Skip to main content

Fairness-Enhancing Ensemble Classification in Water Distribution Networks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Computational Intelligence (IWANN 2023)

Abstract

As relevant examples such as the future criminal detection software [1] show, fairness of AI-based and social domain affecting decision support tools constitutes an important area of research. In this contribution, we investigate the applications of AI to socioeconomically relevant infrastructures such as those of water distribution networks (WDNs), where fairness issues have yet to gain a foothold. To establish the notion of fairness in this domain, we propose an appropriate definition of protected groups and group fairness in WDNs as an extension of existing definitions. We demonstrate that typical methods for the detection of leakages in WDNs are unfair in this sense. Further, we thus propose a remedy to increase the fairness which can be applied even to non-differentiable ensemble classification methods as used in this context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://github.com/jstrotherm/FairnessInWDNS.

  2. 2.

    In practise, we train and test the (ensemble) classifier(s) on unseen data for times \(i \ge n_r+1\). However, for the sake of readability, we choose the indices \(i=1,...,n_c\) instead of \(i=n_r+1,...,n_c\) here.

References

  1. Angwin, J., Larson, J., Mattu, S., Lauren Kirchner, L.: Machine Bias - There’s software used across the country to predict future criminals. And it’s biased against blacks. ProPublica (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Artelt, A., Vrachimis, S., Eliades, D., Polycarpou, M., Hammer, B.: One Explanation to Rule them All - Ensemble Consistent Explanations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.08974 (2022)

  3. Barocas, S., Hardt, M., Narayanan, A.: Fairness and Machine Learning: Limitations and Opportunities. fairmlbook.org (2019). www.fairmlbook.org

  4. Castelnovo, A., Crupi, R., Greco, G., Regoli, D., Penco, I.G., Cosentini, A.C.: A clarification of the nuances in the fairness metrics landscape. Sci. Rep. 12(1), 4209 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dwork, C., Hardt, M., Pitassi, T., Reingold, O., Zemel, R.: Fairness through awareness. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference, pp. 214–226 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. European Commission and Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology: Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. Publications Office (2019). https://doi.org/10.2759/346720

  7. Gao, F., Han, L.: Implementing the Nelder-Mead simplex algorithm with adaptive parameters. Comput. Optim. Appl. 51(1), 259–277 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Hardt, M., Price, E., Srebro, N.: Equality of opportunity in supervised learning. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 29 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Isermann, R.: Fault-Diagnosis Systems. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-30368-5

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Jorge Nocedal, S.J.W.: Numerical Optimization, vol. 2. Springer, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., Galstyan, A.: A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 54(6), 1–35 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pessach, D., Shmueli, E.: A review on fairness in machine learning. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 55(3), 1–44 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Santos-Ruiz, I., López-Estrada, F.R., Puig, V., Valencia-Palomo, G., Hernández, H.R.: Pressure sensor placement for leak localization in water distribution networks using information theory. Sensors 22(2), 443 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Vaquet, J.: Automation Toolbox for Machine learning in water Networks (2023). www.pypi.org/project/atmn/

  15. Zafar, M.B., Valera, I., Rogriguez, M.G., Gummadi, K.P.: Fairness constraints: mechanisms for fair classification. In: Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pp. 962–970. PMLR (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the ERC Synergy Grant Water-Futures (Grant agreement No. 951424).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janine Strotherm .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Strotherm, J., Hammer, B. (2023). Fairness-Enhancing Ensemble Classification in Water Distribution Networks. In: Rojas, I., Joya, G., Catala, A. (eds) Advances in Computational Intelligence. IWANN 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14134. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43085-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43085-5_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-43084-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-43085-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics