Skip to main content

A Blockchain Model for Sharing Information in Criminal Justice Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Digital Forensics XIX (DigitalForensics 2023)

Part of the book series: IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology ((IFIPAICT,volume 687))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 110 Accesses

Abstract

Criminal justice systems around the world encounter missing case dockets and digital evidence. Problems are also posed by the mechanisms used to share criminal case data, especially email and paper documents that provide exposure to illegal data alteration.

This chapter describes a blockchain model for sharing criminal case data securely and efficiently with authorized criminal justice system entities. The model is implemented using Hyperledger Fabric and promising results were obtained during the simulation experiments. The model enables entities to access criminal case data in real time, which helps speed up the delivery of justice. Moreover, the model improves collaboration among the various entities, especially when it comes to joint operations and investigations involving law enforcement and prosecutors. The model also stores credible evidence because the underlying data is immutable and cannot be deleted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. L. Ahmad, S. Khanji, F. Iqbal and F. Kamoun, Blockchain-based chain of custody: Towards real-time tamper-proof evidence management, Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security, article no. 48, 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  2. F. Alruwaili, CustodyBlock: A distributed chain of custody evidence framework, Information, vol. 12(2), article no. 88, 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Bonomi, M. Casini and C. Ciccotelli, B-CoC: A Blockchain-Based Chain of Custody for Evidence Management in Digital Forensics, arXiv: 1807.10359v1 (arxiv.org/abs/1807.10359v1), 2018.

  4. A. Carstensen and J. Bernhard, Design science research – A powerful tool for improving methods in engineering education research, European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 44(1-2), pp. 85–102, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carte Blanche, Dockets for sale, YouTube (www.youtube.com/watch?v=s1L8j50Sgz0), April 10, 2022.

  6. Department of Correctional Services, Mission/Vision/Values, Republic of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa (www.dcs.gov.za/?page_id=174), 2023.

  7. Department of Justice and Constitutional Development, Strategic Plan for the Period 2011-2016: Annual Review 2011/12, Document no. RP45/2011, Republic of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa (www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201409/mtsf0.pdf), 2011.

  8. H. Elgohary, S. Darwish and S. Elkaffas, Improving uncertainty in chain of custody for image forensic investigation applications, IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 14669–14679, 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hong Kong Applied Science and Technology Research Institute, Whitepaper on Distributed Ledger Technology, Hong Kong, China (www.astri.org/tdprojects/whitepaper-on-distributed-ledger-technology), 2022.

  10. G. Hosken and S. Masombuka, A hole in Pistorius conman case docket, Sunday Times (South Africa), March 23, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hyperledger Fabric, Application Design Elements, San Francisco, California (hyperledger-fabric.readthedocs.io/en/release-2.2/developapps/designelements.html), 2023.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hyperledger Fabric, Getting Started – Install, San Francisco, California (hyperledger-fabric.readthedocs.io/en/release-2.5/getting_started.html), 2023.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hyperledger Fabric, Glossary, San Francisco, California (hyperledger-fabric.readthedocs.io/en/latest/glossary.html?highlight=ledger#), 2023.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hyperledger Fabric, Identity, San Francisco, California (hyperledger-fabric.readthedocs.io/en/release-2.2/identity/identity.html?highlight=certificate%20authority#what-is-an-identity), 2023.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hyperledger Foundation, About Hyperledger Foundation, San Francisco, California (www.hyperledger.org/about), 2023.

  16. Hyperledger Foundation, Hyperledger Sawtooth, San Francisco, California (www.hyperledger.org/use/sawtooth), 2023.

  17. L. Isaacs, DA demands in-field training for SAPS officers in the Western Cape, Eyewitness News (Cape Town), March 4, 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  18. S. Kaur, S. Chaturvedi, A. Sharma and J. Kar, A research survey on applications of consensus protocols in blockchain, Security and Communication Networks, article no. 6693731, 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. Khan, M. Uddin, A. Shaikh, A. Laghari and A. Rajput, MF-ledger: Blockchain Hyperledger-Sawtooth-enabled novel and secure multimedia chain-of-custody forensic investigation architecture, IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 103637–103650, 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. Li, C. Lal, M. Conti and D. Hu, LEChain: A blockchain-based lawful evidence management scheme for digital forensics, Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 115, pp. 406–420, 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. Lone and R. Mir, Forensic-chain: Blockchain-based digital forensics chain of custody with PoC in Hyperledger Composer, Digital Investigation, vol. 28, pp. 44–55, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  22. L. Matya, Almost 400 corruption cases involving SAPS members being investigated, SABC News (South Africa), November 3, 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  23. H. Natarajan, S. Krause and H. Gradstein, Distributed Ledger Technology and Blockchain, FinTech Note no. 1, World Bank, Washington, DC (hdl.handle.net/10986/29053), 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Select Committee on Security and Justice, Progress Report: Integrated Justice System (IJS) Programme, Department of Justice and Constitutional Development, Republic of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa (static.pmg.org.za/170531IJSReport.pdf), 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Republic of South Africa, MEC Albert Fritz on e-docket software not being effectively used by SAPS and courts, Media Statement, Pretoria, South Africa, March 5, 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  26. E. Yunianto, Y. Prayudi and B. Sugiantoro, B-DEC: Digital evidence cabinet based on blockchain for evidence management, International Journal of Computer Applications, vol. 181(45), pp. 22–29, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pardon Ramazhamba .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ramazhamba, P., Venter, H. (2023). A Blockchain Model for Sharing Information in Criminal Justice Systems. In: Peterson, G., Shenoi, S. (eds) Advances in Digital Forensics XIX. DigitalForensics 2023. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 687. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42991-0_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42991-0_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-42990-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-42991-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics