Skip to main content

The Burnt City’s Legacy: Immersivity, Mimesis, and Enargeia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Punchdrunk on the Classics

Abstract

This chapter considers how The Burnt City might reshape our understanding of the history of immersivity. Although theatre scholars traditionally position immersive theatre within a chronology of experiences going back only to the twentieth century, classicists have long interpreted ancient literature through the lens of a poetics of immersion, meaning that immersive experiences can be identified as far back as our earliest examples of ancient Greek literature. In this chapter, I consider how we might align the twenty-first-century immersive theatre phenomenon with this wider history of immersion, initially by examining points of connection between Punchdrunk’s practice and the genre of Greek tragedy. I then consider two ancient concepts that are linked with the idea of immersion, namely mimesis, or representation, and enargeia, or vividness. I showcase how each concept was understood in antiquity and is manifest in ancient literature, drawing upon Aristotle and Plato in my discussion of mimesis and Lysias, Homer, and Thucydides in my discussion of enargeia. By putting Punchdrunk’s work into dialogue with ancient ideas of immersion, I shed new light upon how we might understand immersivity in antiquity, by paying more attention to its relationship with the embodied materiality of performance. Overall, the chapter works to invite one to reconceptualise Punchdrunk’s practice within a broader history of immersivity, and to consider the significance of theatricality and embodied performance outside of the theatre and in relation to textuality as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Allan et al. (2017: 35–36).

  2. 2.

    Allan et al. (2017: 35) and Gardner (2014).

  3. 3.

    Biggin (2017: 1).

  4. 4.

    HM Government (2018).

  5. 5.

    James (2022).

  6. 6.

    Barrett, quoted in Gayet (2022).

  7. 7.

    Doyle, quoted in Bloodworth (2022).

  8. 8.

    Barrett, quoted in Bloodworth (2022). Punchdrunk’s website quotes reviews describing Punchdrunk as ‘hands down the best immersive theatre company in the world’, ‘pioneers of the “immersive theatre” phenomenon’, ‘immersive theatre on an epic scale’, and ‘pioneers of ultra-immersive drama’. See Punchdrunk (2022).

  9. 9.

    Machon (2013: 65–66).

  10. 10.

    Pimentel and Teixeira (1993: 15).

  11. 11.

    Ryan (1994: np; 2015: 2). On immersion and virtual reality environments post-Pimentel and Teixeira, see Biggin (2017: 21–23).

  12. 12.

    See Nield (2008: 531).

  13. 13.

    On the potential for the in-yer-face and postdramatic labels to obscure the differences between works, see Cole (2019: 39–40).

  14. 14.

    Barrett, quoted in James (2020).

  15. 15.

    Ryan (2015: 217).

  16. 16.

    Olsen (2021).

  17. 17.

    Olsen (2021: 167).

  18. 18.

    Budelmann and van Emde Boas (2019).

  19. 19.

    Budelmann and van Emde Boas (2019: 78).

  20. 20.

    On choral projections, see Henrichs (1996) and Nikolaidou-Arabatzi (2015: 27–28).

  21. 21.

    Gianvittorio-Ungar (2019).

  22. 22.

    Gianvittorio-Ungar (2019: 243).

  23. 23.

    Gianvittorio-Ungar (2019: 244).

  24. 24.

    Ritter (2020: 109).

  25. 25.

    See Tomlin (2016: 55). Diamond notes that Brecht’s anti-Aristotelianism is now well-understood to disguise key connections with Aristotle, and that in some ways Brecht insisted on more mimesis, rather than less, via the idea of mimesis not as representation but as a mode of reading that transforms an object into a gestus or a dialectical image. See Diamond (1997: ii, viii–ix).

  26. 26.

    Lehmann (2006: 100).

  27. 27.

    Machon and Punchdrunk (2019: 277).

  28. 28.

    Halliwell (2002: 38) and Belfiore (1984: 121).

  29. 29.

    Schaeffer and Vultur (2005: 238).

  30. 30.

    Halliwell (2002: 53).

  31. 31.

    Barrett, quoted in James (2020).

  32. 32.

    Barrett, quoted in Hoggard (2013).

  33. 33.

    Biggin (2015: 306–307).

  34. 34.

    Ritter (2017).

  35. 35.

    Westling (2020: 2).

  36. 36.

    See Raeburn and Thomas (2011) and Nagy (2013) for an overview of these debates.

  37. 37.

    Machon and Punchdrunk (2019: 244).

  38. 38.

    Zeitlin summarises that it ‘would not be hyperbole to suggest that no other rhetorical term [than ekphrasis] has aroused such interest in recent years among classicists and non-classicists alike, involving aesthetic considerations, theories of vision, modes of viewing, mental impressions, and the complex relationships between word and image’. See Zeitlin (2013: 17). For a summary of the differences between ekphrasis in antiquity and modernity, see Webb (2009: 1–2). Although the terms are not extensively theorised until the first century CE, they can be found much earlier. The adjective enarges (visible, manifest), for example, is found as early as Homer; see Allan et al. (2017: 35).

  39. 39.

    Zeitlin (2013: 18) and Webb (2009: 8).

  40. 40.

    Trans. Usher (1974). On the Dionysius of Halicarnassus passage, see Zanker (1981: 297).

  41. 41.

    Webb (2009: 128–129).

  42. 42.

    Huitink (2019a: 170).

  43. 43.

    See Peter O’Connell’s analysis of this ratio in O’Connell (2017: 239).

  44. 44.

    On this strategy within modern law, see O’Connell (2017: 232–233).

  45. 45.

    Allan et al. (2017), see enargeia as a predecessor of the modern notion of immersion and position it as of key importance within the history of the poetics of immersion.

  46. 46.

    Huitink (2019a: section 4). O’Connell adds to this list deictic pronouns and adverbs, the so-called historical present, and most importantly detailed descriptions. See O’Connell (2017: 226). Although speaking about immersion in ancient literature more generally, rather than enargeia specifically, Allan’s catalogue of immersive textual features is also relevant, and includes the use of proximal spatial and temporal deictics and first- and second-person pronouns. Allan (2019: 18–19).

  47. 47.

    Grethlein et al. (2019: 2–3) and Huitink (2019b: 190).

  48. 48.

    While enargeia refers to the reader evoking or imagining the narrated events, ancient critics were also familiar with the opposite phenomenon, namely the sensation of a listener being transported to the narrated events. Longinus saw this dislocating strategy as characteristic of the sublime [On the Sublime 1.4]; on the relevance of the sublime to immersion, see Allan et al. (2017: 37).

  49. 49.

    See Huitink (2019a, esp. p. 176).

  50. 50.

    Huitink (2019a: 178).

  51. 51.

    Wakefield (2019).

  52. 52.

    I borrow the term ‘narrative sting’ from Grethlein et al. (2019: 8).

  53. 53.

    Translation adapted from Huitink (2019b: 188).

  54. 54.

    Richardson (1993: 214).

  55. 55.

    See Gagarin (1983).

  56. 56.

    Radosavljević (2022). Indeed, in Cole (2021) I argue that the fragmentary nature of the underpinning source text in Punchdrunk’s Kabeiroi facilitated a depth of immersion, positing that the sense of lack contained within the fragmentary form provided a productive impetus for the audience to create the unified imaginary world necessary for a ‘deep’ form of immersion.

  57. 57.

    Webb (Forthcoming).

  58. 58.

    Translation adapted from Babbitt (1936).

  59. 59.

    Translation adapted from Babbitt (1936).

  60. 60.

    Walker (1993: 358).

  61. 61.

    On ancient literature as a semantic scaffold in experimental performance see Cole (2019, esp. p. 3).

Works Cited

  • Allan, Rutger J. 2019. Narrative Immersion. In Experience, Narrative, and Criticism in Ancient Greece: Under the Spell of Stories, eds. Jonas Grethlein, Luuk Huitink, and Aldo Tagliabue, 15–35. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Allan, Rutger J., Irene J. F. de Jong, and Casper C. de Jonge. 2017. From Enargeia to Immersion: The Ancient Roots of a Modern Concept. Style 51: 1: 34–51. https://doi.org/10.5325/style.51.1.0034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babbitt, Frank Cole. Ed. 1936. Plutarch. Moralia, Volume IV. Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belfiore, Elizabeth. 1984. A Theory of Imitation in Plato’s Republic. TAPRA 114: 121–146. https://doi.org/10.2307/284143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggin, Rose. 2015. Reading Fan Mail: Communicating Immersive Experience in Punchdrunk’s Faust and The Masque of the Red Death. Participations: Journal of Audience & Reception Studies 12: 1: 301–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Immersive Theatre and Audience Experience: Space, Game and Story in the Work of Punchdrunk. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloodworth, Adam. 2022. Immersive Theatre Giants Punchdrunk: “We Want Audiences to Feel a Sense of Danger”. City AM, April 12. https://www.cityam.com/1864248-2-immersive-theatre-giants-punchdrunk-the-burnt-city-woolwich-arsenal/. Accessed 29 November 2022.

  • Budelmann, Felix, and Evert van Emde Boas. 2019. Attending to Tragic Messenger Speeches. In Experience, Narrative, and Criticism in Ancient Greece: Under the Spell of Stories, eds. Jonas Grethlein, Luuk Huitink, and Aldo Tagliabue, 59–80. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, Emma. 2019. Postdramatic Tragedies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2021. Fragments, Immersivity, and Reception: Punchdrunk on Aeschylus’ Kabeiroi. International Journal of the Classical Tradition 28: 510–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12138-020-00578-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, Elin. 1997. Unmaking Mimesis: Essays on Feminism and Theatre. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagarin, Michael. 1983. Antilochus’ Strategy: The Chariot Race in Iliad 23. Classical Philology 78: 1: 35–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, Lyn. 2014. Immersive Theatre: Living Up to Its Name, or Just an Overused Gimmick?. The Guardian, September 19. https://www.theguardian.com/stage/theatreblog/2014/sep/19/immersive-theatre-overused-marketing-gimmick. Accessed 9 December 2022.

  • Gayet, Mattieu. 2022. “A Modern Contemporary Audience Needs to Have Agency and Empowerment”—Felix Barrett, Maxine Doyle (Punchdrunk). XR Must, November 8. http://www.xrmust.com/xrmagazine/felix-barrett-maxine-doyle-punchdrunk/. Accessed 29 November 2022.

  • Gianvittorio-Ungar, Laura. 2019. Dancing the War Report in Aeschylus’ Seven Against Thebes. In Experience, Narrative, and Criticism in Ancient Greece: Under the Spell of Stories, eds. Jonas Grethlein, Luuk Huitink, and Aldo Tagliabue, 235–251. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Grethlein, Jonas, Luuk Huitink, and Aldo Tagliabue. 2019. Introduction: Narrative and Aesthetic Experience in Ancient Greece. In Experience, Narrative, and Criticism in Ancient Greece: Under the Spell of Stories, eds. Jonas Grethlein, Luuk Huitink, and Aldo Tagliabue, 1–12. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliwell, Stephen. 2002. The Aesthetics of Mimesis: Ancient Texts and Modern Problems. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Henrichs, Albert. 1996. Dancing in Athens, Dancing on Delos: Some Patterns of Choral Projection in Euripides. Philologus 140: 48–62. https://doi.org/10.1524/phil.1996.140.1.48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HM Government. 2018. Press Release: Creative Industries Sector Deal Launched. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/creative-industries-sector-deal-launched. Accessed 28 March 2023.

  • Hoggard, Liz. 2013. Felix Barrett: The Visionary Who Reinvented Theatre. The Observer, July 14. https://www.theguardian.com/theobserver/2013/jul/14/felix-barrett-punchdrunk-theatre-stage. Accessed 25 July 2023.

  • Homer. 2023. The Iliad. Trans. Emily Wilson. New York and London: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huitink, Luuk. 2019. Enargeia, Enactivism and the Ancient Readerly Imagination. In Distributed Cognition in Classical Antiquity, eds. Miranda Anderson and Douglas Cairns, 169–189. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019a. Enargeia and Bodily Mimesis. In Experience, Narrative, and Criticism in Ancient Greece: Under the Spell of Stories, eds. Jonas Grethlein, Luuk Huitink, and Aldo Tagliabue, 188–209. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • James, Anna. 2020. Felix Barrett: “I Want to Create Work That Leaves You Spinning”. The Stage, September 30. https://www.thestage.co.uk/big-interviews/felix-barrett. Accessed 5 December 2022.

  • ———. 2022. Putting Down Roots: How Immersive Theatre is Evolving. The Stage, November 10. https://www.thestage.co.uk/long-reads/putting-down-roots-how-immersive-theatre-is-evolving. Accessed 5 December 2022.

  • Lehmann, Hans-Thies. 2006. Postdramatic Theatre. Trans. Karen Jürs-Munby. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machon, Josephine. 2013. Immersive Theatres: Intimacy and Immediacy in Contemporary Performance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Machon, Josephine and Punchdrunk. 2019. The Punchdrunk Encyclopaedia. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, Gregory. 2013. The Ancient Greek Hero in 24 Hours. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nield, Sophie. 2008. The Rise of the Character named Spectator. Contemporary Theatre Review 18: 4: 531–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/10486800802492855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikolaidou-Arabatzi, Smaro. 2015. Choral Projections and “Embolima” in Euripides’ Tragedies. Greece & Rome 62: 1: 25–47. https://doi.org/10.2307/43297510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell, Peter A. 2017. Enargeia, Persuasion, and the Vividness Effect in Athenian Forensic Oratory. Advances in the History of Rhetoric 20: 3: 225–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/15362426.2017.1384766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, Sarah. 2021. Narrating Neoptolemus: Dance and Death in Euripides’ Andromache. In Choreonarratives: Dancing Stories in Greek and Roman Antiquity and beyond, eds. Laura Gianvittorio-Ungar and Karin Schlapbach, 156–179. Leiden and Boston: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel, Ken and Kevin Teixeira. 1993. Virtual Reality: Through the New Looking Glass. Blue Ridge Summit, PA: Windcrest/McGraw-Hill/TAB Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Punchdrunk. 2022. Punchdrunk. https://www.punchdrunk.com/. Accessed 9 December 2022.

  • Radosavljević, Duška. 2022. “The Burnt City”, One Cartridge Place. The Theatre Times, May 24. https://thetheatretimes.com/the-burnt-city-one-cartridge-place/. Accessed 9 December 2022.

  • Raeburn, David and Oliver Thomas, eds. 2011. The Agamemnon of Aeschylus: A Commentary for Students. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, Nicholas. 1993. The Iliad: A Commentary. Volume VII: Books 21–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, Julia M. 2017. Fandom and Punchdrunk’s Sleep No More: Audience Ethnography of Immersive Dance. TDR: The Drama Review 61: 4: 59–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2020. Tandem Dances: Choreographing Immersive Performance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, Marie-Laure. 1994. Immersion vs. Interactivity: Virtual Reality and Literary Theory. Postmodern Culture 5: 1. https://www.pomoculture.org/2013/09/24/immersion-vs-interactivity-virtual-reality-and-literary-theory/. Accessed 29 March 2023.

  • ———. 2015. Narrative as Virtual Reality 2: Revisiting Immersion and Interactivity in Literature and Electronic Media. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaeffer, Jean-Marie and Ioana Vultur. 2005. Mimesis. In Routledge Encyclopedia of Narrative Theory, eds. David Herman, Manfred Jahn, and Marie-Laure Ryan, 309–310. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlin, Elizabeth. 2016. Acts and Apparitions: Discourses on the Real in Performance Practice and Theory, 1990-2010. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usher, Stephen. Ed. 1974. Dionysius of Halicarnassus: Critical Essays, Volume I: Ancient Orators. Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakefield, Nik. 2019. Theatricality and Absorption: Politics of representation in Michael Fried, The Wooster Group and Robert Wilson. Performance Research 24: 4: 35-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/13528165.2019.1641321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Andrew D. 1993. Enargeia and the Spectator in Greek Historiography. Transactions of the American Philological Association (1974-2014) 123: 353–377. https://doi.org/10.2307/284335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, Liz. Forthcoming. Immersion, Emotion and Sensory Hierarchy: Thucydides Beyond Enargeia? In Experiencing Immersion in Antiquity and Modernity: From Narrative to Virtual Reality, ed. Emma Cole. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, Ruth. 2009. Ekphrasis, Imagination and Persuasion in Ancient Rhetorical Theory and Practice. Surrey: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westling, Carina E. I. 2020. Immersion and Participation in Punchdrunk’s Theatrical Worlds. London and New York: Methuen Drama.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanker, G. 1981. Enargeia in the Ancient Criticism of Poetry. Rheinisches Museum für Philologie, Neue Folge 124: 3: 297–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeitlin, Froma. 2013. Figure: Ekphrasis. Greece & Rome 60: 1: 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017383512000241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emma Cole .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cole, E. (2024). The Burnt City’s Legacy: Immersivity, Mimesis, and Enargeia. In: Punchdrunk on the Classics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43067-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics