Skip to main content

Seismic Vulnerability Analysis of Symbiosis of New-Built Structure and Historic Heritage Architecture Based on Incremental Dynamic Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational and Experimental Simulations in Engineering (ICCES 2023)

Part of the book series: Mechanisms and Machine Science ((Mechan. Machine Science,volume 143))

  • 381 Accesses

Abstract

The historical heritage architecture—Red House is a brick masonry structure, which needs to be lifted as a whole and a new reinforced concrete frame structure built under it to cooperate with the protective comprehensive renovation project. In order to determine the seismic performance of this new and old symbiotic structure, this paper took the peak ground acceleration (PGA) as the ground motion intensity measure (IM), the maximum inter-story displacement ratio θmax as the structural damage measure (DM) for incremental dynamic analysis (IDA). The equivalent amplitude modulation method was used to modulate a series of original seismic waves, and then the nonlinear dynamic elastoplastic time history analysis was carried out through finite element simulation, and a series of IDA curves were obtained. On this basis, the seismic vulnerability analysis was carried out, and the damage probability in each limit state of the new and old symbiotic structure under different earthquake intensity was obtained. The results showed that the slightly damaged, moderately damaged, seriously damaged and collapsed probabilities under the 0.05 g PGA were 68.30, 18.14, 1.08 and 0.0018% respectively, meeting the design requirement of seismic fortification intensity equal to 6-degree. In addition, the finite element analysis results represented that the seismic damage mode of the new and old symbiotic structure was shown as the tensile damage of the new-built frame column bases and beam-column joints spreading upward to the tray beam, and finally penetrating the historical brick wall, causing structural failure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to report regarding the present study.

References

  1. Shi, S., et al.: Theoretical and experimental study on an innovative seismic retrofit solution for old brick masonry buildings. Eng. Struct. 225, 111296 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen, Z., et al.: Experimental study on the shear performance of brick masonry strengthened with modified oyster shell ash mortar. Case Stud. Const. Mater. 13, e00469 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2020.e00469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yao, X., et al.: Innovative seismic strengthening of historic masonry walls using polymer mortar and steel strips. Eng. Struct. 228, 111507 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yao, X., et al.: Study on the pseudo-static tests of typical brick masonry walls in rural China. Gongcheng Lixue/Eng. Mech. 34(6), 198–209 (2017). https://doi.org/10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2016.08.0617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Xie, Q., et al.: Shaking table testing and numerical simulation of the seismic response of a typical China ancient masonry tower. Bull. Earthq. Eng. 18(1), 331–355 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00731-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chávez, M., Meli, R.: Shaking table testing and numerical simulation of the seismic response of a typical Mexican colonial temple. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dynam. 41(2), 233–253 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. An, D., Qu, T., Liang, J.: Pseudo-dynamic test of brick masonry under different earthquake motion. Appl. Mech. Mater. 256–259, 2111–2116 (2013). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.256-259.2111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Karic, A., Atalić, J., Kolbitsch, A.: Seismic vulnerability of historic brick masonry buildings in Vienna. Bull. Earthq. Eng. 20(8), 4117–4145 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-022-01367-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kita, A., et al.: Rapid post-earthquake damage localization and quantification in masonry structures through multidimensional non-linear seismic IDA. Eng. Struct. 219, 110841 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen, Z., Yang, X.: Finite element simulation method for brick masonry reinforced with composite materials. Gongcheng Lixue/Eng. Mech. 37(4), 96–104 (2020). https://doi.org/10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2019.06.0298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ge, D., et al.: Seismic collapse simulation of existing masonry buildings with different retrofitting techniques. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 20(1), 127–139 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-021-2010-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Luo, W., et al.: Numerical analysis of seismic behavior of masonry walls confined by precast tie-columns. Appl. Mech. Mater. 166–169(3), 2429–2435 (2012). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.166-169.2429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Repapis, C.: Seismic performance evaluation of existing RC buildings without seismic details. Comparison of nonlinear static methods and IDA. Open Const. Build. Technol. J. 10, 158–179 (2016). https://doi.org/10.2174/1874836801610010158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu, D., Chen, H.: Seismic researches on a new assembled monolithic RC structure based on IDA. In: 31st International Conference on Vibroengineering, pp. 37–41. JVE International, Kaunas (2018). https://doi.org/10.21595/vp.2018.19799

  15. Derakhshan, H., et al.: Seismic fragility assessment of nonstructural components in unreinforced clay brick masonry buildings. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dynam. 49(3), 285–300 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Vemuri, J., Subramaniam, K.: Seismic fragility assessment of unreinforced masonry shear walls. Springer Sci. Busin. Media Deutschl. GmbH. 74, 1–14 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4079-0_1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. PEER Homepage, https://ngawest2.berkeley.edu, last accessed 2023/2/22

  18. GB 50003-2011: Code for design of masonry structures. China Architecture & Building Press, Beijing (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  19. HAZUS99 F.E.M.A.: Earthquake loss estimation methodology: user's manual. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  20. GB 50011–2010, GB 50011-2010: Code for seismic design of buildings. China Architecture & Building Press, Beijing (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Nature Science Foundations of China under grant 51978431 and 52038008; and the Shanghai Science and Technology Development Funds under grant 20DZ1202004 and 20DZ1202400. The authors gratefully acknowledge their financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiongyao Xie .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zou, J., Yang, H., Zhou, B., Xie, X., Yan, J. (2024). Seismic Vulnerability Analysis of Symbiosis of New-Built Structure and Historic Heritage Architecture Based on Incremental Dynamic Analysis. In: Li, S. (eds) Computational and Experimental Simulations in Engineering. ICCES 2023. Mechanisms and Machine Science, vol 143. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42515-8_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42515-8_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-42514-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-42515-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics