Skip to main content

Digital Rhetoric of Pandemic Elections: Toward Multilingual Multimodal Information Design

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Communication and Electoral Politics in Ghana

Abstract

The coronavirus pandemic has caused most activities to move into the digital ecosystem, thus igniting a plethora of suasive forces in digital infrastructure. This chapter discussed how discursive-material networks constrain information access in Ghana’s 2020 electoral process during a pandemic. Election messages are circulated through campaign rallies, but the 2020 election took on a more digital approach where information is designed and circulated in most social media spaces. We ask how digital infrastructure and linguistic choices prevent multilinguals from accessing campaign information and how can this vulnerability be prevented. Using the concept of affective data technologies, we explore how election candidates and their campaign teams attempted to design messages and use aggregates of data to structure voting desire while excluding electorates who do not have access to digital infrastructure. Our data comes from Facebook and YouTube. Our findings reveal that the linguistic and multimodal choices of campaign information on social media privilege a particular language and mode of delivery. We suggest that what we call Multilingual Multimodal Information Design (MMID) be used in future endeavors. These multimodal designs must center community linguistic diversity to cater to all netizens’ possible rhetorical action of issue-based voting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agbozo, G. E., & ResCue, E. (2020). Educational Language Policy in an African Country: Making a Place for Code-switching/Translanguaging. Applied Linguistics Review, 11(3), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (2009). Frames of War: When is Life Grievable? Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Confessore, N. (2018). Cambridge Analytica and Facebook: The scandal and the fallout so far. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/04/us/politics/cambridge-analytica-scandal-fallout.html

  • de Vries, G. (2020). Do Digital Technologies Put Democracy in Jeopardy? In M. Hildebrandt & K. O’Hara (Eds.), Life and the Law in the Era of Data-driven Agency (pp. 135–155). Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorpenyo, I. K., & Agboka, G. Y. (2019). Guest Editors’ Introduction: Election Technologies, Technical Communication, and Civic Engagement. Technical Communication, 65(4), 349–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The Qualitative Content Analysis Process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghana Electoral Commission. (2022). Retrieved January 3, 2022, from https://ec.gov.gh

  • Hauser, G. A. (2014). Rhetorical democracy and civic engagement. In G. A. Hauser & A. Grim (Eds.), Rhetorical democracy: Discursive practices of civic engagement (pp. 1–17). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesford, W. S., & Shuman, H. (2018). Precarious Narratives: Media Accounts of Islamic States’ Sexual Violence. In W. S. Hesford et al. (Eds.), Precarious Rhetorics (pp. 41–61). The Ohio State UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. R. (1998). User Centered Technology: A Rhetorical Theory for Computers and Other Mundane Artifacts. State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, N. R., & Johnson, M. A. (2020). Precarious Data: Affect, Infrastructure, and Public Education. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 50(5), 368–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, N. N., & Williams, M. F. (2018). Technologies of Disenfranchisement: Literacy Tests and Black Voters in the U.S. from 1890 to 1985. Technical Communication, 65(4), 371–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makalela, L., & White, G. (Eds.). (2021). Rethinking Language Use in Digital Africa: Communication and Technology in Sub-Saharan Africa. MultilingualMatters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mbembe, A. (2021). Out of the Dark Night: Essays on Decolonization. Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nackerdien, R. (2021). Voting in a Pandemic: Lessons for Elections in Africa in 2021. In Foresight Africa 2021 (p. 82). Brookings Africa Growth Initiative.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Democratic Congress. (2023). National Democratic Congress. Retrieved March 5, 2023, from https://www.facebook.com/OfficialNDCGhana

  • New Patriotic Party. (2023). New Patriotic Party (NPP: Development in Freedom). Retrieved March 5, 2023, from https://www.facebook.com/newpatrioticpartyghana

  • ResCue, E., & Agbozo, G. E. (2021). Creating Translated Interfaces: The Representation of African Languages and Cultures in Digital Media. In L. Makalela & G. White (Eds.), Rethinking Language Use in Digital Africa: Communication and Technology in Sub-Saharan Africa (pp. 51–72). Multilingual Matters.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rhue, L., & Sundararajan, A. (2014). Digital Access, Political Networks, and the Diffusion of Democracy. Social Networks, 36, 40–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez, F. (2018). Racial Gerrymandering and Geographic Information Systems: Subverting the 2011 Texas District Map with Election Technologies. Technical Communication, 60(4), 354–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez, F., Dorpenyo, I., & Sano-Franchini, J. (2021). Election Technologies as Tools for Cultivating Civic Literacies in Technical Communication. In R. Walton & G. Y. Agboka (Eds.), Equipping Technical Communicators for Social Justice Work: Theories, Methodologies, and Pedagogies (pp. 197–213). Utah State University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Statista, (2022). Ghana. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/search/?q=ghana&Search=&qKat=search&newSearch=true

  • Ward, C. (2020). Russian election meddling is back—via Ghana and Nigeria—and in your feeds. Retrieved from https://www.cnn.com/2020/03/12/world/russia-ghana-troll-farms-2020-ward/index.html

  • Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Edzordzi Agbozo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Agbozo, G.E., ResCue, E. (2024). Digital Rhetoric of Pandemic Elections: Toward Multilingual Multimodal Information Design. In: Mumuni, E., Nartey, M., Pappoe, R., Henaku, N., Agbozo, G.E. (eds) Communication and Electoral Politics in Ghana. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42771-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics