Skip to main content

Self-Employed Entrepreneurs’ Digital Mindset

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Entrepreneurship in the Digital Era

Abstract

Three research questions are addressed: (1) Is there a digital mindset gap between self-employed entrepreneurs and employees in general regarding digital communication and cooperation tools, (2) if yes, what are the differences in the digital mindset gap, (3) and finally, what can explain the digital mindset gap? The work method is a repeated survey, where answers are statistically compared to illuminate the digital mindset gap on various parameters including possible explanations of these gaps. The digital mindset gap is identified regarding the future use of experiences and competencies, work structure, digital behavior, attitude toward online meetings, financial and new project engagement, and professional social networks and communities. On all these differences self-employed entrepreneurs have a higher digital mindset than employees in general. However, in digital literacy, job satisfaction, and well-being, there are no significant differences between the entrepreneurs and employees, thus excluding this as an explanation for the digital mindset gap.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Pearson’s chi-square (χ2) uses a summation of squared standard deviations to compare how a particular distribution (e.g., entrepreneurs) compares to an expected distribution (e.g., employees). Such difference is reported (degrees of freedom), χ2 value, and p-value. The degrees of freedom represent the number of data sources used in the calculation, the χ2 indicates the degree of difference, and a p-value of .05 or lower indicates a difference as significant (Field, 2009).

References

  • Analyse Danmark, Quantitative and qualitative research in Denmark and the Nordic countries, https://analysedanmark.dk/english/, last accessed 2022/04/28.

  • Barhate, B., Hirudayaraj, M., & Nair, P. K. (2022). Leadership challenges and behaviours in the information technology sector during COVID-19: a comparative study of leaders from India and the U.S. Human Resource Development International, 25(3), 274–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bögenhold, D. (2020). Self-employment and entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive or destructive? In A. Örtenblad (Ed.), Against entrepreneurship (pp. 19–35). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • DESI. (n.d.). The digital economy and society index. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/desi, last accessed 2022/04/28.

  • Field, A. P. (2009). Discovering Statistics using SPSS (and sex drugs and rock’ ‘n roll) (3rd ed.). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gifford, J. (2022). Editorial: Remote working: unprecedented increase and a developing research agenda. Human Resource Development International, 25(2), 105–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinic, A., Fertalj, K., Kalpic, D. (2012). Methodological framework for virtual team project management. International Journal of Innovation, 3(6), 702–707. Management and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikołajczyk, K. (2021). Changes in the approach to employee development in organisations as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. European Journal of Training and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steude, D. H. (2021). Challenges of remote leadership in a digitalized working world 4.0. Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, 85(1), 65–86. Organizacijų vadyba: sisteminiai tyrimai.

    Google Scholar 

  • UFM: Undervisnings- og Forskningsministeriet [Ministry of Higher Education and Science]. Last accessed 2022/04/28, from https://ufm.dk/aktuelt/pressemeddelelser/arkiv/2009/ugens-tal-dtu-har-landets-yngste-kandidater/studerendes-alder-som-faerdige-kandidater

  • Vătămănescu, E.-M., Bratianu, C., Dabija, D.-C., & Popa, S. (2022). Capitalizing online knowledge networks: From individual knowledge acquisition towards organizational achievements. Journal of Knowledge Management.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claus Andreas Gram Foss Rosenstand .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rosenstand, C.A.G.F., Henriksen, T.D. (2023). Self-Employed Entrepreneurs’ Digital Mindset. In: Schallmo, D., Pätzmann, J., Clauß, T. (eds) Entrepreneurship in the Digital Era. Management for Professionals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43188-3_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics