provide such contextual information and therefore can effectively support clinical decision making. There is a growing body of evidence that about 30% of colorectal cancer patients do not respond to radiotherapy and will need alternative treatment. The consensus molecular subtypes for colorectal cancer (CMS) provide one such approach to categorising patients based on their disease biology. Here we select the CMS4 subtype as a proxy for stromal infiltration. By jointly predicting a patient’s response to radiotherapy, the presence of CMS4, and the epithelial tissue map from morphological features extracted from standard H &E slides we provide a comprehensive clinically relevant assessment of a biopsy. A graph neural network is trained to achieve this joint prediction task, which subsequently provides novel interpretability maps to aid clinicians in their cancer treatment decision making process. Our model is trained and validated on two private rectal cancer datasets.

Supported by Cancer Research UK.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Achanta, R., Shaji, A., Smith, K., Lucchi, A., Fua, P., Süsstrunk, S.: Slic superpixels compared to state-of-the-art superpixel methods. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 34(11), 2274–2282 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alkan, A., Hofving, T., Angenete, E., Yrlid, U.: Biomarkers and cell-based models to predict the outcome of neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer patients. Biomark. Res. 9(1) (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anitei, M.G., et al.: Prognostic and predictive values of the immunoscore in patients with rectal cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 20(7), 1891–1899 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Caron, M., et al.: Emerging properties in self-supervised vision transformers. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chatila, W., Kim, J., Walch, H.: Genomic and transcriptomic determinants of response to neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer. Nat. Med. 28, 1646–1655 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, R.J., Krishnan, R.G.: Self-supervised vision transformers learn visual concepts in histopathology (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ding, K., Liu, Q., Lee, E., Zhou, M., Lu, A., Zhang, S.: Feature-enhanced graph networks for genetic mutational prediction using histopathological images in colon cancer. In: Martel, A.L., et al. (eds.) MICCAI 2020. LNCS, vol. 12262, pp. 294–304. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59713-9_29

  8. George, T.J.J., Allegra, C.J., Yothers, G.: Neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score: a new surrogate endpoint in rectal cancer clinical trials. Curr. Colorect. Cancer Rep. 11(5), 275–280 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Guinney, J., et al.: The consensus molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer. Nat. Med. 21, 1350–1356 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jones, H.J.S., et al.: Stromal composition predicts recurrence of early rectal cancer after local excision. Histopathology 79, 947–956 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lee, Y., Park, J., Oh, S.: Derivation of prognostic contextual histopathological features from whole-slide images of tumours via graph deep learning. Nat. Biomed. Eng. (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lipkova, J., et al.: Artificial intelligence for multimodal data integration in oncology. Cancer Cell 40(10), 1095–1110 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lu, W., Toss, M., Dawood, M., Rakha, E., Rajpoot, N., Minhas, F.: Slidegraph+: whole slide image level graphs to predict her2 status in breast cancer. Med. Image Anal. 80, 102486 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pina, O., Vilaplana, V.: Self-supervised graph representations of WSIS. In: Bekkers, E., Wolterink, J.M., Aviles-Rivero, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Geometric Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, vol. 194, pp. 107–117. PMLR (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Qi, L., et al.: Identification of prognostic spatial organization features in colorectal cancer microenvironment using deep learning on histopathology images. Med. Omics 2, 100008 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Raju, A., Yao, J., Haq, M.M.H., Jonnagaddala, J., Huang, J.: Graph attention multi-instance learning for accurate colorectal cancer staging. In: Martel, A.L., et al. (eds.) MICCAI 2020. LNCS, vol. 12265, pp. 529–539. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59722-1_51

  17. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., Brox, T.: U-net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sirinukunwattana, K., et al.: Image-based consensus molecular subtype (imcms) classification of colorectal cancer using deep learning. Gut 70(3), 544–554 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wood, R., et al.: Enhancing local context of histology features in vision transformers. In: Artificial Intelligence over Infrared Images for Medical Applications and Medical Image Assisted Biomarker Discovery. pp. 154–163. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19660-7_15

  20. Xu, J., Luo, X., Wang, G., Gilmore, H., Madabhushi, A.: A deep convolutional neural network for segmenting and classifying epithelial and stromal regions in histopathological images. Neurocomputing 191, 214–223 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Xu, K., Hu, W., Leskovec, J., Jegelka, S.: How powerful are graph neural networks? (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang, F., et al.: Predicting treatment response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in local advanced rectal cancer by biopsy digital pathology image features. Clin. Transl. Med. 10(2), e110 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zhou, Y., Graham, S., Koohbanani, N.A., Shaban, M., Heng, P.A., Rajpoot, N.M.: CGC-net: cell graph convolutional network for grading of colorectal cancer histology images. In: IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops, pp. 388–398. IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Data Use Declaration and Acknowledgements

The Grampian, Aristotle and FOCUS datasets used in this study were available through the S:CORT consortium. Grampian and Aristotle will be made publicly available shortly. Additional data is available on request to the S:CORT consortium. The S:CORT consortium was reviewed and approved by the South Cambs Research Ethics committee (REC ref 15/EE/0241; IRAS reference 169363). The Stratification in Colorectal Cancer Consortium (S:CORT) was funded by the Medical Research Council and Cancer Research UK (MR/M016587/1). The Aristotle trial was funded by Cancer Research UK (CRUK/08/032). The funders played no role in the analyses performed or the results presented. Financial support: RW - EPSRC Center for Doctoral Training in Health Data Science (EP/S02428X/1), Oxford CRUK Cancer Centre; VHK - Promedica Foundation (F-87701-41-01) and Swiss National Science Foundation (P2SKP3\(\_\)168322/1, P2SKP3\(\_\)168322/2); TSM - S:CORT (see above); JR, KS - Oxford NIHR National Oxford Biomedical Research Centre and the PathLAKE consortium (InnovateUK). The computational aspects of this research were funded from the NIHR Oxford BRC with additional support from the Wellcome Trust Core Award Grant Number 203141/Z/16/Z. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jens Rittscher .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

1 Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (pdf 278 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wood, R. et al. (2023). Joint Prediction of Response to Therapy, Molecular Traits, and Spatial Organisation in Colorectal Cancer Biopsies. In: Greenspan, H., et al. Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2023. MICCAI 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14224. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43904-9_73

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43904-9_73

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-43903-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-43904-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics